Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL foto, Eimar Kull - 7stEMANE-2.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2021 at 11:43:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:EL foto, Eimar Kull - 7stEMANE-2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL foto, Eimar Kull - 7stEMANE-2.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Geometridae (Geometer Moths)
•  Info created by Eimar Kull - uploaded & nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 11:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 11:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Really nice eye, but 7 images were not enough to get the body in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose per Charles.--Ermell (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support This one is sharp enough to me and a really interesting shot. Cmao20 (talk) 22:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Cmao20. I think this is a formidable achievement and enough of it is sharp and very detailed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 05:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment It is a female Agriopis aurantiaria, and they are somewhat rarely photographed. There is a strong sexual dimorphism and females don't fly. Due to that, and their small size, and naturally the camouflage color, then finding one is somewhat rare to begin with. And to me, that mouth seems perfectly in focus. The only thing that I noticed, when once again reviewing the image, was that in the lower edge of the photo there is some fuzziness from merging the shots. Maybe that part should be cropped out? Kruusamägi (talk) 17:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment Yes, I'm surprised that regulars Ikan Kekek Cmao20 Llez haven't noticed the obvious errors at the bottom. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! It's not that you mentioned that either. ;) Kruusamägi (talk) 15:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment I've learned to discount a degree of fuzziness that doesn't affect the subject. But would I like for the blurred part of the foreground to be cropped out? Yeah, that would definitely improve the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've now croped the image. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 22:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SM:!) (talk) 07:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]