Tree swallow: Difference between revisions

Higher quality female tree swallows (as measured by laying date) are able to maintain their reproductive effort while diverting resources to fight an immune challenge. Lower quality swallows are less able to do so; a 2005 study in Ithaca, New York, found that late-laying females with an artificially enlarged brood, although able to maintain offspring quality, had lower responses to an immune challenge than those that were of higher quality or did not have an enlarged brood.<ref name="Ardia2005a">{{cite journal|last1=Ardia|first1=Daniel R.|title=Individual quality mediates trade-offs between reproductive effort and immune function in tree swallows|journal=Journal of Animal Ecology|volume=74|issue=3|year=2005|pages=517–524|issn=0021-8790|doi=10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00950.x}}</ref> Whether a female chooses to prioritize offspring quality or immunocompetence is likely related to survival probabilities; a 2005 study discovered that females with an enlarged brood in Alaska, where survival rates are lower, had weaker immune responses, but kept reproductive effort steady, whereas those in Tennessee, with higher survival rates, had a stronger response but lower quality offspring.<ref name="Ardia2005b">{{cite journal|last1=Ardia|first1=Daniel R.|title=Tree swallows trade off immune function and reproductive effort differently across their range|journal=Ecology|volume=86|issue=8|year=2005|pages=2040–2046|issn=0012-9658|doi=10.1890/04-1619|url=https://semanticscholar.org/paper/ceb2f53c7f4d6572a2a43bb2463dda076ed6fb84}}</ref>

 

 

==Status==