Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Animals by Midjourney

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Animals by Midjourney

These are all AI generated images of animals that contain various inaccuracies or rendering issues. Regardless, we don't generally host noneducational amateur artwork on Commons anyway. So these images should be deleted as OOS.

Adamant1 (talk) 08:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Small side thing to that. Although neither File:Cute animal generated by AI 'Mom calls me Precious'.jpg or File:AI-generated curious turtle; 'Stay Open to Life's Curiosities'.jpg seem to be in use I'm more then willing to say they should probably be kept due to the high quality and due them being good instances of where the technology really shines. Although I'll leave the final decision up to others. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Herauskorrixe Midjourney v5.png and File:Behigorri (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png should have inaccuracies, because those are not intended to be animals, but representations of mythological figures. Theklan (talk) 10:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep yet another indiscriminate “let’s delete everything in a category because it’s AI” nomination from Adamant1 Dronebogus (talk) 18:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete those not in use. Some poor images without clear usefulness. That it's AI nominated by Adamant1 is no more a reason to automatically keep than it is to automatically delete. I see some categorized as "Realistic animals by Midjourney" when they are not "realistic" in as much as they show obvious false anatomy. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the folllowing per COM:INUSE:

Regards, HaeB (talk) 00:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the above as well as these two due to high-quality and usefulness, partly being the most useful in several categories:

Several of the other images may be useful to illustrate how realistic pictures of animals (/ things in principle) AI generators can create or how they can do that but then fail at a simple part – I think this image was used for that: File:Close-up portrait of indian jackal with prey in its mouth, the light is golden, it's in a jungle (52863403241).png as it shows a realistic animal but fails at understanding what is meant with "prey in its mouth" in the prompt. Due to this I'm also very open to simply keeping all or at least all the individual files named by users here. Lastly, File:Vladimir Putin with monkey (1173814355247235082).png was nominated earlier and kept. It could be useful to add a tag to the thumbnail or file-title that it's AI generated using the file's categories. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:49, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I had left out "Vladimir Putin with monkey." I must have miss cliked. I removed it from the DR though. Thanks for mentioning it. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In addition to the above keep votes I also suggest to keep mine File:Crow and moon on the road.png image and the one to the right

. The claim that they aren't educative is a bit unsubstantiated. Some images are evident on how manipulative imaging software can be. --Alexander Davronov (talk) 20:53, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: most, no consensus for bulk deletion. Deleted a few of the worst that were not in use and had no specific keep votes (eg badly rendered shark with extra mouths in an underwater field of daisys!). No prejudging renomination of individual files or small related sets of files for specific reasons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]