Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 952:
it is rather plain to see that a user named "microsupporter" is here to advance a personal opinion about micronations, rather than to contribute to the articles in the spirit of an encyclopedia. especially when they attack editors they disagree with. [[User:ValarianB|ValarianB]] ([[User talk:ValarianB|talk]]) 16:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 
I agree that some of the stubs like Liberland Press are not notable enough to have own article, but your behaviour is not convenient even more. I tend to agree that bias as a label this user used is adequate description, But there is no way to prove it other than some inquiry about all of the actions you made by some college of Wikipedians, which is not realistic to happen. Thereof I see using bias-description as just a normal opinion of a Wikipedian about your edits which is fine. As we see that you are person who is opposing traditional micronation infobox on Wikipedia used for years and MicroSupporer supports it, you both shouldn't be involved in this dispute and leave it for impartial editors. It is perfectly okay to have a concern about your purge of the infoboxes you are involved in. People should be concerned with ongoing village pump RfC about this topic, which is participated by well-known company of editors, thats true. People should invite impartial Wikipedians to there, because most of them didn't even noticed it and it is again discussed only by certain kind of users. --[[User:ThecentreCZ|ThecentreCZ]] ([[User talk:ThecentreCZ|talk]]) 17:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 
== Follow up from [[WP:VPM#A personal analysis and proposal|VPM]]: topic ban proposal for Rachel Helps ==