Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nikon rangefinder d.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nikon rangefinder d.jpg

unneccessary bad version of the File:Nikon SP.jpg, no links, not needed anymore--K0_7zQY0oyqcz (talk) 18:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC) K0_7zQY0oyqcz (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not the same file, no reason to delete. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by K0_7zQY0oyqcz

Copyright holder of the pictures is Martin Emmert. I got no permission to use the picture for Wikimedia or Wikipedia. I immediately want this picture to be erased!- K0_7zQY0oyqcz (talk) 17:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, let me get this straight...

In March 2013, you ask for File:Nikon rangefinder d.jpg to be deleted as a duplicate. The deletion was declined, as it was not in fact a duplicate.
In October 2013, you request its deletion as being an unnecessary version of File:Nikon SP.jpg, except you failed to get the syntax right so it never showed.
Today, you suddenly claim it was an accidental upload and a copyright violation. And similarly for all your other files.

So, we have three different reasons as to why it should be deleted - unnecessary, accidental upload and copyright violation. I'd be willing to believe this was an accident, except for the previous DR which made no mention of the matter. Copyright violation... ok, first off, who is this Martin Emmert person - no obvious ghits for the name, and no google image hits for this photo. If it is in fact a copyvio, then you uploaded it less than a day after it was taken, which seems dubious at best. If we are to delete this, then I fully suggest that all other images by K0_7zQY0oyqcz, as, judging by the way they are suddenly claiming every upload is a copyvio, they cannot be trusted to release images under a free licence. Frankly what I see here is a user who, annoyed at being told they cannot have a photo they don't like deleted, is now throwing all their toys out of the pram, and doing anything they can to see their photos deleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be deleted ALL my files, because they are actually all the ONLY work of Martin Emmert, personal information redacted. He didn't provide any rights to me to share these files on Wikimedia or Wikipedia. I uploaded all these pictures for years accidentially (as I know now). He just made all these pictures for my homepage, but I unfortunately used them illegally for wikimedia. Today I already got deleted three files from some of your friends because of alleged copyright problems. Now I don't want to have any more problems with all this wikimedia/wikipedia copyright problems. And I also would prefer to find someone to talk in German about this topic; Mr. Emmert doesn't speak English at all. So please erase now ALL the uploaded pictures under my account, they are ALL copyright violated!!!-K0_7zQY0oyqcz (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What I see here is a 'mighty' administrator who, annoyed at being told by the uploader to erase a bad picture (that even wasn't used by anyone or any article!). On the other hand you just delete - without any warnings - (legal) pictures from articles that have been a hard work for weeks of searching, writing and recherche. This is actually an excellent way to frustrate members of the Wikipedia completely and to ensure that they give up finally - Success, so good bye!-K0_7zQY0oyqcz (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@mattbuck: What about AGF? I know K0_7zQY0oyqcz for years of discussions in usenet and I believe, he can be trusted. The files should be deleted immediately to avoid legal problems. -- Smial (talk) 21:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Smial, when a user tries to have an image deleted for various reasons, then suddenly says it's a copyvio, yes I get suspicious. While clear copyvios should be deleted, given several of these images have been around for over a year a few days of discussion will not hurt. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@K0_7zQY0oyqcz: Please be patient, deletion requests at commons sometimes need some time. -- Smial (talk) 21:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - unreliable statements by upload, apparently in an attempt to revoke the release - Jcb (talk) 22:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

K0_7zQY0oyqcz, what evidence have you got to show whose files these are?... --Gryllida 23:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

##The following were copied from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bulb (photography).jpg. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question: can you provide a bit more detail; did Martin Emmert take the picture? How/why did you characterize it as your own work? Where did you get the images you are now saying are someone else's? You had asserted on your user page (which you recently blanked) that these were "self-photographed". What that a lie, or are you just changing your mind about contributing them to commons? Dicklyon (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: there are a whole bunch of images in this same state of change of mind. Can we somehow combine their nominations and discuss in one place? Dicklyon (talk) 20:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be deleted ALL my files, because they are actually all the ONLY work of Martin Emmert, redacted He didn't provide any rights to me to share these files on Wikimedia or Wikipedia. I uploaded all these pictures accidentially (as I know now). He just made all these pictures for my homepage, but I unfortunately used them illegally for wikimedia. Today I already got deleted three files from some of your friends because of alleged copyright problems. Now I don't want to have any more problems with all this wikimedia/wikipedia copyright problems. User:Jcb decided (arrogantly) to block my speedy of the File:Nikon rangefinder d.jpg. I can't erase this picture by myself now. So please erase now ALL the uploaded pictures under my account, they are ALL copyright violated!!! If more information is neccessary (I don't think so) I also would prefer at least to find someone to talk in German about this topic; Mr. Emmert also doesn't speak English at all.-K0_7zQY0oyqcz (talk) 21:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich denke, wir können die Diskussion hier auch auf Deutsch führen. Was Dickylon wissen wollte: Wie kamst du dazu, diese Bilder als deine eigenen auszugeben - nicht nur beim Hochladen, sondern auch bis vor Kurzem auf deiner Benutzerseite? War das eine Lüge, oder möchtest du sie einfach nicht mehr auf Commons sehen? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 22:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert, ja genau, Ich hab ganz arg gelogen und würde jetzt gerne abschließend so schnell wie möglich das Thema Wikipedia/Wikimedia beenden. Dazu habe ich jetzt alles gesagt und bitte höflich um komplette Löschung aus rechtlichen Gründen (auch um Schaden von der Wikimedia abzuwenden, nicht wahr?)-K0_7zQY0oyqcz (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The trouble is that the license you granted cannot normally be revoked, unless we determine that there is a copyright violation. Your saying so is not enough. Probably someone who understands the OTRS system can contact the Martin Emmert, auf Deutsch, and ask him to provide evidence of ownership. Normally takedown requests need to come from the copyright owner. Dicklyon (talk) 10:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I provided all neccessary information and contact information to contact Martin Emmert. He is more than 70 years old, doesn't speak English and you just removed the contact information but don't provide any contact email adress to contact you. he is no member of any wiki and doesn't know much about computers. Now you consequently claim that I am a lyer and redo all my edits and declare it as vandalism. I don't have any other chance but to edit the files BECAUSE THEY DON'T BELONG TO ME!!! Do you understand that? AND THEY DON'T BELONG TO ANY WIKI. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT? DO YOU DECIDE WHAT'S YOURS AND WHAT'S MARTIN'S PROPERTY? I think you are not different from every other commercial company and now show your real face. You just want to keep something that doesn't belong to you for free and now looking for any reason just to keep it illegally - booooh!-K0_7zQY0oyqcz (talk) 10:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is what you need: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS. which says:

I am the copyright owner and my image is being hosted on Commons without permission.

Send us an e-mail (to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) with as much information as possible, such as who you are and where the document was published previously.

(also says it may take a while, like 15 days). He would need to list the images to be taken down; you can prepare the list for him. Dicklyon (talk) 10:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will tell him, but he won't understand it...-K0_7zQY0oyqcz (talk) 10:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If these weren't taken by you, why did you upload them in the first place, and why is it suddenly now important that they be removed? -mattbuck (Talk) 10:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - File:Photographer 70ies with Linhof Technika III.jpg shows a photographer, who appears to in fact be K0_7zQY0oyqcz. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Judging from de:Benutzer Diskussion:kjunix#„Datei:Teufel - Logo.jpg“ konvertieren this user tries to get all his own images deleted using false/fake claims of an authorship by someone else. BTW at AN/U the acclaimed author was said to be 70+ years old so the image above may show someone else. --Denniss (talk) 11:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It did look like the photo he provided. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Restoring of the removed usage will be needed. Jcb (talk) 11:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. in my opinion User:K0_7zQY0oyqcz try to revoke own work (pictures here on commons and parts of articles on de.wp). He also try to "delete" complete articles on de.wp, for example: de:Maske (Bildbearbeitung).--Wdwd (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep IMO seems to be a misguided attempt to revoke own work! Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 14:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Info ticket:2014020910006751 relates to this deletion request. Should appropriate evidence be provided on OTRS, then this DR will be updated with an explanation of what has been verified for the closing admin. --Fæ (talk) 15:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- This ticket seems to come from uploader himself. Jcb (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - As you are involved in this case it would be better if you avoided publicly speculating on emails related to this ticket. If I have any information to support discussion in this DR, or for the attention of the closer, my comments will be based on verified facts. --Fæ (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - The fact I based myself on was stored as a note in the ticket. Jcb (talk) 20:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Info User F.G. has a new alias. To me this looks like Frank wants to clean his name of the Wikipedia. Btw similar images like File:Cristo3.jpg and File:Cristo5.jpg you can find in the profile of someone called "Frank G." at www.fotocommunity.de --Cepheiden (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Too many pictures are taken with a digital still camera and uploaded to commons just a few minutes after. If F. G. isn't really the photographer he should provide a much better story why he uploaded quite a lot fresh taken pictures of a 70+ person without any permission over a time frame of more than 2 years and always name himself as the source/copyright holder.--Cepheiden (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily deleted as copyright violations per ticket:2014020910008697. We received background informations about this incident which appear to be sufficiently plausible to delete the whole lot per COM:PRP. These informations address also some of the unanswered questions above. In addition, I performed background checks that did not reveal anything which is in conflict to the informations given to us. However, I cannot disclose anything of this for privacy reasons. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nikon rangefinder d.jpg

File:Nikon rangefinder d.jpg

Files uploaded by K0_7zQY0oyqcz

Navigation menu

Search