User talk:EugeneZelenko

Archived messages: 1 2 3

Well, even if I do 200 a day, (then I would do nothing else) I don't think we will get the list down by ourselves. :(

Do you notice other people helping correct mistakes? We can invite them to help us as well. They especially don't have to be admins - they just have to know what they're doing. :) I'll make a post on the mailing list. I think no one really reads the village pump anyway, sigh... pfctdayelise (translate?) 16:24, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I asked help from User:Gildemax and User:Rüdiger Wölk. --EugeneZelenko 14:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like this tool User:Orgullobot/Welcome log! It helps a lot. --gildemax 22:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was heißt das, was Du mir auf die Benutzerdiskussion geschrieben hast? -- Abbatissa 20:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene!

Could you please block User:Daniol for a week or so. He is insulting me on my discussion page because I have restored the deletion and no source warnings on his discussion page:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AALE%21&diff=2119220&oldid=2111462

Regards!

--ALE! 17:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sanbec blocked Daniol already for 1 week. --EugeneZelenko 14:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Привет. Я по поводу Image:Donetsk-ticked-2.jpg и подобных. Получается я не могу выкладывать в коммонс отсканированные или сфотографированные лично билеты? А если будет фотка, на которой несколько билетов лежат на столе? И как быть, например, с афишами, значками и т.п.? --Butko 09:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ещё такой вопрос: Есть ли такой инструмент для Коммонс, который может показать какие из изображений загруженных мной впоследствии были удалены? --Butko 08:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree completely. He is already doing a lot of useful work with tagging images and talking to new users which is great. He has no Commons: namespace edits though (no Village pump). But I think it's not so important. I will wait a little bit and then I will ask him. My nomination of NeilsF is still on COM:A and I think he will have a better chance if I only have one nomination at a time ;) --pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He declined, quite sad, but I think he will continue to be very helpful. --pfctdayelise (translate?) 02:19, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I had asked for Intelliworks permission to use their image in the article I am writing on them. They have granted permission to use their logo under GPL. What should I do now? Upload the content again? Honeyuee

I don't think that corporate lawyer read your letter. If you noticed, I reuploaded this image into English Wikipedia with tag that usually applied to logos. --EugeneZelenko 13:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks buddy. Honeyuee 14:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for voting in my RfA. I do agree to your comments and it was mainly becuse I don't trust my english writing skills that I did apply now, I didn't wannt to do a lot of machine-like editing just to get a bunch of editcount. What I'm good at and willing to do is to revive diffrent forms of delitions (even if I belive my writing in english is en-2 do I belive my understandning is en-4). But I realise that I scholud have showed that I actualy also is able to write and be good att that sort of metawork to, becuse in the things I like to do much communication is also need to be done. I would intend to show this if I don't onlyckly is going away for the next 5 days. But thank you for your reply and what I have learnt from it. /Grön 06:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, recently Image:Ukrainian Stamp Fifa World Cup.jpg has been uploaded ([1]). The image claims to be PD-stamp according to Ukranian law. This seems to me like a reupload of Ukrainian_Stamp_Fifa_Wold_Cup.jpg, deleted by User:Thuresson due to FIFA 2006 world cup logo. I advised him and he sent me to you as you probably know better than us if this stamp can stay on commons or not. _{(is the stamp PD? can Ukrainia give to public domain a derivateve work of a logo?)}

Cheers Platonides 10:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it's called "Bad Old Ones". See e.g. [2]. I created a template, {{Delete assist}} which should be put on subcats of 'Unknown'. I just put it on the month-level ones, if you want to put it on day-level ones you're welcome to. It will just automatically create the link to Bad Old Ones for that category.

It's good if you want to delete "easy" cases that aren't being used anywhere. :) There's also a 'safe delete' option which creates a backup copy on the toolserver. However Brion is working on undeletion of images at the moment and it might be fixed permanently very soon!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for info. I'll look to new tool later. I tired today after adding many interwikis on be: :-) --EugeneZelenko 14:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, recently you tagged "missing essential source information" this photo I uploaded 5 days ago... How do I fix that ? What do I have to add to the description so that there is enough information ? In fact, one of my friends (fr:Utilisateur:Kiddo) took the photo and I simply uploaded it... FF7Sephiroth 14:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thank you for letting me know about the missing license info on the above mentioned image. I tried to add the license info today, but somehow could not find a posibility to change the license info of an already uploaded impage in Commons. Concerning the picture itself, I have taken it out of an official press kit (being allowed to be distributed freely) from the organisers of this survey. The image refers to an online poll called Perspektive Deutschland in German Wikipedia. Could you let me know, how I actually amend the license info for the picture? Sorry, for such basic nagging stuff,... Schiehallion 09:02, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded these thumbnails because the thumbnails produced by the Wikimedia software are really too worse in order to use them.

File:180px EU flags.png

I will delete these thumbs immediately after the issue is solved.

P.S. Please take a look here too: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Low_sharpness
--Lemonc 12:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you commented on User talk:Earthengine about a similarly-named image which has since been deleted. Should this be deleted too? pfctdayelise (translate?) 06:15, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also... would you be able to talk to this user, please? Somehow I doubt these images are "GFDL-self". Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You corrected my pic "Florfliege-Makro.jpg" last days... BUT I like to have the ||Category:Chrysopidae|| category in it because otherwise it's not in the siutable place unter the commons button (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Chrysopidae) - so could you please do that??? because i dont know how to do it better than i had done it and it had worked well the way i had done it. Thanks.

dudu

What could possibly be wrong with the source info on Otto F. Kernberg.jpg?--DorisH 15:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I believe it is called Otto F. Kernberg MD.jpg, it can be found in the Kernberg article: en:Otto F. Kernberg.--DorisH 15:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw this tagged as NLD, however I didn't entirely understand your rationale for labeling it such, as the uploader did give a licence (I'll admit that I'm more accustomed to the licenesing system of WikipediA the Commons, so I might have missed something). 68.39.174.238 22:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's more likely that this images come form website (== copyvio). If uploader claimed to be author, he/she could upload better resolution. If better resolution will not be provided, this image will be deleted. --EugeneZelenko 02:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I’m confused about this licenses thing. Pubic domain is not a part of GNU free documentation licenses? I’m all ready read about GNU in Wiki, but there are so many documents and I can make a correct idea. Which is the correct permission in this case? (I’m not an English writer user, so be lenient with me)--Scuellar 04:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:78159_17.jpg

i have already written the source it's cimoi and i have changed the author and i put cimoi

К сожалению изпользование изображении болгарских купюр в Википедии невозможно. Конечно есть другие материалы, незащитимые авторским правом по правилам болгарского закона. Т.е. шаблон нужен, но неприложим для данного случая. С поздравом, Zlatko + ^(talk) 11:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Оригинал можно найти очень легко ( http://www.paragraf22.com/pravo/zakoni/zakoni-d/2.htm ). А вот с переводами дела непросты. Если нужна только маленкая часть етого монументального труда, то я попропую перевести. -- Zlatko + ^(talk) 14:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Что-то такое, но не так :-(

1. нормативни и индивидуални актове на държавни органи за управление, както и официалните им преводи;

Если какой-то государственный закон или постановление данного министерства содержит изображение, то последнее является исключением.

2. идеи и концепции;

Аналогично если данная идея включает в себе какое-то изображение, то оное являясь частью идеи/концепции незащитимо.

3. фолклорни творби;

Фольклорные мотивы (скажем в рубахах) ...

4. новини, факти, сведения и данни.

А вот это может получить довольно много толковании - например всё содержание данного сервера возможно интерпретировать как данные ...

В том то и вся проблема, что это не единственный закон, который интерпретируем по разному. -- Zlatko + ^(talk) 15:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Если Вас не затрудняет, я бы отдал предпочтение удалению главной буквы в словосочетании «могли бы Вы» и заменой гораздо лучшей буковкой «т». С поздравом, Zlatko + ^(talk) 14:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I've got tremendous problems categorizing my work since I don't understand, how the categorizing-tool works. I uploades that image recently to the terraforming-article in the German wiki. Then I wanted to make the image accessable to other users in the wikimedia commons. I still can't find it here searching by the keyword "Terraforming", but I replaced the image I already had in the german wiki by this one… Can you help me categorizing it? Thanks a lot, Rokkon

I'm gonna upload from this site several pictures about proteins, like this one or something like that. But previously, I need to be certain that I'm able to do it. That site is by a group of American public laboratories (see here) working with public funds (the list of all the US National Agencies is on the bottom of the homepage)... I think that all their works are released in PD, but I'm not sure, because it's not written clearly. Can you help me? Thanks! --Giac! - (Tiago is here) 15:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene!

I'm new around here. and just trying to get the hang of it. I'm a grandmother. I don't think you've got too many of those around. I'm afraid I'm rather slow at catching on but I'm getting there with a bit of help. Whenever I go looking for the art objects I want on Wikimedia commons, I find all these things that are filed under weird names, or seem to be all out on their lonesome or have some anomally like

• Art of Austria
• Art of Belgium
• Art of Canada
• Danish Art
• Art of Egypt

So I never know what to do with anything. Or exactly how to do it. And categories that I expect to exist under a particular heading, don't! I spose people just make up the categories as they go along. It doesn't suit my relatively tidy mind.

So with the Four Martyrs of Westminster Abbey, I simply visited the various sites that I thought might want my pic, Martin Luther King Jnr, Bishop Romero and so on, and dropped the pic into the right place. So it's alreday been used four times.

Now I'm going to have to find things to do with my Chartres Cathedral sculpture and Windows, windows from Canterbury Cathedral, and the odd pulpit or three from Belgium. The pulpits ought to stay together as a group, but they ought also be at the churches that the belong to. Do your categories allow for something to appear at various places?

--Mandy 12:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EN: Hello! I think that now is ok? I have given the source of the image Greengreen.gif. I think that if this image is on english language Wikipedia the licence is confrimed. [3]

PL: Cześć! Myślę, że teraz jest ok? Podałem źródło obrazka Greengreen.gif. Myślę, że skoro ten plik znajduje się na angielskiej Wikipedii to jego licencja jets potwierdzona. [4]

GreenGreen.gif

Krzycho0 22:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]