Template:Did you know nominations/House Bill 5414: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
review |
comment |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
|sign = [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 01:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC) |
|sign = [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 01:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
}} |
}} |
||
: Sorry we missed this, {{u|Daniel Case}}! In the future, feel free to light a fire under someone's tuchus at [[WT:DYK]] if it hasn't been reviewed/promoted with less than a week to go. [[user:theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[user talk:theleekycauldron|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Theleekycauldron|contribs]]) (she/[[singular they|they]]) 12:30, 8 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 12:30, 8 July 2022
DYK toolbox |
---|
House Bill 5414
- ... that under Connecticut's recently passed House Bill 5414, abortion providers in the state can countersue anyone who sues them under the Texas Heartbeat Act? Source: "H.B. 5414 counters bans like S.B. 8 by creating a new cause of action: Anyone sued for providing reproductive services in Connecticut could turn around and file a countersuit", Slate; April 20, 2022. "Effective date July 1, 2022", House Bill 5414
- ALT1: ... that under House Bill 5414 the governor of Connecticut may not extradite anyone accused of breaking another state's abortion laws for actions legal in Connecticut? Source: "Then there is the nonextradition clause, a necessary but chilling analog to free-state efforts to shelter fugitive slaves before the Civil War. This provision bars the governor from extraditing an individual to another state for performing or abetting reproductive health services that are lawful in Connecticut." Slate
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Clements twins
- Comment:
I would really like this to run on July 1, the date the law goes into effectWell so much for that! Daniel Case (talk) 19:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self-nominated at 04:52, 21 June 2022 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: This is ready, and the promoter can choose the hook. It's too bad that longer articles at DYK typically take a while to get reviewed. SL93 (talk) 01:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry we missed this, Daniel Case! In the future, feel free to light a fire under someone's tuchus at WT:DYK if it hasn't been reviewed/promoted with less than a week to go. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 12:30, 8 July 2022 (UTC)