User talk:Steinsplitter: Difference between revisions

	SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} . For the archive overview, see Archive/. The latest archive is located at Archive/2024.

[1]. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:24, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--Steinsplitter (talk) 13:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Korbblütler (Asteraceae oder Compositae) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:41, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesen-Flockenblume (Centaurea jacea) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nothing Insteresting here but IMO this picture is QI --Wilfredor 20:57, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heyho,
kannst du Bilder von hier in die deutsche WP verschieben oder muss ich bei Admins in der de.wp fragen? Es geht um folgende Logos:

• File:2014 World Rowing Championships logo.png
• File:2013 World Rowing Championships logo.gif
• File:Seville 2013 European (small).jpg

In Deutschland müssten die durchgehen. Ich sehe da zumindest keine Schöpfungshöhe. Andere Meinungen? Grüße und Danke!--MaxEddi (talk) 16:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Es existiert meines Wissens kein Tool welches es ermöglicht per Mausklick die Logos zu übertragen. Du kannst die also einfach auf dewp hochladen. Diese Logos sind imho grenzwertig, bin aber kein Logo-Experte. ;-). LG--Steinsplitter (talk) 16:33, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, schade. Ich probiers in der de.wp. Kannst du die Logos schnelllöschen, oder so? Grüße--MaxEddi (talk) 20:00, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gelöscht da No permission since 18 September 2013, LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci dir :) --MaxEddi (talk) 20:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your involvement in this topic. Besides restoring more than 100 valuable images of Moldova, we can be proud for making such a valuable user as User:Донор return to commons. Thanks again! Have a nice day! //  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 23 September 2013 12:03 (UTC)

Hi, You're welcome! :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemeine Fichte (Picea abies) 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Pleclown 10:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riesenschirmpilz (Macrolepiota procera) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 10:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scheint inzwischen zu klappen? Falls du Lust hast kannst du die erste auch verschieben. Ich habe zwar schon das template gesetzt, aber das laesst sich sehr leicht entfernen. --McZusatz (talk) 20:57, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, die eine Cat habe ich per Hand gemacht ;-). LG--Steinsplitter (talk) 20:59, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ein anderer User als der Rechteinhaber hat über ein File ein völlig anderes Bild ein File drübergeladen. Ich würde es unter Vandalismus einstufen. Ich habs revertiert, aber eventuell sollte jemand mit File-Rechten das Photo löschen. Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Ich hab den Upload revertiert und den Nutzer auf seiner Disk benachrichtigt. Meine Recherche ergab dass es keine URV sein sollte. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:31, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke erst mal. Aber ich bin jetzt irritiert: ich sehe nach Deinem Revert immer noch das Hafenviertel vom Four-points-Sheraton aus (Sandakanbucht links). Das Originalfile vom April 2006 zeigt aber das Hafenviertel von den Hügeln hinter der Altstadt aus gesehen (Sandakanbucht quer über den ganzen Horizont). Schau Dir mal die thumbnails in der File History an ... --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe es erneut versucht. Hm... Musst du dich etwas gedulden, das Bild hängt vermutlich noch im Cache. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:06, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Achso, Du meinst den Cache serverseitig? hehe, da kann ich natürlich so oft Str-R und F5 drücken, wie ich will. Danke für Deine Mühen! --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 20:25, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gerne. Kann sein dass die Datei noch im Varnish hängt, du kannst versuchen die Seite zu Purgen. Erfahrungsgemäß ist nach maximal (!!!) ein paar Stunden alles wieder in Ordnung bei solchen Fällen. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:30, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Heiligenblut - 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Heiligenblut - Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, buy the white balance seems to be off, too yellow. It should be the same as in the other picture of Pfarrkirche Heiligenblut, if they indeed were taken at the same time?.. --Óðinn 16:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply] Thank you, uploaded a new version. --Steinsplitter 21:21, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply] Yeah, good to go now. --Óðinn 22:54, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Heiligenblut - 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 16:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)  Comment is this a dust spot in the upper left area ? --P e z i 17:11, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply] Thank you. removed. --Steinsplitter 20:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Winklern - Kapelle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please, delete (hide) old revisions (except the newest ones) of the following files:

• File:PL Władysław Łoziński - Oko proroka.djvu - because annoations author (Kazimierz Giebułtowski) died in 1959: pages with annoations deleted from DjVu file. Old versions will be PD in PL in 2030, PD in US (URAA) in 2033
• File:PL Stefan Grabiński-Księga ognia.djvu - because cover author (Andrzej Pronaszko) died in 1961: cover deleted from DjVu file. Old versions will be PD in PL in 2032, PD in US (URAA) in 2018
• File:PL Bolesław Leśmian-Dziejba leśna.djvu - because preface author (Alfred Tom) died in 1944: preface deleted from DjVu file. Old versions will be PD in PL in 2015, already PD in US (not URAA eligible)

Categories "Commons:Files with deleted versions to be restored in 20xx" already added to the mentioned files. Ankry (talk) 08:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:18, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Ankry (talk) 16:23, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Do you know where is the header for "Commons:Mobile access"? I was translating pt-br version, but I can't find a link to get there from original source. Can you find that please?—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:42, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Language template missing, fixed, Thank you! --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:49, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. Thanks.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:00, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask about File:Screenshot 2013-10-04-18-29-02.png? It is not a copyvio and I made the image myself. It is my Candy Crush Saga game and is in Chocolate Barn episode. Recently I finished that episode and it is my best done episode, so I wanted to post here and put it on my user page. I screenshot the image with my phone at Chocolate Barn episode. And the file also needs renaming as I uploaded it from my phone and forgot to change its destination filename. Jianhui67 Talk 11:13, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an unfree screenshot. You are not the Copyright holder of this game. See Commons:Screenshots --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:25, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, so even the game is played by me, the game I screenshot cannot be uploaded here as it is a copyvio. Sorry, it is my mistake. Will you help me to delete the file? I don't need it anymore. Thanks. Jianhui67 Talk 11:30, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

yes. deleted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:44, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, do you play Candy Crush Saga? I'm on level 248 and Chocolate Barn is my best done episode. I have 13 levels with 3 stars. Jianhui67 Talk 12:18, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i dos not play handy/computer games. ;-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:20, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Commons Barnstar
		I hereby award Steinsplitter the Commons Barnstar – for your tireless work. The community can be proud to have you as a member. --Jean11 (talk) 19:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Vielen Dank, der Barnstar freut mich sehr! :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:08, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Gern geschehen, freut mich das es dich freut :-) --Jean11 (talk) 20:23, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steinsplitter, sorry to bother you, but native German (language) assistance would be greatly appreciated at a discussion on my talk page. I denied a rename request, and the requester has question me on it, not knowing enough about the topic I would appreciate a native German speakers input into if the rename request should be granted or not. Thank you in advance. Liamdavies (talk) 14:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Liamdavies (talk) 15:06, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:07, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for dealing with the rename request (and the section below). As someone with no grasp on the German language I think I would have had trouble. Liamdavies (talk) 15:53, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

np :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:55, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steinsplitter, I saw you moved File:Alice Barbi, Baronesse Wolff von Stomersee, by Philip Alexis de László (1869-1937).jpg to File:Alice Barbi, Baronesse von Wolff Stomersee, by Philip Alexis de László (1869-1937).jpg but as far as I can see that name is not correct. See the history [2] of that file. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 19:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what is wrong? Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

+ see talk --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Richtig, nicht bemerkt das die Diskussion sich da fortgesetzt hat. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 22:36, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Es gab schon irgendwo eine? Wo genau? und was ist falsch? --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:55, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the history of the file Liamdavies stated All references I could find use the same title as the file. Do you have a source for the rename request?) Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:45, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong? Per drinker-institut the name is correct? --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:21, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correct name see on de:Johann Gottlieb von Wolff Gruß--Oursana (talk) 23:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte erneut Antrag stellen. Ich wurde von einem anderen User gefragt worden da einen blick drauf zu werfen weil jener sich nicht auskennt (ich übrigens auch nicht). Die Expertin welche ich fragte meinte der aktuelle Namen sei korrekt. Bitte erneut Antrag stellen zum umbenennen. Ich wies jetzt wirklich nicht was nun korrekt ist, widerspricht sich irgendwie alles. Tut mir Leid. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:38, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I have checked my script and fixed it. It will run normally now. When can you unblock me?--Gabrielchihonglee (talk) 14:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bot unblocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:52, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke dir --Itti (talk) 10:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gerne --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, die Frage um die Namensgebung einer Datei finde ich nicht so eindeutig. Kyrillisch ist in diesem Fall die örtliche Bezeichnung, jegliche Umschreibung in lateinischer Schrift (Transliteration) zieht die Frage hinter sich, nach welchen Vorgaben umgeschrieben wurde. Die Wenigsten werden sich am wissenschaftlich Sinnvollen ISO halten, viel mehr nutzt jeder seine angestammte Tradition, die eben nicht 100% ist. Ich will nicht streiten, die Sache hatte ich als Nichtigkeit schon längst ad acta gelegt. --Charlik (talk) 13:23, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Steinbeisser ist eine vorhergehende Benutzerseite von mir, die aus technischen Gründen nicht mehr bearbeitet werden kann. Wenn ich jetzt da die erledigten Löschwünsche nicht entferne wird das Teil dermaßen voll, daß weitere Löschwünsche, die dann da abgespeichert werden sollen bis zu 7 Minuten brauchen. Das kann es nicht sein, insbesondere noch ein paar hundert Überarbeitungen anstehen. speedy darf ich auch nicht machen, also was soll's? -- L' empereur Charles (talk) 10:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Huch. Wusste ich nicht. Warum aus technischen gründen? Du kannst die Benutzerseite doch archivieren? --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich richte dir das Automatische Archivirungszeugs auch gerne ein. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:26, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

aus technischen Gründen weil ich einen neuen Rechner bekommen habe und mein Passwort automatisiert war - es war dann weg und ich wusste es nicht mehr. Ein neues Passwort konnte mir nicht zugestellt werden, da sich auch die emiladresse geändert hatte. Also habe ich mit dem jetzigen Benutzerkonto, das ich wegen der massenhaften Bearbeitungen auf der fr:wp (wo ich auch unter diesem Namen angemeldet bin) eingerichtet hatte, weitergemacht. Wenn Du die Sache mit «Automatischen Archivirungszeugs» geradebiegen könntest, wäre mir das sehr recht! (Das gleiche gilt auch für User talk:Erwin Lindemann, den ich noch vorherer benutzt habe und dessen disk Seite im Moment bis auf das äußerste beansprucht wird. Was da zur Zeit noch ansteht findest Du in der Category «French infantry uniforms 1729» -- L' empereur Charles (talk) 11:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Schade mit der E-Mail/PW :(. Okay, habe dir das Archivzeugs eingerichtet. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:57, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke -- L' empereur Charles (talk) 12:08, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Variation among admins in application of duplicate policy with relation to different file types  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Can´t see any message for deleting File:Marietta von Hausswolff von Baumgarten.jpg. FrankieF (talk) 03:51, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Marietta%20von%20Hausswolff%20von%20Baumgarten.jpg&tour=nominatefordeletion? --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you, please, delete initial revision of this file? The book contains illustrations with unclear copyright status (unknown illustrator's death date). Text is already PD (both: in US and in PL). Ankry (talk) 20:55, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please see the page File:Encêtre Qc.ogg, because encêtre is not a word. Thanks ! Ruan123 (talk) 12:44, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for helping keep negative people free commons. We performed this humble gift Wilfredor (talk) 19:09, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:15, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded, also thanks for my promotion! mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 04:12, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

:-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:24, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, i need your little help. please delete this file File:Drawing-1 test.svg (i upload this file as a test edit) & delete last 3 version of this File:কোম্পানি প্রবেশদ্বার.svg & last 2 version of this File:Bangla Script.svg from file history [because of bangla font problem]. thanks in advance. --Aftab1995 (talk) 14:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drawing-1 test.svg= done; File:কোম্পানি প্রবেশদ্বার.svg + File:Bangla Script.svg imho no need :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:43, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per favoreeeeee, fai questi due. grazie--Aftab1995 (talk) 14:50, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:58, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, ich wollte wissen, ob Ihrer Meinung nach ist die beste erste oder zweite, weil ich sage, es ist schlecht verschwommen etc, dank --Σπάρτακος (talk) 15:41, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ersteres mit blauem Himmel hat eine kleinere Auflösung. Sind aber beide schön. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:54, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Und laut Sie ist unscharf, überbelichtet oder irgendetwas anderes negativ (Ich spreche von der zweiten) dank .--Σπάρτακος (talk) 16:11, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bin kein Experte, sieht meiner Meinung nach gut aus. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:22, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Se non sei esperto tu che sei un'amministratore chi può esserlo? Comunque grazie,mi hanno detto che che è sfocata brutta ecc... questa tua opinione mi fà capire che non sono io che sbaglio,nochmals vielen Dank--Σπάρτακος (talk) 16:27, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. What did you mean by this - Template:Reply? //  Gikü  said  done  Tuesday, 19 November 2013 06:54 (UTC)

thx --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Steinsplitter, kannst Du wohl mal wieder den Inhalt nach User:CommonsDelinker/commands kopieren. Die doppelte Weiterleitung von File:Flag of Iraq 1924.svg nach File:Flag of Iraq (1921–1959).svg wird wohl Probleme machen. Kannst Du die heilen? Gruß --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  19:20, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, die doppelte Weiterleitung hab ich aufgelöst und auf das richtige Ziel geändert [3]. Gruß --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  19:27, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, gerade wenig Zeit. Ich guck es mir morgen oder so an. --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:48, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bouhy-FR-58-calvaire-09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

François GOGLINS (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User Taron Saharyan again started to remove category without discussion and consensus. --Interfase (talk) 20:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i have no time atm. Pleas report the user on COM:AN/V. thx. :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:57, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/− Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Steinsplitter, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

und die Benachrichtigungen kann man doch einfach löschen, oder. Gruß --Oursana (talk) 23:42, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:45, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke♥--Oursana (talk) 23:55, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible to move it because, I think it would be better to place a counter on the files? And because it is the wish of myself as the uploader, primary interest of this file wll be the coat of arms. I have uploaed the other pictures now also like the name wished. (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Coats_of_arms_from_Flensburg ) Maybe the problem was that I used my second account I use in general for picture uploads: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Gott_allein_die_Ehre_%28Johanniskirche,_Flensburg%29.JPG&oldid=110955743 --Soenke Rahn (talk) 12:10, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Dateinamen sollten eigentlich nicht zu lang sein. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:14, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank, ich behalte es im Hinterkopf und achte in Zukunft mehr drauf. --Soenke Rahn (talk) 12:18, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help on cleaning up Europejczyk's "contributions"! Tabercil (talk) 17:12, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

np :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up those cross wiki spam images here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alexander Tatarnikov. Natuur12 (talk) 13:23, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

np :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:26, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Steinsplitter,

io ho aggiunto l'immagine di questo vescovo [4] nella pagina a lui dedicata. non so però se ho fornito le informazioni necessarie a che l'immagine non venga eliminata: ho indicato solo fonte e autore, bisogna dare altri riferimenti? grazie,Turlupiu (talk)

(C) é vietato su commons. Ma questo puo essere PD... Devi aggiungiare una licensa etc. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just saw that all my pictures are under violation of copyrights. All the pictures that i upload to my account has been taken by me (in my own camera) or by one of my colleagues to the work. I am working with car magazine so usually write the copyrights under the magazine name and not as mine. If necessary i will write the copyrights under my name - at list the pictures that i made, witch is almost all of them.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ? (talk • contribs)

Pleas send a E-Mail to COM:OTRS, Thank you! --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Steinsplitter! Taxiarchos228 greift mich auf Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vitra Design Museum nachts1.jpg persönlich an. Ich habe keine Ahnung, was ich ihm getan habe. Es wirft mir vor mit an ihm zu "rächen" und diffamiert mich als "selbsternannten Copyright-Experten". Ich finde das absoult nicht OK. Wo müsste ich so etwas melden? Einen solchen massiven Konflikt habe ich auf Commons bisher nicht erlebt. Wie ist deine Meinung dazu? --Tuxyso (talk) 08:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Offensichtlich hat Tuxyso ein kleines Sprachproblem. Ich habe ihn nicht als selbsternannten Urheberrechts-Experten diffamiert. Dazu müsste ich ihn zunächst als einen Urheberrechts-Experten bezeichnet haben, was ich nirgendwo gemacht habe. Richtig ist: ich habe gesagt, dass ich einem Anwalt mit Berufserfahrung ein besseres Urteilsvermögen zutraue als selbsternannten Urheberrechtsexperten, die er bei WP hier zurate ziehen möchte. Dass seine Kontra-Stimme nur wenige Minuten abgegeben wurde nachdem ich sein Bild mit Kontra bewertet habe, wirkt in diesem Zusammenhang nun mal sehr merkwürdig. Tuxyso ist gut beraten, wenn er seine Emotionen besser in den Griff bekommt und nicht ungerechtfertige Anschuldigungen in den Raum bläst. Ihn bringt ja bereits eine seiner Ansicht nach nicht zeitnahe Antwort in offenkundige Unruhe. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich zitiere dich: Your "reserch" is based on a non juristic book with a disputable conclusion made by yourself. I guess an advocate which is involved day to day with this questions is more authentic than any self-appointed "copyvio expert"'. (Hervorhebungen von mir). Auf wen soll sich das bitte sonst beziehen? Mir Rachegelüste vorzuwerfen "In fact this smells very strong to be a revenge-contra" ist kein persönlicher Angriff? Ich habe dich nirgendwo angegriffen. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Richtig, ich zog deine Recherche in Zweifel. Und was weiter? Wo steht, ich hätte dich als Urheberrechts-Experten bezeichnet? Nirgendwo. Du kennst die Bedeutung des Wortes "any" oder muss ich sie dir erst erklären? Dachte du hast Urlaub in den USA gemacht. Da sollte man wenigstens die Basiswörtchen kennen. Für mich ist das Thema hier durch. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich warte nun auf die Meinung der beiden Admins, die ich angeschrieben habe. Und bitte verschone mich mit deiner herablassenden Art "any" oder muss ich sie dir erst erklären? Dachte du hast Urlaub in den USA gemacht. Ich verstehe echt nicht, was du für ein Problem mit mir hast? Bis vor einer Woche hatte ich nichts und auch wirklich gar nichts mit dir zu tun. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Steinsplitter,

entschuldige zunächst dass wir deine Diskussionsseite hier mit einem Sachverhalt füllen, mit dem Du nichts zu tun hast. Aber der Abschnitt wurde nicht von mir initiiert.

Der Satz [5], in dem ich Tuxyso angeblich beleidigt haben soll, lautet auf Deutsch:

Deine "Recherche" fußt auf einem nicht-juristischen Buch, aus welchem Du deine fragwürdige Schlussfolgerung ziehst. Ich nehme an, dass ein Anwalt, der tagtäglich mit solchen Fragen zu tun hat, glaubwürdiger ist als jeder selbsternannte Urheberrechtsexperte. Tatsächlich riecht deine Stimmabgabe nach einem Rach-Kontra für dieses hier.

Da Tuxyso offenbar der Ansicht ist, dass hier bei commons zu wenig Benutzer auf den Löschantrag aufmerksam werden, verfasste er noch einen "Hilferufe" in der Wikipedia, um dort "Deutsche Urheberrechtsexperten" zu ihrer Einschätzung zu bewegen (I asked the German copyvio experts for further help.) Genau auf diesen Satz bezieht sich meine Antwort, dass ich meinem Anwalt, dem ich das Bild übrigens übermittelt habe, mehr vertraue als irgendwelchen selbsternannten Urheberrechtsexperten. Wieso Tuxyso einen Satz, der ausdrücklich und sprachlich unmissverständlich, der eine imaginäre Menge (die der selbsternannten Urbeberrechtsexperten) bezeichnet, rein und einzig auf sich münzt, bleibt unverständlich. Hier betreibt Tuxyso emotionalisierte Interpretation. Und selbst wenn ich ihn persönlich als Urbeberrechtsexperten bezeichnet hätte, so kann ich auch in dieser Titulierung nur schwerlich einen Beleidigung erkennen.

Offenbar in Ermangelung an wahrer Argumente muss Tuxyso hier wohl auch noch unterstellen, ich hätte meinem Anwalt das Bild hier vorenthalten und die Aussage meines Anwaltes sei rein theoretischer Natur, ohne das Bild zu kennen. (I guess your lawyer decided rather technically than considering your motive. This is not only a judicial problem but a photographic question.) Solche Unterstellungen empfinde ich meinerseits als schlechten Diskussionsstil. Es hat nicht umsonst ein paar Tage gedauert, bis ich eine Antwort gepostet habe. Tuxyso hat sich durch sein Verhalten in den letzten Tagen für mich leider als ernstzunehmener Teilnehmer bei commons disqualifiziert. Beleidigt habe ich ihn deswegen noch lange nicht. Dass mir aber weder seine Art noch sein Auftritt gefällt ist eine legitime Meinungsäußerung, und das Recht das zu sagen nehme ich mir heraus. Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry to interfere. This is not a big issue at all. Keep the DR and FPC separate. Considering the voting pattern, it will be closed as featured on Dec 6. The time for the closing of the DR is also Dec 6; and it will be kept or deleted as per the admin decision. As the DR is not just counting of votes, there is no such problems as canvassing etc. Please be calm and wait for the result. :) JKadavoor Jee 09:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich wurde hierher bestellt, sorry @Steinsplitter für die Einmischung. Mein Kommentar in Wlady's FPC beruht auf meiner Erfahrung hier, was so alles in DR's als nicht de minimis eingeschätzt wird. Etwa laufen derzeit ganz viele No-FoP-Löschanträge, wo es offenbar bereits ausreicht, dass ein "unfreies" Gebäude irgendwo im Bild unscheinbar an der Ecke auftaucht, und schon haben wir anscheinend eine URV oder müssen halt schneiden, verpixeln oder ähnliches. Es scheint also, dass de minimis eher mit Vorsicht zu genießen ist, auch wenn das unfreie Objekt scheinbar nur zu einem kleinen Teil im Bild dasteht. Hier im Fall des Museums steht das Kahn-Foto nunmal nicht ganz am Rand und es ist auffälliger Bestandteil der Komposition, und wenn man es verpixeln würde, sähe das Gesamtbild doch schon wesentlich anders aus; da würde vermutlich eine visuelle Lücke klaffen, was natürlich die Gesamtkomposition gründlich vermiesen würde, so dass eine FP-Auszeichnung dann wohl nicht mehr in Frage käme. Selbst wenn also ein Anwalt dies als Beiwerk einschätzt, ist dennoch nicht unwahrscheinlich, dass ein oder mehrere Kollegen von ihm dies anders sehen könnte. Ich finde daher die Idee schon mal gar nicht so verkehrt, im deutschen UR-Forum nachzufragen (auch wenn sich dort, wie auch überall in der Deutschpedia, weit mehr Dilettanten als echte Experten herumtreiben). Vielleicht wäre es sogar sinnvoll, einen Juraexperten der WMF hinzuzuziehen (soweit mir bekannt ist, gibt es auch eine solche Möglichkeit). Zu guter Letzt. Ich bin der bescheidenen meinung, dass zwei User, die irgendwie miteinander im Konflikt stehen (aus welchem Anlass auch immer), grundsätzlich die FP-Nominierungen gegenseitig meiden sollten und insb. nicht kurz darauf bei dem jeweils anderen mit Contra stimmen. Ich habe da leider u.a. mit "Tomascastelazo" negative Erfahrungen gemacht und weiß wohl, wovon ich rede. Sorry, aber ich habe letzter Zeit immer stärker den Eindruck, dass die FPC von immer mehr "Kollegen" als soziales Netzwerk mit "Like"-"Dislike"-Knöpfchen etc. missverstanden werden. Ich rate euch beiden, eure Contras zurückzuziehen und euch bis auf Weiteres ausm Weg zu gehen. Und zumindest den Entscheid in der LD abzuwarten. --A.Savin 09:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Wladyslaw and Tuxyso, just forget this and move on. :) JKadavoor Jee 09:40, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke A.Savin für deinen weisen Ratschlag, dem ich glatt gefolgt bin. Nur um das noch mal richtig zu stellen: Schon wieder wird mir das Wort im Mund umgedreht: "Offenbar in Ermangelung an wahrer Argumente muss Tuxyso hier wohl auch noch unterstellen, ich hätte meinem Anwalt das Bild hier vorenthalten und die Aussage meines Anwaltes sei rein theoretischer Natur, ohne das Bild zu kennen." Meine Aussage I guess your lawyer decided rather technically than considering your motive. This is not only a judicial problem but a photographic question. bedeutet lediglich, dass sich der Anwalt vermutlich nicht mit den fotografischen Besonderheiten des Bildes beschäftigt hat, sondern eher technisch auf Grund der Größe des Fotos entschieden hat. Wie bei Juristen üblich schauen diese in ihren Gesetzteskommentar und stellen fest, dass in Urteilen ein Anteil von 10 Prozent am Gesamtbild in den meisten Fällen als Beiwerk ausreicht. Wie auch A.Savin schlüssig geschrieben hat, kann es dazu auch unter Juristen durchaus unterschiedliche Auffassungen geben. Wiki funktioniert nun mal Bottom-Up und nicht Top-Down, soll heißen: Mir ist es relativ egal ob Taxiarchos228's Anwalt eine andere Position vertritt als ich (oder andere). Letztlich sollte das bessere und richtigere Argument zählen. Ich bin jetzt an der Stelle auch raus und werde A.Savins Rat folgen und Taxiarchos228 fortan besser ignorieren. --Tuxyso (talk) 12:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(*mich eingelesen habe*) Hallo, Ich kann mich A.Savin nur anschließen. Sollte das Problem weiterhin bestehen wäre COM:AN/U die richtige Anlaufstelle. Bitte COM:AGF lesen. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Steinsplitter,

ich habe versucht mit den für mich völlig neuen Übersetzungswerkzeugen die o.g. Seite ins Deutsche zu übersetzen. Leider taucht der Abschnitt/Satz TBD. A winner or winners? Does it appear on the main page? (ziemlich oben unter "Winning") nicht als zu übersetzender Abschnitt auf. Wenn ich den Quelltext richtig verstehe hast du, als du die Seite zum Übersetzen markiert hast, vergessen diesen Abschnitt zu markieren. Da die zu übersetzenden Abschnitte anscheinend durchnummeriert werden, mag ich da jetzt nicht einfach drin rumpfuschen. Magst du da vielleicht mal ein Auge drauf werfen? Grüße, --El Grafo (talk) 13:02, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Den Abschnitt habe ich mit Absicht ausgelassen da er anscheinend (TBD) noch verfasst werden muss. Es ist sinnlos etwas zu übersetzen was bald neu geschrieben wird. Wenn du willst kann ich den Abschnitt in das Übersetzungstool aufnehmen und Danke für's übersetzen. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:07, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, OK. Ich denke, früher oder später wird wird der Abschnitt sowieso übersetzt werden müssen. Ich hätte es jetzt sinngemäß erstmal mit "steht noch nicht fest" oder so übersetzt – wäre für jemanden ohne Englischkenntnisse sicher hilfreicher als das was da jetzt steht. Da das ganze Projekt derzeit noch sehr rudimentär ist, wird man sowieso im Laufe der Zeit noch an vielen Stellen nacharbeiten müssen – insofern hat das keine Eile. Grüße, --El Grafo (talk) 13:37, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Habe den Abschnitt gestern in das System aufgenommen. lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just saw that all my pictures are under violation of copyrights. All the pictures that i upload to my account has been taken by me (in my own camera) or by one of my colleagues to the work. I am working with car magazine so usually write the copyrights under the magazine name and not as mine. If necessary i will write the copyrights under my name - at list the pictures that i made, witch is almost all of them.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yatirda (talk • contribs) 07:38, 5 December 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Pleas send a E-Mail to COM:OTRS, Thank you! --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Steinsplitter, why do you have restored this version? Last version conformity with article en:Armenian Eternity sign. Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 17:03, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you editwar? Pleas use the talk page. Thanks --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:49, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you restored this version, you remove all new and part of old categories of Category:Armenian Eternity Sign. Last version is a stable version and not have a reason reverted old versions. why do you protected this category? Only I create and edit this 16 categories. Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 18:13, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a temporary protection because of editwarring. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:15, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I'll wait until the 8th of December, but I do not understand the need for your actions and do not see the desire to help in the development of this category. Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 18:41, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be participating in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users' contributions. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:35, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I own products, took pictures of said products, optimized images in photoshop and uploaded them here. These photos offer historical accuracy to an article and have no copyright protection since they are mine to release. See:

   File:Overseas Special for members of the Military supplied by Barbasol.jpg
   File:Barbasol Flavors-lg.jpg
   File:1950s can-lg.png
   File:Barbasol NASCAR.jpg
   File:Rogers Hornsby Advertising Clipping.jpg
   File:Barbasol Original 10oz sm.jpg
   File:Barbasol Packaging and Jar from the early years.png

Please make these active right away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by J.accurate (talk • contribs) 13:52, 6 December 2013‎‎ (UTC)

Pleas send a E-Mail to COM:OTRS, Thank you! --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

do i have the right to re-submit in a month or so?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kostas2125 (talk • contribs) 11:37, 7 December 2013‎‎‎ (UTC)

Yes --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look. Somehow files were not deleted. Same for Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rodalperez. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, deleted. thx :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--Gabrielchihonglee (talk) 14:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The banners are your own work? no? I have found the full photo on the www. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry.--Gabrielchihonglee (talk) 11:30, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I plan to reopen the DRs closed by Yann without notifying him, because he doesn't want to be notified.[6] I can't do anything here. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me,

But why did you feel the need to delete my photos? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.108.5.166 (talk • contribs) 06:01, 11 December 2013‎‎‎ (UTC)

Pleas send a E-Mail to COM:OTRS, Thank you! --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Steinsplitter, I noted your revert. Don't you want it to be more visible on the page? Do you prefer CAPS?Lotje (talk) 05:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This is not a revert. I have fixed the makeup. It is visible for me. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:45, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you please undelte this file. There is an OTRS-ticket 2013121610010626 for this file. Thanks in advance. Natuur12 (talk) 19:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:48, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Natuur12 (talk) 19:49, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Litte 20e 24 portraits nb carré.jpg Droits d'auteur ? Toutes les vignettes sont tirées de photos présentes sur Wikimedia Commons (photos parfois recadrées et adaptées en noir et blanc)  : vérifiez !PRA (talk) 10:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Je ne parle pas français. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:12, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Licence ? Google traduction :Licence ? Alle Vorschaubilder sind von Fotos auf Wikimedia Commons (Bilder und angepasst beschnitten manchmal schwarz und weiß): Check

Licence ? All thumbnails are from photos on Wikimedia Commons (images and adapted sometimes cropped black and white): check. PRA (talk) 17:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done. Thanks Leitoxx 14:22, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jianhui67 is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 09:10, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thx and merry christmas --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry christmas!
	Merry christmas, and a happy new year, and thanks for your work this year! :) 레비Revi 14:35, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thx and merry christmas --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why this revert? If COM:QI is started to migration into new translation system, then it is right way. Not? --Kaganer (talk) 22:32, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See User talk:BaseSat#Your_renamings --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:31, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Holidays!
	G'day, just a quick greeting wishing you and your family happy holidays and all the best for 2014. And of course, a big thank you for putting a leg up by doing what you do on Commons, and helping to make it the fantastic project that it is. Greetings from a warm west coast of Aussie. russavia (talk) 01:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thx and merry christmas --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:29, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jianhui67 is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 09:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich schließ mich mal an. Alles Gute für's neue Jahr, Steini! Vogone (talk) 03:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thx :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see user talk:Eserasus. He uploaded some pictures from that cross wiki spamming painter and see also this page at the vi wiki. Maybe the sockpuppets are back. I hope not but the pictures came from this flickr account. Since you are the one who cleaned up those files the last time you migt want to know that part of these files where reuploaded. Natuur12 (talk) 12:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi, done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. Natuur12 (talk) 13:06, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steinsplitter. I noticed the autopatrol right you granted to a user is redundant as he is already an OTRS member. Thanks. JianhuiMobile (talk) 13:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oops did not see that sorry. :P JianhuiMobile (talk) 15:50, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was under the impression that the botrun had been approved: Commons:Bots/Requests/Riksbot regards Profoss (talk) 20:25, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Approved but not flagged as bot. Sorry for blocking. See Commons:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#User:Riksbot, Have a nice evening. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]