Wikisource:Administrators: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Confirmation discussions: calledvote=1 |
|||
Line 223:
::{{support}} ''both'' GrafZahl and TalBot. --[[User:Zyephyrus|Zyephyrus]] ([[User talk:Zyephyrus|talk]]) 16:29, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
::{{support}} ''both''--[[User:Ineuw|Ineuw]] ([[User talk:Ineuw|talk]]) 18:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
===Inductiveload===
Line 230 ⟶ 231:
::{{support}} --[[User:Zyephyrus|Zyephyrus]] ([[User talk:Zyephyrus|talk]]) 16:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
::{{support}}--[[User:Ineuw|Ineuw]] ([[User talk:Ineuw|talk]]) 18:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
===ResidentScholar===
{{admin confirmation|ResidentScholar|active|Admin since January 2008}}
:{{oppose}} in full expectation Ineuw will double-out-vote me again. [[User:AuFCL|AuFCL]] ([[User talk:AuFCL|talk]]) 08:20, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
:{{Oppose}}. A valued editor, but unsuited as an admin. [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne|talk]]) 13:14, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Line 240 ⟶ 242:
:::I was not comfortable with the tone they used [https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:William_Maury_Morris_II&diff=4938390&oldid=4936673 here] but mostly the conspiracy accusation in the ensuing [https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hesperian&diff=4938685&oldid=4938605 discussion]. The earlier block fiasco is not yet 12 months old and I’m not quite over that. There is a price to be paid for tacitly accepting or normalising recurring bad judgements as ''so-and-so is a bit prickly, best to ignore...''. [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne|talk]]) 08:08, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
:::* Also [https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Wikisource%3AScriptorium&diff=4957376&oldid=4956552 this edit] is not what I would expect from anyone representing the community. [[User:Jeepday|Jeepday]] <small>([[User talk:Jeepday|talk]])</small> 10:06, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
==Nominations for adminship==
| |||