Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Glasshouse and fountain at lalbagh.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2010 at 19:14:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Glasshouse and fountain at lalbagh.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Glasshouse and fountain at lalbagh.jpg

•  Info c/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Muhammad (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - MPF (talk) 20:13, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Nice crisp detail, great symmetry. Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Great! no distortion visible, intense colours too --Ikiwaner (talk) 05:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ghabara (talk) 17:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Excellent picture, great place.--Cayambe (talk) 16:32, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Too small imho. --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose As Berthold. Lycaon (talk) 11:32, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Ikiwaner.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose much too small (see Berthold Werner) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:23, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2,034,000 PX - that's above the lower size limit; agreed only just, but I don't think "much too small" is fair. - MPF (talk) 00:41, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Technically it is within the limits, but for an image with a lot of details one would expect a larger resolution, hence my comment of too small. Lycaon (talk) 07:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Neutral Idk, I think I'd like to see this bigger also, interesting colors but it's hard to tell what it is (and it might be cut off on the sides). --IdLoveOne (talk) 02:11, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak support Big size gets my full support --Reflection of Perfection (talk) 13:24, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • It still meets the size requirements --Muhammad (talk) 14:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]