Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: Difference between revisions

* I support [[User:Ymblanter]]'s idea of undoing the AE deletion of the page, based on the apparent consensus of admins in this thread. Arbcom is still debating whether 'AE deletion' can ever be considered to be an option, but there is no risk of any conflict with Arbcom if the present deletion is simply undone on the merits. (We would be closing as though AE deletion was really allowed, but this *particular* deletion was reversed through the normal AE appeal process). It appears that [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2019_February_24 a deletion review has already occurred] which supported restoration of the page. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 18:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

* I indeed closed it as overturn, and subsequently got strong objections from Goldenring concerning the restoration of the page (see their talk page), which I disagree with, but it is good to let another administrator a chance to deal with this.--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 10:50, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

 

==Icewhiz==