Wikinews:Flagged revisions/Requests for permissions/Removal/Gopher65: Difference between revisions
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
====Votes==== |
====Votes==== |
||
{{support}} - Inactive and said they are fine with it more than a year ago. Hope they will become active again and reapply.[[User:Me Da Wikipedian|Me Da Wikipedian]] ([[User talk:Me Da Wikipedian|talk]]) 21:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC) |
{{support}} - Inactive and said they are fine with it more than a year ago. Hope they will become active again and reapply.[[User:Me Da Wikipedian|Me Da Wikipedian]] ([[User talk:Me Da Wikipedian|talk]]) 21:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
{{support}} uncontroversial. —[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 22:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:33, 31 May 2024
Gopher65 (talk · contribs – Edit rights)
The user okay'ed with being de-sysopped. I notified the reviewer twice last year about having not reviewed articles for more than two years. Someone requested a review on a now-deleted article, but Gopher65 didn't reply or do anything else regarding that. I know enforcing WN:PEP is challenging or irritating to others, especially when the project has a very small community. However, another user's reviewer tools were taken away recently, implying that PEP should apply, even when reluctant to do so. --George Ho (talk) 21:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Stats
- Links for Gopher65: Gopher65 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · review log · lu)
Questions and comments
Votes
Support - Inactive and said they are fine with it more than a year ago. Hope they will become active again and reapply.Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Support uncontroversial. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)