User talk:TylerBurden: Difference between revisions

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

You closed edit part roald dahl topic.you should take me a unprotection form.i will request for a edit.the wikipedia example form isnt working.pls take a another one. Trex3212 (talk) 15:57, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should stop trying to evade your block, @Ert141. TylerBurden (talk) 17:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TylerBurden, just out of curiosity why did you remove Northern Europe from the category "Regions of Europe"? Ingwina (talk) 06:57, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ingwina Hey Ingwina. I removed it because the article is already part of the "Northern Europe" category, which itself is a subcategory of "Regions of Europe". So it is my understanding that when two categories are connected like that, WP:CATSPECIFIC says the more specific category should be used. Hope that clears it up. TylerBurden (talk) 07:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah nice makes sense. Thanks for all your great work! Ingwina (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ingwina Same to you. TylerBurden (talk) 21:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I thought first that they are needed in those cases as well. But then, see Talk:Americans#RfC about the hatnote. Privybst (talk) 08:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

Administrator changes ScottishFinnishRadish Staxringold Ahoerstemeier (deceased) • Ched

Interface administrator changes Cyberpower678 CheckUser changes GorillaWarfare

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, consensus was found that if the rationale for a block depends on information that is not available to all administrators, that information should be sent to the Arbitration Committee, a checkuser or an oversighter for action (as applicable, per ArbCom's recent updated guidance) instead of the administrator making the block.
• Following an RfC, consensus has been found that, in the context of politics and science, the reliability of FoxNews.com is unclear and that additional considerations apply to its use.
• Community comment on the revised Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines is requested until 8 October.

Technical news

• The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

Arbitration

• Remedy 8.1 of the Muhammad images case will be rescinded 1 November following a motion.
• A modification to the deletion RfC remedy in the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been made to reaffirm the independence of the RfC and allow the moderators to split the RfC in two.
• The second phase of the 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review closes 3 October.

Miscellaneous

• An administrator's account was recently compromised. Administrators are encouraged to check that their passwords are secure, and reminded that ArbCom reserves the right to not restore adminship in cases of poor account security. You can also use two-factor authentication (2FA) to provide an extra level of security.
• Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections open 2 October and close 8 October.
• You are invited to comment on candidates in the 2022 CUOS appointments process.
• An RfC is open to discuss whether to make Vector 2022 the default skin on desktop.
• Tech tip: You can do a fuzzy search of all deleted page titles at Special:Undelete.

An article you recently created, Spiderr, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why you did this. Please respond on the article's talk page. If you mean that anyone is a Swedish American with only third, fourth or more generation Swedish ancestry, or anyone with a Swedish surname is, or anyone who grew up in an American community dominated by Swedish immigrants is, or only people who descend from pre-1916 immigrants are (all of them ?!), we're going to have problems with that POV of yours. If you can gain consensus on that talk page that an American with no more that one Swedish grandparent is a Swedish American, I'll give up. Seems flabbergasting to me. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]