Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Illustration Workshop   Map Workshop   Photography Workshop   Video and Sound Workshop  

Illustration workshop

Shortcuts

This workshop is part of the Graphics Lab, a project aimed at picture retouching to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. More information about the lab can be found on its main page and requests pages (Illustrations ; Photographs ; Maps ; Video and Sound). To ask questions or make a suggestions, see the talk page of the graphic lab page.

This specific page is the requests page for the Illustration Workshop. Anyone can make a request for an illustration to be created or improved. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.

Make a request

Show manual procedures

Use the following template when making a new request, replacing the examples with your image(s) and request(s):

<gallery>
 IMAGENAME.EXT|Description of image
 IMAGE#TWO.EXT|2nd image (If there is one)
 ETCETCETC.EXT|Don't request too many at once, though
</gallery>

;Request:
: Details of your request go here… --~~~~
;Graphist opinion(s):

See also

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 60 days. For the archive overview, see /Archive. The latest archive is located at /Archive/2024.

Modify the flag

Article(s): zh:野比大雄

Request
Reference: [1]. This is the flag that appears in the comic book, it has only a simple pattern. --Thyj (talk) 16:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)

i do not understand the request?-LadyofHats (talk) 12:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@LadyofHats: I believe that he wants an SVG version of the file and the link is provided as a reference. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:45, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
but the file in the gallery is already an svg.-LadyofHats (talk) 00:27, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Thyj: Could you please clarify what modification you are requesting? --Usernameunique (talk) 11:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Article(s): en:Absorption refrigerator and internat.

Request

Hi. I think the article (and all international version of the same article) would greatly benefit from some to replace the currently used images, that I don't find great (except the water spray, this one is fine to me). Something colored (the model is black and white), and internationally usable Gem fr (talk) 19:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)
@Gem fr: As the two images are so different I just want to make sure I understand what you want, something like this? Please ping me, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:45, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. This is so PERFECT. Just the needed thing @Goran tek-en: . Gem fr (talk) 09:26, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gem fr: This is not free either, I can do one for you as an svg but not until the first half of September, if you can wait. Otherwise I will leave this to someone else, it's up to you. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It sure can wait, no problem. Thanks for taking my request into consideration Gem fr (talk) 08:10, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Request taken by Goran tek-en (talk) 18:13, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gem fr: Is this video correct for what you want? --Goran tek-en (talk) 15:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en: Yes it is Gem fr (talk) 22:12, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gem fr: This is a draft just to get the overall picture and for me to get more information.
I need you to answer the questions and inform me if the statements below are correct, if not please inform me.

  • Is the overall pipes, containers correct, can the pipes be drawn in those angels and so on?
  • 1 is the boiler and are all four components present there?
  • 2 is were the ammonia gas is separated from the water and goes upwards.
  • 3 is the water returning and it is liquid here.
  • 4 is the evaporator and this is were the ammonia gas is transformed to liquid. It's cooled down here so it has to give away heat.
  • Is sodium chromate and hydrogen gas also present in the flow between 2 and 4? --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I dare say I like it, even as a draft, this is promising.
The piping is really good. The pipe between 1 and 2 works like a kind of pump: the boiling liquid generates bubbles that push the liquid upward from the chamber 1 to the chamber 2. So it should go down inside chamber 1 toward the heating element, and be filled with a bicolore zebra.
forget the sodium chromate, it is used only in a different kind of absorption refrigerator (large systems for building climatisation)
hydrogen is there only in the part of the drawing on the left side, the part with no color in the piping. Its role is only to balance pressure
so, to explicitly answer your question: chamber 1 contains only the water+ammonia liquid. Your draft is correct about 2, 3 and 4
great work @Goran tek-en: , keep going ! Gem fr (talk) 18:27, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gem fr: Draft 2.
Thanks for your information, I like the way you gave it, short explanation and then specific answers to my questions.
  • 1-4. I have made some changes so please check.
  • 5. Is it liquid ammonia here rinning down?
  • 6. I don't understand it here. Does ammonia liquid and hydrogen gas here, which direction, what form?
  • 7. Evaporator that gives of cold?
  • 8. Hyhydrogen gas rising?
  • 9. Container, how does hydrogen gas return to it? --Goran tek-en (talk) 10:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am delighted, @Goran tek-en: , it is so nice!
1-4 is perfect, no need to change anything. I like the radiating rays and snowflakes
5: no, liquid ammonia goes down 6, pulled down by gravity. This the place where hydrogen gas balance pressure between chamber 4 and 9. No movement here
6: liquid ammonia turn to gas here, this suck up latent heat of evaporation and generates the cold
8: ammonia, gas again is sucked down into 9
9: this the place where water suck up the gas ammonia.
(I am in a hurry, I come back in a few hours)Gem fr (talk) 11:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gem fr: Draft 3.
What happens 5-9? --Goran tek-en (talk) 16:46, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
in 9, important thing: there, the water (coming from pipe 3) absorbs the ammonia (gas coming from pipe 8); water loves ammonia, so ... sllllurp ! This allow the ammonia to complete the cycle, when the ammonia enriched water will go back to chamber 1. It also help evaporation of ammonia in 7 (lower partial pressure ->easier evaporation). the higher part of the chmaber is filled with gas (hydrogen and ammonia), the lower part by a liquid (water+ammonia) that will go back to chamber 1 (an arrow is required)
in 5, pretty much nothing, but it is needed to balance pressure. Since the ammonia gas is at higher temperature in chamber 2 and pipe going from 2 to 4 (increasing gas pressure), and since in chamber 9 water absorb the ammonia gas (lowering pressure), the pressure would be greater in the right part of the machine than in the left part, and trouble would ensue. The hydrogen is just a filler to balance things. You will find hydrogen pipe 5 (the whole of it) and chamber 9 (only the top, gassy, part), these are the place you will put the green color.
6 is just a pipe for liquid ammonia going down to chamber 7, by gravity
7 is where liquid ammonia turns to gas, absorbing heat
8 is the pipe for gas ammonia generated in chamber 7 to go in chamber 9
so it is almost finished, @Goran tek-en: , great job. Gem fr (talk) 17:19, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gem fr: This draft is just to show you how it will look if you put it on a colored background.

Draft 4 to be checked.
  • For all the pipes where there is liquid I haven't filled them to indicate this. I'm not sure if you have seen, just so you think it's OK.
  • Should there be any gas direction symbols in 5, if so which direction or both?
  • I have put a legend there but you will have to tell me what you want there.
  • The numbers is just for us at the moment so do you want numbers if so where?
  • We can do one numbered and one not numbered version if you like. Some editors wants the explanation for numbers in the info, some in the illustration. It's up to you. --Goran tek-en (talk) 15:11, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en: Would it be better to change ammonia liquid -> liquid ammonia? + water liquid should just be water. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:18, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
very nice, @Goran tek-en: , I could use it right now but I am sort of perfectionist so I will ask for a few minute things if you dont mind.
I think it would be better with some sort of wavy water line; these would in chamber 2 and 9, in each case just above the pipe 3 level
OTOH, I am nor sure this would be required for ammonia; the fact that you used slightly lighter color and wavy arrow for ammonia gas, and darker/straight arrow for liquid ammonia is enough for me. But the opinion of someone else would help, if they think it required
No arrow required in 5, IMHO.
We definitively need numbers, they are just fine as is. I have rather the number not in the info, I think it will allow for better internationalization
A small change in chamber 1 would be better: the heating device is sometime electric, sometimes a gas burner, and in both case it is rather vertical, wrapped around the pipe that will be go to chamber 2 (so this pipe enter inside chamber 1, and it also enter a few cm into chamber 2
I will be off a few days, in between if someone else could have a look it would be perfect. Thanks for the great job anyway. Gem fr (talk) 08:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gem fr: Draft 5.
Once we are done I will need the following;
  • Name of the file
  • Description (/language)
  • Captions/s (/language)
  • Category/ies at commons
to be able to upload it at commons. If you don'y know about Captions read here.--Goran tek-en (talk) 17:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gem fr: I need your feedback as above to be able to upload it or maybe you still are off, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 11:13, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was off longer than planned (gee, 2 weeks already?), and just came back.
This is just perfect for me. great job, @Goran tek-en: .
The name could be Absorption_refrigerator_working
description : working of an ammonia/water absorption refrigerator
Captions as follow ( en / fr / de -- My German is not good enough, so some of these are missing)
1: boiler / bouilleur / Austreiber
2: separation chamber / séparateur /
3: ammonia-poor water back-pipe / retour d'eau appauvrie en ammoniac / Wasser
4: ammonia condenser / condensateur d'ammoniac / Kondensator
5: pressure balance pipe / équilibrage des pressions
6: liquid ammonia pipe / conduite d'ammoniac liquide
7: evaporator (inside cabinet) / évaporateur (intérieur du frigo) / Verdampfer
8: ammonia gas pipe / tuyau d'ammoniac
9: absorber (water absorbs ammonia) / absorbeur (l'eau absorbe l'ammoniac) / Absorptionkammer
(these captions are just my propositions, feel free to change them, of course)
categories would be the same (or equivalent for commons. I am not familiar with these) than the main article, that is: Thermodynamic cycles / Heat pumps / Cooling technology/ Heating, ventilating, and air conditioning / Gas technologies
Gem fr (talk) 13:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gem fr: I don't really understand what you mean when you want the number descriptions to be in captions. Captions is like description but it can be search by a webb browser outside of commons. So where do you want the number descriptions, in Description? --Goran tek-en (talk) 15:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en: .My bad, I misunderstood. The number description will be fine in Description, yes. I will have to understand captions first to tell you anything worthwhile about them Gem fr (talk) 16:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gem fr: I didn't put out the German as it was not complete. Also you should check the French description as it's just a google translate, and all the rest of the info. I don't know why there is a bigger difference between 8 and 9, it's nothing there and I tried different ways.
Now you can find it here file:Absorption refrigerator working.svg. If you are happy with this please put the code {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} on this request so it can be archived, thanks. ✓ Done --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
YES ! YES ! YES ! CHEERS !  Goran tek-en

✓ Done

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Gem fr (talk) 18:47, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Sutton Hoo helmet designs 1 & 5

Article(s): Sutton Hoo helmet

Request
Could somebody please create versions of designs 1 and 5 from the Sutton Hoo helmet? Examples can be seen here (page 8 of the pdf), but I can email a high quality version from which to trace. Ideally these should result in something similar to File:Sutton Hoo helmet fig4.svg, which LadyofHats kindly did earlier. --Usernameunique (talk) 18:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)

 Request taken by Goran tek-en (talk) 18:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Usernameunique: But I will need feedback and info from you or it will not work for me. I would like the high quality versions also, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Goran tek-en, I look forward to it. Just sent you an email, using the email address in the link from your userpage. I'm more than happy to provide feedback and information. Why don't you take a look at the images, and then let me know what you think? I suspect that it will probably be easier to start with Design 5, but let me know if you think otherwise. --Usernameunique (talk) 18:32, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Usernameunique: For d5, do you want it like File:Sutton Hoo helmet fig4.svg so that I use the same colors etc?
For d1 I really need to know more exactly which part of that illustration you want, if you can mark on a screen print or similar it would be great, and then same question as above. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Goran tek-en, please make both design 1 and design 5 like File:Sutton Hoo helmet fig4.svg, with the same colors, etc. For design 1, please make the entire image that you see on page 186; I just sent you a cropped version, for clarity. The one thing to keep in mind is the distinction between the "known" design and the "reconstructed" design. In the book, the distinction is shown by outlining the reconstructed parts in dotted lines, and making them a lighter gray. That's basically fine. (If erring on the side of a more obvious distinction or a less obvious distinction, I would err on the side of a more obvious distinction.) Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 20:59, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Usernameunique: Draft for D5, feedback thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 16:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That looks fantastic, thanks Goran tek-en! I don't see anything to improve upon. --Usernameunique (talk) 21:53, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Usernameunique: I forgot one thing I intended to do. If you look at the source the snakes bodies has shadows on them so they were kind of rounded. I forgot to add that but check the to drafts here and tell me which you want before I make it on all the snakes.
I think we should add shadows on the snakes bodies, tell which you want. --Goran tek-en (talk) 16:43, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Usernameunique: Draft with snake shadows.
If this is OK I will need the following;
  • Name of the file
  • Description (/language)
  • Captions/s (/language)
  • Category/ies at commons
to be able to upload it at commons. If you don'y know about Captions read here.--Goran tek-en (talk) 10:29, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looks great, Goran tek-en. Thanks again. File name: File:Sutton Hoo helmet fig5.svg. English description: Design 5 from the Sutton Hoo helmet, retraced and vectorized from p. 202 of The Sutton Hoo Ship-Burial, vol. 2 (1978). Caption: Pattern from design 5 on the Sutton Hoo helmet. Category: Sutton Hoo helmet. --Usernameunique (talk) 16:41, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, Goran tek-en, if you haven't started working on design 1 yet, how would you feel about a slightly different method? I've been thinking it might make more sense to show the full design without any differentiation between the "known" design and the "reconstructed" design. Then, a second file could remove all the "reconstructed" portions, leaving only the "known" parts (somewhat similar to this file, where just the known parts are shown), and the reader could toggle between the two (like with these two designs). --Usernameunique (talk) 23:11, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First @Usernameunique: now you can find design5 here file:Sutton Hoo helmet fig5.svg.
I will make the different known and unknown separately and then we can decide on how to upload them as we can test and see.
  • For design 1: in the two previous ones there is a very light background grey and to me that represent the helmet and will do so also in this. If this is correct I will have to introduce another "color". My question is should we stick to different shades of grey or add a soft color? --Goran tek-en (talk) 09:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't know if you did see this as I added it with out a new signing, For design 1: in the two previous ones there is a very light background grey and to me that represent the helmet and will do so also in this. If this is correct I will have to introduce another "color". My question is should we stick to different shades of grey or add a soft color? --Goran tek-en (talk) 19:01, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Usernameunique: That is so impressive, the original was made all by hand by very skilled craftsmen. I also do sculpted jewelry in silver and slate so I understand what it takes to produce something like that, woooh, thanks for showing that image to me it helps me. --Goran tek-en (talk) 13:11, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Very cool, Goran tek-en, I'd love to see some of your jewelry if you have pictures. The designs on the Sutton Hoo helmet were made with a form of die stamping known as pressblech, where individual dies (like this one) were crafted by hand, and then used to stamp sheets of tinned bronze. If you're interested, there's a discussion of the technique here (pp. 109–114). --Usernameunique (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Usernameunique: Draft for D1_1. This is a draft before I continue to check so this is all right with you. Right figure known parts, feed back, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 16:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Goran tek-en. That looks really good. Stylistically, I think it's perfect. Two minor nits on the details: first, part of the forearm is actually crossed over by the left figure, so shouldn't be visible. Second, the nose and mouth are actually visible in the fragment (see p. 188, figure 142c in the chapter I emailed you), though I agree the drawing in the book does not make this clear. --Usernameunique (talk) 22:56, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Usernameunique: For the arm, as I haven't made the left figure yet I don't know exactly where it crosses over so that will come.
In this figure the nose and mouth are dashed, not established, so which should we trust? --Goran tek-en (talk) 15:46, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense, Goran tek-en. I would include the nose and mouth. I just emailed you a few more pictures—photographs and drawings of the fragments (i.e., the "known" portions of the design)—which both show the nose and mouth. I'm not sure why in the first illustration they are only dashed. --Usernameunique (talk) 21:59, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Usernameunique: You really have to check them for everything, they are quite complicated, three different ways to show them.
Goran tek-en, those look really, really good. Thank you! I've studied them closely, and there's nothing I can see to change. In fact, the one way it appears to break from the design in the original (the angle of the "\\\" on the headdress of the figure on the left) is, I think, an improvement; the original was unsymmetrical, probably by mistake. Likewise, the decision to use two different colors, gold and silver, to differentiate the known/reconstructed portions of the design is a nice touch. In addition to the above three designs, would you mind creating a fourth, identical to "Draft for both_d1," but all in silver (i.e., no differentiation between known/reconstructed)? --Usernameunique (talk) 15:03, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Usernameunique: I know there are some small differences on the left figure compared to the original image. But as they were made by die stamping method I thought that left right should be almost the same. I don't know if they made two different die's, left right, or if the could make a mirrored version of the first they made. Any way, when you stamp like that it's almost impossible to get two that look exactly the same, there is always some difference in the force you apply, angel, you slip, etc. I used the right figure also for the left but I changed it to fit the original image for the bigger differences. I can do the fourth version but in mean while you can gather the information below for all four versions.
I will need the following;
  • Name of the file
  • Description (/language)
  • Captions/s (/language)
  • Category/ies at commons
to be able to upload it at commons. If you don'y know about Captions read here.--Goran tek-en (talk) 16:27, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Goran tek-en, that makes sense. It was almost certainly made with one die, but the sides were likely similar. In a testament to the skill of the artisans who created these stamps, a fragment of a similar design found in another grave (image) is identical within a few millimeters.
Draft for both_d1: Name: Sutton Hoo helmet fig1 - known & reconstructed.svg | Description: Reconstructed design 1 from the Sutton Hoo helmet, showing known portions of the design in silver, and reconstructed portions in gold | Caption: Reconstructed design from the Sutton Hoo helmet | Category:Sutton Hoo helmet
Draft for confirmed_d1: Name: Sutton Hoo helmet fig1 - known.svg | Description: Reconstructed design 1 from the Sutton Hoo helmet, showing portions known from fragments of the design | Caption: Fragmentary design from the Sutton Hoo helmet | Category:Sutton Hoo helmet
Draft for unconfirmed_d1: Name: Sutton Hoo helmet fig1 - reconstructed.svg | Description: Inferred portions of design 1 from the Sutton Hoo helmet | Caption: Reconstructed fragmentary design from the Sutton Hoo helmet | Category:Sutton Hoo helmet
Fourth version: Name: Sutton Hoo helmet fig1 - full.svg | Description: Reconstructed design 1 from the Sutton Hoo helmet, incorporating portions known from fragments as well as conjectural portions | Caption: Reconstructed design from the Sutton Hoo helmet | Category:Sutton Hoo helmet --Usernameunique (talk) 16:52, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Usernameunique: You are to fast, will take some days for me. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, Goran tek-en. No rush. --Usernameunique (talk) 23:42, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Usernameunique: Now you can find them here;

Check all the information because I was confused there for a while. If you are happy with this please put the code {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} on this request so it can be archived, thanks. ✓ Done --Goran tek-en (talk) 10:36, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Usernameunique (talk) 04:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Map of Revenge of the Mummy ride (Hollywood)

Article(s): en:Revenge of the Mummy

Request
Freer version of the map seen in this link (image) can be created, especially without non-free elements seen in the original map. --George Ho (talk) 00:44, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)


Lambeosaurus species comparison

Article(s): fi:Lambeosaurus

Request
It would be nice to have the colour and pattern of the illustration on the left changed, to make it clear that it's separate from the species next to it. Doesn't matter how it gets done, as long as it stays realistic for a dinosaur. --Paranaja (talk) 14:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
altered the colours (but then, stupidly, uploaded to the same file as an update. Paranaja does this look ok? Otherwise will revert and try different colours tonight. Ian Furst (talk) 17:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's not bad, but what I was thinking of was a complete overhaul, like actually changing out the colours and contrasts to different ones. If that's possible, it would be really nice. --Paranaja (talk) 22:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've reverted the image, and am playing with it but because of the amount of blur it's not easy (for me). If someone else can do it, would appreciate it otherwise I'll keep playing. Ian Furst (talk) 01:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ian Furst would it be easier to do the colouring based on this draft version of the drawing? --Paranaja (talk) 09:41, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to have to admit defeat on this one. Short of attempting to redraw all the sketch, I can't recolour without it looking horrible. The problem (for me) is I can't remove enough of the jpeg artifact to take away the white background. If I could do that, I could colour on the layer deep to the sketch. Otherwise, I have to overlay a colour redraw which I don't have the talent for. Sorry. Ian Furst (talk) 14:58, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you for trying. --Paranaja (talk) 14:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Paranaja: I changed the two to the left, I'm not sure if it only should be the bottom one so tell me. Draft to check, do you mean something like this. Feedback thanks, please ping me. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en: It's only the bottom one. If I understand correctly what you are doing, seems like a good start. What I mean is that the colours should be done from scratch and with patterns different from the illustrations to the right. --Paranaja (talk) 18:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Paranaja: If one changes both colors and patterns the image will change so much that it may not be possible to really see what it should be. I have three different drafts here.
Feedback thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 16:54, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en: What I mean with patterns is not that the illustration should be covered in texture, but that different areas of the illustration should have different colours. In your previous sketch, you had removed the colours. What you could do now is to colour the image, similar to what the original author did based on a pencil illustration, but with different colours in different places. --Paranaja (talk) 17:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the illustration to the right, it looks completely different from the middle one. The one on the left should also look completely different from the two others. --Paranaja (talk) 17:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Paranaja: Please ping me, thanks. Images are really hard to discuss with text, just you know what image you have in your head. New draft. --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en: Ok, it should be something like this but more professionally coloured. --Paranaja (talk) 20:55, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Paranaja: To me what you show here this is the same as the other heads, especially the one down to the right. To my understanding it doesn't correlate to what you have described before, I think that's why both Ian Furst and I did something totally different. New draft 5. --Goran tek-en (talk) 10:45, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en: I apologise for not uploading a clarifying image right in the beginning. Your new draft is looking pretty good, feel free to upload it when you are happy with it. The contrast could be reduced a little bit and the leopard patterning could be made less obvious. --Paranaja (talk) 13:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Request taken by Goran tek-en (talk) 15:07, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Paranaja: New draft 6, feedbackthanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 15:07, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en: Lighter green would be better and the border between the red crest and the green head could be less obvious. --Paranaja (talk) 10:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Paranaja: New draft 7, feedbackthanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Paranaja: I do need feedback as per above to be able to continue this. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en: Oh yeah.. A lighter green would maybe fit better and the transition between the red and green could be smoother. --Paranaja (talk) 18:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Paranaja: Draft 8. --Goran tek-en (talk) 10:22, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en: I don't remember what the previous image looked like, but the green could still be lighter, similar to the image that I posted. --Paranaja (talk) 15:18, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Paranaja: Draft 9. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrations by Yuen-Ji

Article(s): [[]]

Request
First and second image is blurred, for technical reasons. Please try to refer to the style of the original.--Thyj (talk) 03:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)


Bicycle and car together

Article(s): (multiple articles)

Request
To illustrate the use of the instrumental case in the Serbian language, I need an SVG illustration showing a person riding a bicycle, and next to it, the same person riding a car with the same bicycle affixed to the roof. I would have done it myself, but I can't find a person riding a bicycle in Category:SVG bicycles drawn in the same style as Category:SVG profile drawings of automobiles. --Nikola (talk) 08:07, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can you specify which car you would (ideally) like this done with? Will it have any labels? I'm not sure what you mean by "...the instrumental case..." Ian Furst (talk) 15:01, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Any that is large enough to fit a bicycle on the roof, for example File:VW Golf 2 profile drawing.svg. For an example of how the fitting looks like, see [2]. The car needs no labels, I will add the text to the image myself. For the case, see w:Instrumental case. Nikola (talk) 12:00, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)


Vectorization of coat of arms of Institution Notre-Dame

Article(s): fr:Institution Notre-Dame (Valenciennes), de:Institution Notre-Dame

Request
Please vectorize this French academic coat of arms and create an SVG file. --37.58.201.72 11:59, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)

May I kindly ask why the request hasn't been taken yet - it has been more than a month now :( Is there a problem with the file? 37.58.201.72 11:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Ceremonial Canadian Red Ensigns (Please create)

Article(s): Various

Request
Please recreate these flags and add the Crown of Saint Edward (Heraldry) to the top of coat of arms so we have the ceremonial Canadian red ensign flags.
Please add the Crown of Saint Edward (Heraldry) to the top of coat of arms in each of the flags and title the new svg files as ceremonial Canadian Red ensign flags. (2A02:C7F:5622:2000:216C:3818:D727:B709 15:39, 7 October 2019 (UTC))[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
Why hasnt this request been processed yet, it’s been up for almost two weeks and nothing has happened. (2A02:C7F:5622:2000:59F6:FBFB:9690:9BF4 08:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC))[reply]


Fix the proposed flags of Malaya (1949)

Article(s): wikipedia:Flag of Malaysia

Request
Please fix the proposed flags of Malaya.
The current flags in Wikimedia Commons isn't as what the designs looked like as shown in the newspaper cutting from The Malay Mail and Utusan Melayu dated 15th November 1949 and 16th November 1949 respectively, as seen in page 15 of this document [3]. --EmpAhmadK (talk) 05:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
Kindly elaborate what changes are sought? the images in right hand column is same as that in news paper referenced. --06:34, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Apologies, I just realised that I'm at the wrong place. I was suggesting that the image be changed to the new one I made, but I just realised that this is to request for an illustration and not what I thought it was at first.


Old flag and coat of arms of the Bahamas

Article(s): various

Request
This emblem was used by the Bahamas from 1964 to 1973, I urgently created this file by referencing another file. So I would be grateful if you could remake this emblem in more detail. --Tcfc2349 (talk) 08:11, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And please refer to this file and this photo when remaking. There are also additional new files found. Thank you. --Tcfc2349 (talk) 08:11, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
I want to keep the crown intact. Please correct the other part. Thank you. --Tcfc2349 (talk) 08:35, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I also found a photo of a detailed enlargement of the inner part of the emblem a while ago. Please refer to it. --Tcfc2349 (talk) 08:51, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Convert presidential standards of Kenya to SVG

Article(s): various

Request
These flags are Kenya's presidential standards, so thank you for converting them to SVG. --Tcfc2349 (talk) 06:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
 Request taken by Tcfc2349 (talk) 11:57, 13 October 2019 (UTC); First, I made my own Mwai Kibaki's flag. --Tcfc2349 (talk) 11:57, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Enrico Berlinguer flag

Article(s): en:Enrico Berlinguer

Request
Would it be possible to get an SVG rendition of this flag, commonly displayed by leftist associations in Italy?--Carnby (talk) 10:57, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)

Coat of arms of the State of Pasundan

Article(s): [[]]

Request
Please vectorize this coat of arms. --Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 00:56, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)


Article(s): en:League of Legends

Request
Make a vector version of new League of Legends logo. Source: https://cdn57.androidauthority.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/League-of-Legends-Wild-rift-featured-712x400.jpg --49.146.7.209 19:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)


Teamfight Tactics

Article(s): en:Teamfight Tactics

Request
Make a vector version --Arianator with love (talk) 22:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)


Vectorize proposed Macau flags to SVG

Article(s): en:Flag of Macau

Request
Please vectorize these files of formerly proposed flags for Macau. --TextClick (talk) 06:29, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)

 Request taken by NikNaks talk - gallery - wikipedia 10:59, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Logo's

Hello friends. I have an activ on Azeribaijani Viкipedia. At the moment, I am rewriting articles about government agencies included in the Government of Azerbaijan. But there are some problems with logos. Not all logos are on Commons. Most of the logos are only on the websites of government agencies. Internet logos are very poor quality. Therefore, I decided to apply to you for the development of logos of government agencies. The Government consists of 30 government agencies. Preparing their logos Who can help me ? :-) I want to show you an example. You have to maкe a logo on this site. Logo. The logo quality is excellent. Could it be simply increased in size ? To the right of the logo should be the full name of the state body. I'll mention their names here. Who can help me with this long-term activity ? :-) CalalC99 (talк) 20:28, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in font specimen

Article(s): en:Roboto

Request
"Fudgedicles" should be changed to "Fudgesicles". Refer to the enwiki discussion. --Opencooper (talk) 20:43, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
@Opencooper: my suggestion for svg:
perhabs @JoKalliauer: would have a look? --Mrmw (talk) 08:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<svg width="600" height="680" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 600 680" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" font-family="Roboto,Roboto Regular">
 <text x="20" y="145" font-size="150px" font-weight="100" font-family="Roboto Thin,Roboto">Roboto</text>
 <text x="20" y="225" font-size="85px" font-weight="900" font-variant="small-caps">SUNGLASSES</text>
 <text x="20" y="270" font-size="30px" font-style="italic">Self-driving robot ice cream truck</text>
 <text x="20" y="325" font-size="50px" font-weight="bold">Fudgesicles only 25¢</text>
 <text x="20" y="415" font-size="90px" font-weight="bold" font-stretch="condensed" font-family="Roboto Condensed,Roboto">ICE CREAM</text>
 <text x="20" y="465" font-size="40px" font-weight="500" font-family="Roboto Medium,Roboto">Marshmallows &amp; almonds</text>
 <text x="20" y="545" font-size="75px" font-weight="300" font-family="Roboto Light,Roboto">#9876543210</text>
 <text x="20" y="605" font-size="50px" font-weight="bold" font-style="italic">Music around the block</text>
 <text x="20" y="645" font-size="25px">Summer heat rising up from the boardwalk</text>
</svg>
@Mrmw: The font doesn't seem to be the same though. + I made some changes to the code 110px -> 90px. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Mrmw: since it is a typeface-example it has to be converted to {{Path text SVG}} and Roboto is not installed on Wikimedia.
@大诺史: File:Roboto (typeface).svg is a font-example for font-family="Roboto", therefore it has to be the same correct font, otherwise the file is useless.
I think we should use File:Test.svg. Remove the left description and make the text black.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 19:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Article(s): w:en:Pernod Ricard, w:fr:Pernod Ricard, etc

Request
I updated the colors and uploaded File:Pernod Ricard logo 2019.svg but now noticed that the font also changed. Can this be adjusted? (please overwrite Pernod Ricard logo 2019.svg) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:01, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
@Alexis Jazz: used logo from https://www.pernod-ricard.com/en/download/file/fid/10400/
✓ Done --Mrmw (talk) 15:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]