User talk:A.Savin

Hello Alexander, best wishes, good health and what of the happiness!! --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:15, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks, best wishes for you too!! --A.Savin 12:22, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Милейший Александр. Простите, что беспокою в неурочный день. Есть малая просьба. Лет пять назад, не зная толком правил викимедия, назвал я не совсем верно две категории: Khanon Yuri & Savoiarov Mikhail. Ошибка невелика (всего-то, поменять местами имя и не-имя), всё надеялся: найду как это сделать самостоятельно. Но вот, нашёл только как к Вам обратиться. Миллион Извинений. С поклоном, --—(FinitoR) 16:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Сделано. --A.Savin 17:00, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

благодарю Вас за скорую и любезную расправу (и прошу прощения, что Вам пришлось переименовывать столько раз одно и то же..., по правде говоря, рассчитывал эту рутину сделать сам, тем более спасибо). И ещё одно малое добавление. Если дойдут руки, прошу Вас, посмотрите на шаблон "Authority control" (на русский язык переводится как "авторитетный контроль". Смешно, но поправимо, не так ли?) Дополнение (на всякий случай, если я был не совсем понятен. Я имел в виду вот этот шаблон авторского контроля: {{Authority control|VIAF= |LCCN=nr/ / }}--—(FinitoR) 09:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Я не эксперт в библиотечных терминах, но если ввести "авторитетный контроль" в гугле, там много результатов за пределами вики. Так что предположу, что перевод верный. Других идей на этот счёт у меня нет, сожалею. --A.Savin 10:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за внимание и простите за докучливость... Я тоже не эксперт (в библиотечных)... и потому настаивать не стану. Однако я исходил из словарных значений русского языка... М-м-м. Думаю, разница между автором и авторитетом (нам с Вами) ясна не понаслышке... Россия-мать. --—(FinitoR) 10:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

) Feliz año nuevo --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 20:57, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Уважаемый Александр,

Хотел бы, прежде всего, поздравить Вас с наступившим Новым годом, а также с новым признанием Ваших замечательных работ.

Не могли бы Вы помочь в удалении неудачных снимков, загруженных в Коммонз? Речь о двух первых версиях фотографии малайзийского поэта Заена Кастури ([1]). На первой изображен другой малайзийский поэт - ее автор, участник Victor Pogadaev, залил случайно. А вторая просто некачественная. Виктор Александрович попросил об удалении этих фото на моей СО, полагая, что я смогу это сделать сам. Однако я, конечно же, должен переадресовать эту просьбу более компетентному коллеге:)

С уважением, Bapak Alex (talk) 07:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день,

этот файл загружен локально в русской википедии, где у меня нет возможности удалить его версии.

Обратитесь, пожалуйста, к админам раздела. --A.Savin 11:54, 9 January 2014 (UTББC)

Большое спасибо за совет, сейчас обращусь. Bapak Alex (talk) 13:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img01 National Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img06 University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 17:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img15 Old Market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:PM08-13 img02 Kloster Lehnin.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PM08-13 img03 Kloster Lehnin.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img03 Polish Theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img09 Wroclawska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:11, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img14 Old Market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 20:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alexander, I would want to know if I can join the page Meet our photographers, and if yes if there is a model template to be used (where can I find it?), or if I must copy an existing page. For your last nomination, after a second look, I see no tilt, I corrected my comment. And one more time, thank you for your support during my last featured promotion, I appreciate that this image was promoted. --Christian Ferrer 08:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done I've just find it : Template:Wikimedia photographer, however I wait for your confirmation if I can join the page --Christian Ferrer 09:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Yes, imo no problem. Anyone with 10 or more own FP may be listed. --A.Savin 10:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done Now, I have my profile page. --Christian Ferrer 11:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img07 Philharmony.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 17:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments f4 was a bad choice here. The bottom part is visibly unsharper than the top part. But with regard to the resolution still OK. --Tuxyso 07:43, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo A.Savin, das Max-Planck-Institut befindet sich tatsächlich im ehemaligen Gebäude des Hauptpostamts. Für das Bild – das einzige dieses Gebäudes – bin ich sehr dankbar. Gruß--Leit (talk) 23:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img17 Old Market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 10:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img13 Old Market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img18 Tram.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (and nice to have full LEDs) --DXR 12:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img19 Old Brewery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DXR 12:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img02 Raczynski Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Вы всерьёз думаете, что 7 января 2011 года произошло раньше, чем 31 декабря 2010 года? Но почему в календаре такая промашка? Обычно январь бывает после декабря... --PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:31, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

А в чем проблема-с? В том, что в России Рождество отмечают на две недели позже, чем в других странах? Так это к РПЦ вопрос, а не ко мне. --A.Savin 15:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

На мой взгляд, в 2011 году произошло Рождество 2011 года. А на ваш взгляд, в 2011 году произошло Рождество 2010 года. Проблема в том, что вы переносите событие 2011 года в 2010 год. (Справочно: Рождество в январе отмечают Россия, Словения, Хорватия, Черногория, Грузия, Абхазия, Албания, Ливан, Азербайджан, Казахстан, Киргизия, Латвия, Турция, Венгрия, Италия, Украина, Белоруссия, Литва, Таджикистан, Туркмения, Египет, Македония, Сирия, Узбекистан, Япония, Израиль, Иордания, Сербия, Босния и Герцеговина, Македония, Индия, США, Словакия, Польша, Ирак, Эфиопия, Эритрея, и ещё несколько стран.) --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:41, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Это не я перенёс, а так в категориях и до меня было. Все категории Christmas xxxx in Russia как в январских, так и в декабрьских. В этом своя логика, так как Рождество празднуют с конца декабря по начало января, и Рождество 7 января - праздник уходящего года, пришедшийся на январь только потому, что так хочет РПЦ. Короче, что-либо менять в устоявшейся системе категорий я не намерен. --A.Savin 17:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

РПЦ тут ни при чём. Это древняя традиция многих стран.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Это, если что, суть не меняет. --A.Savin 17:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Во время патрулирования одной из статей в русской Википедии вы в числе прочих правок отпатрулировали и вот эту. Скорее всего просто упустили её из виду, но хочу всё же сообщить об этом. Отпатрулированные изменения не так внимательно проверяют и эта весьма ненейтральная формулировка провисела там довольно долго. -- Morrfeux (talk) 17:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Вы правы. Прошу извинить. По всей видимости, статья до этого не патрулировалась вообще. --A.Savin 17:41, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 20:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img05 Grand Theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img12 Ballet School.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img16 Old Market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siegessaeule Aussicht 10-13 img2 Klingelhoeferstr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:56, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siegessaeule Aussicht 10-13 img3 Potsdamer Platz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:22, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siegessaeule Aussicht 10-13 img4 Tiergarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good, I like it --Christian Ferrer 16:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siegessaeule Aussicht 10-13 img5 Regierungsviertel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:56, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grunewald hill view 10-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siegessaeule Aussicht 10-13 img1 Moltke Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, A.Savin. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

For User_talk:Zhuyifei1999#Abuse_filter --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img08 University Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  very weak pro Good quality, but the top of the building is a little bit unsharp (depending on f/8 and 8mm). IMO it's still QI. --XRay 13:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw you removed my photos from the list of Featured picture candidates. I have red the guidelines, and I cannot see why you removed them. I want to nominate them one by one. -abbedabb^disk 12:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See COM:FPC#General rules, number 11. --A.Savin 16:35, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alexander, I need a little of help. I do not think that I or my photos let us deserve of such comment and I feel me assaulting. Which procedure then to make against this character? He would need to understand that a little of restraint is necessary. The page is not an overflow to let off steam. Please help me or indicates me whom to turn me. --Christian 18:32, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strange discussion, indeed. I don't know Latvian language, GoogleTranslate provides something like "Can't recognize if this is a photo". I tend to think (and I hope) this isn't a personal offense anyway, but maybe Kikos is so kind to explain us what exactly they meant with "Pilnīgi nesapratu, kas te ir nofotografēts". Of course, any personally motivated comments on FPC are unwanted, only the candidating picture and not the photographer as a whole should be judged. --A.Savin 19:43, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now, he try to revert these comments --Christian 19:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This was their own comment. I'd say they're free to withdraw it. --A.Savin 19:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I think that even by speaking about the photo, it has a limit there not to be exceeded, I know something about it one time I was not very kind with one of your photos, you have certainly more detachment than me. Say that it does not look like a photo is a little bit offensive and I am thinking to open a discussion to this page. --Christian 20:14, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COM:ANU would be the right place for it. As I said, I'd bide a statement by Kikos and then decide. In general, if someone says "doesn't look like a photo", it also could mean "looks like a painting" which is in most cases a rather flattering evaluation. But if you state the same and mean it negative way, then it needs further explanation imho, because it is not obvious to me what a photo shall look like if it doesn't *even* look like a photo. )) --A.Savin 20:30, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• The way which leads to the wisdom is sometimes complicated. I think that I found a solution : the kindness. Thank you for having listened to me my friend. --Christian 06:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! "Google Translate" ia a very interesting mechanism :) "Pilnīgi nesapratu, kas te ir nofotografēts" means "Completely can't understand what [a object/composition] is there photographied". Yes, I've writen a assaulting comment. And later removed. Let I explain "why". I'm no a youngster in wiki and not a ocasional contributor. Lot a dogs eaten and can read between strokes. Wikipedia is a interesting place where people do diferent things. Some people write articles, some draw maps, some create photographies, but some hurry about good functionality and good look of it all. One of my jobs is "Commons:Picture of the day" section in lv-wiki. And when I have to place in my frontpage weak image - it is really disturbing. It means - some people in commons are not in their duty. Collegue Christian is a wery productive photographer. And when I more detailed perused their portfolio - not so bad photographer as he told :) (and I've removed my angry comment) But - it is necessery to promote every picture taken? Even if this picture is "so-so"? We all have lot of friends there who can vote for  Support. But - is it the best way? We are collegues there and I think - collegues can tell each other about their mistakes or even speak aloud. If it is really necessery. And You can do that in my discussion pages - I've many :) Please - be not so resentful and think more globally. (writen with assistance of "GoogleTranslate") --Kikos (talk) 07:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So, we know now you meant that it isn't obvious to you what the subject of this photograph is. It is nothing personal for the photographer, so we can close it. But Commons is an international project and it is in most cases way more effective to say something in a bad English, than in your native language to let other people use even worse results by GoogleTranslate and similar tools. And yes, of course COM:FP should contain the real best stuff of Commons and no one should support or oppose just because of the photographer. --A.Savin 11:15, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes now there is not problem anymore, Kikos wants simply the best for wikimedia, and I would be satisfied if he again comes to make me share his interesting opinion on my photos. --Christian 11:32, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Of more the comments which we make are also of full contents and deserve too to be of quality. For somebody who wants the best it will not thus be difficult to understand that a minimum of effort is necessary for the general smooth running. --Christian 12:42, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]