Commons:Deletion requests/File:New Forest sunset birch 02.jpg

May also should get deleted:

• Some more files by Robert of Ramsor (contrib.; file log)

While the licence is CC-BY-3.0 the permission says "Non-commercial with attribution." which isn't allowed on Commons
D-Kuru (talk) 04:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep License has been corrected. Plrk (talk) 11:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where does it say that "Non-commercial with attribution." is not allowed?

If this is a valid reason, I would be grateful for the following.

• A. A reminder or pointing out as to the explicit point in Wiki Commons guidelines which says that this form of permission is not allowed.

• B. Someone getting in touch and leaving a message suggesting that a Deletion Request is being considered on grounds of XYZ, and suggesting I change the files before a Deletion Request is posted.

I discovered this because in the 12 - 24 hours since I was last logged in to Commons, the Wiki system headlined an advice that I had a message. The system sorks to make sure I am aware of messages. -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 14:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Licensing te learn about Non-commercial. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please hold action on this Deletion Request to give me time to change the choice of License and wording of Permission.

Administrator Joku Janne has contacted me, and I have replied to him and also asked for advice. (Asking for suggestions as to best wording for Permission and most suitable choice for License with Attribution, including derivatives.) I will work through all my uploads regarding this. But won't be able to start immediately, so request delay until at least midnight Tuesday 20 January -21 January for this item now tagged, and a week to work through all my uploads. (I will probably do it faster, but I have quite a few to look at.) Thanks.

I have no problem with commercial use in general, just don't want to find any of us being exploited. It would be upsetting to find my work printed worldwide and no share of the profits. Probability is low - there are a lot of better pictures than mine.

• Does Wikimedia have any standard wording to cover this?

-- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 19:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you could write "See below" (referring to the CC license below) Plrk (talk) 11:53, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Licence got changed to a free licence --D-Kuru (talk) 11:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]