Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spanish Republican Navy Naval Aviation fin flash (1931-1936).svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

modification of the historical shapes of Spanish Navy anchor, introducing personal anchor design ny User:FDRMRZUSA Xufanc (talk) 23:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is my svg version or variant for the png Spanish Navy anchor (it's loosely based on File:Fin flash of the Aeronáutica Naval.png). The svg anchor design respects the Spanish traditional military style for anchors: see

Where is the source for the Xufanc version in File:Fin flash of the Aeronáutica Naval.png ("source: own work")? The Xufanc version is without a source or reference: "double standard"? not "equal treatment under the law"? "the ox calling the donkey horned"?

>>> Anyway an alternative design version is not a valid reason for deletion, especially when these design differences are not serious enough to justify the deletion:

Colored dice with white background
My svg version.
Png version (by Xufanc).

The original nature of the design is not altered, It is clear that there are no significant differences for deletion: the only difference is that svg version design is more accurate than png version. (FDRMRZUSA, talk) 18:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC+1).

 Keep I do not understand how altering the design of the anchor warrants deletion. If one drawing is more accurate than the other, it should be the one that is used, but the use of DR is unneccessary. Fry1989 eh? 18:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep cant the anchors just be modified slightly instead of the whole file being removed? --Havsjö (talk) 18:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Underlying design is public domain due to age. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 15:49, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]