Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Panam2014: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Undo revision 240218263 by Tostman (talk) no attack please
Tostman (talk | contribs)
more diplomatic
Line 365: Line 365:
**{{ping|Tostman}}
**{{ping|Tostman}}
I do not see the meaning of your vote. So because some files are not categorized that all need to be deleted? For the rest, I am trying to categorize them. --[[User:Panam2014|Panam2014]] ([[User talk:Panam2014|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
I do not see the meaning of your vote. So because some files are not categorized that all need to be deleted? For the rest, I am trying to categorize them. --[[User:Panam2014|Panam2014]] ([[User talk:Panam2014|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
{{ping|Panam2014}} Your editing behaviour is highly unusual. No normal user would mass-upload 360 files but don't add a single category.--[[User:Tostman|Tostman]] ([[User talk:Tostman|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:13, 9 April 2017

Files uploaded by Panam2014 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope; all unused and massive amounts of uploads by a new user; no educational value. We are not a personal photo repository.

Discussion

TJH2018talk 16:47, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TJH2018: But no, the file is educational since the person being photographed is capped in a certain way and is dressed in a certain way. No rule has been violated or it is shown to me. I plan to create fashion items and other contributors can still do it. I am not a new user. Also, the woman is a model. We could restaure the files who are not duplicate. Panam2014 (talk) 21:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Panam2014: I don't think you understand. We don't need 300+ photos of the same lady with the same darn haircut wearing different things. It's completely unnecessary and just a waste of resources that should be kept to Flickr (even though COM has almost limitless storage). For example, I can claim that this photo is educational because she is wearing a purple shirt, and I can't find a picture of a lady wearing a purple shirt. Does it mean it should stay? No. Regardless of whether they are a model or not, 99% of these photos will ever be used on other projects, and will most likely be seen once or twice a year. TJH2018talk 23:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I think you have uploaded enough photos for that. I recommend you to start creating such articles. If they are indeed appropriate I don't think there would be more doubts about the suitability of these images when they are (properly) used to illustrate them. Platonides (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see the meaning of your vote. So because some files are not categorized that all need to be deleted? For the rest, I am trying to categorize them. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC) @Panam2014: Your editing behaviour is highly unusual. No normal user would mass-upload 360 files but don't add a single category.--Tostman (talk) 13:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]