Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions

:* '''Support ban.''' MicroSupporter is very clearly [[WP:NOTHERE]] to write an encyclopedia. He is aggressively pushing a POV, to the point of edit warring on behalf of the inclusion of patent original research, unacceptably shitty self-published primary sources, and known conspiracist disinformation blogs. He has responded to [[WP:CANVASSING]] on his talk page by agreeing to be part (or remain part) of a coordinated bias-pushing brigade. When called out, he explodes into bursts of ad hominems and ad populums. He has a long and colourful history of being unwilling to learn. I was willing to remain on the sidelines until ten minutes ago but his demonstrable untruths here in this thread and his most recent dumb edit war have pushed me, to slightly mix metaphors, off the fence. [[User:GR Kraml|GR Kraml]] ([[User talk:GR Kraml|talk]]) 13:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

:*:Self published primary sources? The information on the infobox shows nothing but the size of the claimed area, the flag and the coat of arms, all of which is in your newly proposed article anyway. An infobox shows information already visible in the article but just makes it easier to access. I do not understand why you and @[[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] are so upset over the existence of an infobox and don't just wait for WP:VPP to be resolved. What self published sources did I ever add to the infobox by the way? This is misleading. [[User:MicroSupporter|MicroSupporter]] ([[User talk:MicroSupporter|talk]]) 13:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

 

== Follow up from [[WP:VPM#A personal analysis and proposal|VPM]]: topic ban proposal for Rachel Helps ==