Alpha Quadrant

Please see the archives to the right for older messages.

I definitely remember when you were active. I appreciate the contributions you made here, wish that you would return, but respect your decision. I wish you well. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Creating a Article. Since you had some involvement with the Creating a Article redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 11:34, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:National Registered Agents, Inc. (logo).png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:34, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've added you to the page above because of how much you've done for us and because you've retired. It's intended to memorialize your service to this project, and I agree: This place is getting more hostile by the day, and it's unfortunate because we even had one hell of a hard worker just walk out on us for the exact same reason. Can't we all just get along?

Anyway, if you don't want to be on this list, just remove yourself and use an edit summary e.g. "I do not wish to be on this list; please keep me off". That way if other editors come looking to put you on the list after you've been taken off, they'll see that edit summary and decide not to add you. Of course, if you do decide to come back, then you'll still have to take yourself off the list anyway. ;)

God bless, LazyBastardGuy 02:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

LazyBastardGuy: Alpha was already two times on that list and he wanted to be removed, see [1]. Maybe simply commenting him out with an HTML notice? mabdul 14:51, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

ATTENTION: Alpha Quadrant has already been added to the list and has kindly asked to be removed before. If you came here looking to add this user, please refrain as they have requested not to be added in the past. Thank you.

Dear Wikipedia Ambassador,

I am seeking input on your experience as a mentor to new Wikipedians. This survey is designed to provide insight for the development of a new mentorship support tool on Wikipedia. If you have a moment, please take this survey, it should not take more than 10 minutes of your time to complete.

https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_4V2SSrhU2NFOVAV

Also, if you are able to, I would greatly appreciate it if you would send the following survey to the mentee you worked with:

https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_4V1quUdMZ1By3Ah

Thank you in advance for your participation, Gabriel Mugar 13:33, 25 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

hi, Hi, can you make a comment about my new project Encyclopine.org?

Hello Alpha Quadrant. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).Reply

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.

We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.

If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.

Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)

Three years ago, you were the 30th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style. We miss you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for coming over and chat --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:15, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Four years ago, you were recipient no. 30 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I just wanted to drop by and say you are very much missed. I hope you return to regular editing. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Hammersoft, I do miss it here. Looking back, I learned much while here on the project both from you and others. Learning copyright law from you for instance. Heh, I didn't take that too well at the time, but more and more I've grown to appreciate how helpful it has been both while I was on the project and even in life outside of the project. In many ways, the positive aspects did outweigh the negative. Unfortunately, I don't have as much time to devote work on the project as I once did. Though, as you can see, I'm not completely gone...receiving a CSD notice certainly will draw me out haha. Someday I will be back to regular editing, this I promise. Thanks for stopping by with the note. Best wishes, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 05:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

• Yeah we didn't hit it off well at the start. But, one of the things I always appreciated about you is that you kept an open mind and were willing to consider other alternatives, even if you initially radically disagreed with them. That is a rare thing around these parts. I look forward to your return and hope all is well in your life. --Hammersoft (talk) 11:25, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Toyloa. Since you had some involvement with the Toyloa redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 00:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dirt track racing in Canada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Magicsan (talk) 15:35, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect GOVCOM. Since you had some involvement with the GOVCOM redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. NE Ent 03:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) This is an informational posting only and I am not watching this page; contact me on my user talk page if you wish to communicate with me about this. via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Conan the Conqueror (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.

First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.

Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.

Best regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) This is an informational posting only and I am not watching this page; contact me on my user talk page if you wish to communicate with me about this. Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Sankalp logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:ArabCrunch logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello Alpha Quadrant,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Angela O'Connell for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

• (talk page stalker) @Onel5969: I've denied the speedy deletion nomination. What was on the article was, agreed, vandalism/hoax. But, Alpha Quadrant didn't create that. What Alpha created was a legitimate redirect for a real character in the Fair City television show. Onel5969, I know you meant well but in the future check the article's history before tagging for speedy deletion. All the best, --Hammersoft (talk) 19:30, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to take up space on your wall, but I hate to continue conversations in different locations. Hammersoft - I did check out the history, thank you for the agf. However, did you check out the target of the redirect? There is no Angela O'Connell listed on the target, therefore I felt deletion was the more appropriate course of action. Perhaps I missed it. And the notification announcement above is computer generated. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

• I did check out the target of the redirect. Thanks for your agf :) I know she's not listed there. However, I did confirm this character is part of the show. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:18, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

That's cool Hammersoft, although regarding agf, I was referring to you reverting my edit and labeling it vandalism. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:31, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

• I was referring to the IP, not you. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:34, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:AfC submissions declined as blank, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Category:AfC submissions declined as blank and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Category:AfC submissions declined as blank during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 22:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Software companies of the United States by state, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Light2021 (talk) 14:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

• Gm2016 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey Alpha Quadrant, I noticed you rejected my "Citizens For Responsible Energy Solutions" submission because it read as an advertisement and did not have third party sources. First, thank you for your advice, but I'm wondering if you can give me more tips for how to revise this submission. I don't reference the Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions website more than once and reference sources such as McClatchy, Associated Press, Yale, Morning Consult, WMUR and Politico which are reputable. How can this draft be improved? Thank you in advance for your help.

Gm2016 (talk) 20:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

This article primarily has two issues that need to be addressed:

1. The article needs to establish that this organization warrants a standalone article. Specifically, is this organization covered sufficiently in reputable third party sources (books, newspaper articles, academic journals, online news articles, etc. I think this subject very much does have that potential. At the very least, the topic warrants a section in an existing article. A big problem is existing references; for instance E&E/Greenwire. Any online source with "wire" in the name is almost always paid news (first party sources). The fact that these sources are also behind a paywall also reduces our ability to verify information stated in the article. Your best reference is very much the Huffington Post news article, we are looking for more coverage like THAT (see Wikipedia:In Depth Coverage). The news article exists because the organization exists. They are giving us detailed information on the organization, the news source wasn't paid to make the news article, and the organization isn't just a passing mention. In contrast, the Associated Press news article doesn't contribute to establishing this organization's notability. The biggest reason being the fact that this article is a passing reference (the primary focus of the news article is Kelly Ayotte and Clean Energy). If we can get 4-5 more news articles like the Huffington Post article, then we will have a very solid base for establishing this organization's notability.
2. The article also needs to be written in a [WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]. This is perhaps one of the most difficult skills to learn about writing Wikipedia articles because of the fact that it is so different from writing anywhere else. To write in neutral point of view you want to present the facts, do so in a manner that is neither positive nor negative, and avoid any language that would promote the subject. Take the perspective of a historian writing about this organization 1,000 years from now. What you're doing is documenting the subject so that others may learn about the subject. For example, right now in the "About" section of the article you have:

Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions (CRES) was founded in 2013 to promote clean energy solutions. As an organization, CRES does not favor one form of clean energy over another, but aims to engage lawmakers across the United states in a discussion about clean energy policies that address America’s 21st century economic, environmental and national security needs.

Consider possibly rewording it to something along these lines:

Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions (CRES) is an American non-profit advocacy group that that lobbies for the expansion of the clean energy industry in the United States. CRES was founded in 2013 and has lobbied for legislation such as <Expansion here>.

Both sentences say about the same thing, but the latter strips out the verbiage that would make it read like an advertisement (Example: "promotes solutions", "aims to engage", and "address needs"). I hope this has been helpful for you. If you have any further questions, then I would be happy to assist. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 23:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply