User:Egm4313.s12.team16.r1

Report 1:

edit

By: Team 16

R1.1

edit

File:R1.1.jpg


From Figure: Mass, Spring, Damper system with spring and damper in parallel


First, we take the + y direction to be downward and z to be out of the page. Within this coordinate system, the displacement is described as a vector quantity y with the velocity and acceleration of the system denoted by   and   respectively.


Multiplying by the mass denoted   we derive the kinematics of the system to be


 

 

To develop the kinetics of the system, we consider the two forces:

For the force limiting displacement in the y direction, we look at Hooke's law

 

For the force opposing the motion, the damping is related to the velocity of the system by

 

where   is the coefficient of viscous friction

Equating the kinematics to the kinetics we preliminarily have

 

and simplifying with:

 

 


Final Equation:

 




Author: Nyal Jennings
Last Edit: 01/28/2012 - 11:01 PM
Reviewed By: Martin Dolgiej

R1.2

edit
Example alt text
Figure 1

From Figure 1 -
Spring:

 

 



Mass:

 

 



Damp:

 

 



Forcing Funtion:

 

 



Balancing the forces in the y direction:

 



Substituting equations (1),(2),(3), and (4):

 


 





Author: Martin Dolgiej
Last Edit: 01/28/2012 - 11:32 PM
Reviewed By: Matt Hilsenrath

R1.3

edit

FBD of Spring


 


 


FBD of Dashpot


 


 


FBD of Mass


 


(Newton's 2nd Law)


 


 


 


 




Author: Ryan McDaniel
Reviewed by: Erin Standish

R1.4

edit

Given:

 

 



Solution:
Deriving equation (3):

Taking the derivative of (Eq. 2) gives:

 

 




By definition:
 

 

 

Plugging theses definitions into (Eq. A):

 

 




Deriving equation (4):
By definition:

 

 

 

Using Q and its time derivatives, (2) can be written as

 

 




Authors: Erin Standish, James Welch
Reviewed by: Brandon Wright Ryan McDaniel

R1.5

edit

For question 1.5a we have to find the general solution to the equation:

 


(1)

and we have the relation

 


(2)

Its first two derivatives are

 


(3)

and

 


(4)

Incorporating (2), (3), and (4) into equation (1), it can be shown that

 



Factoring out the exponential term,

 



We recognize that an exponential term cannot equal zero, so it can be divided out. Now we are left with the characteristic equation

 



Recognizing the relation, (7) can be factored to

 



to reveal the roots of the characteristic equation to be

 



and

 



so the standard form of the equation can be written

 









For question 1.5b we have to find the general solution to the equation:


 



and we have the relation

 



its first two derivatives are

 



and

 



Incorporating these equations it can be shown that

 



Dividing out,

 



we have

 



and since

 



can't equal 0, we must evaluate the roots of the equation.

 



Factoring we have,

 



Which places a double root at

 



So to describe the system in standard form,

 





Author: Brandon Wright
Reviewed by: Matt Hilsenrath

R1.6

edit

Part A:

edit
Example alt text
Figure 1

Order: Second Order ODE

Linearity: Linear

Superposition:

 

From Figure 1 -

 

Splitting differential equation into particular and homogeneous:

 

 

Summing above equations together:

 

 




Therefore superposition IS valid.

Part B:

edit
Example alt text
Figure 2

Order: First Order ODE

Linearity: Non-linear

Superposition:

 

From Figure 2 -

 

Splitting differential equation into particular and homogeneous:

 

 

Summing above equations together:

 

 




Therefore, superposition is NOT valid.

Part C:

edit
Example alt text
Figure 3

Order: First Order ODE

Linearity: Non-linear

Superposition:

 

From Figure 3 -

 

Splitting differential equation into particular and homogeneous:

 

 

Summing above equations together:

 

 




Therefore superposition is NOT valid.

Part D:

edit
Example alt text
Figure 4

Order: Second Order ODE

Linearity: Linear

Superposition:

 

From Figure 4 -

 

Splitting differential equation into particular and homogeneous:

 

 

Summing above equations together:

 

 




Therefore superposition IS valid.

Part E:

edit
Example alt text
Figure 5

Order: Second Order ODE

Linearity: Linear

Superposition:

 

From Figure 5 -

 

Splitting differential equation into particular and homogeneous:

 

 

Summing above equations together:

 

 




Therefore superposition IS valid.

Part F:

edit
Example alt text
Figure 6

Order: Second Order ODE

Linearity: Linear

Superposition:

 

From Figure 6 -

 

Splitting differential equation into particular and homogeneous:

 

 

Summing above equations together:

 

 




Therefore superposition IS valid.

Part G:

edit
Example alt text
Figure 7

Order: iv Order ODE

Linearity: Non-linear

Superposition:

 

From Figure 7 -

 

Splitting differential equation into particular and homogeneous:

 

 

Summing above equations together:

 

 




Therefore superposition is NOT valid.

Part H:

edit
Example alt text
Figure 8

Order: Second Order ODE

Linearity: Non-linear

Superposition:

 

From Figure 8 -

 

Splitting differential equation into particular and homogeneous:

 

 

Summing above equations together:

 

 




Therefore superposition is NOT valid.





Author: Martin Dolgiej
Last Edited: 01/28/2011 - 4:10 PM
Reviewed by:James Welch, Matt Hilsenrath

Contributing Members

edit
Team Contribution Table
Problem
||
Solved/Typed By
||
Proofread By
R1.1 in Sec 1 p. 1-5 Andrew Martin
R1.2 in Sec 1 p. 1-4 Martin Matt
R1.3 in Sec 1 p. 1-5 Ryan Erin
R1.4 in Sec 2 p. 2-2 Erin, James Brandon, Ryan
R1.5 in Sec 2 p. 2-5 Brandon Matt
R1.6 in Sec 2 p. 2-7 Martin James, Matt