Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Valerius Tygart: Difference between revisions
→CheckUser requests: endorse |
CU results |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> CheckUser requests </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> CheckUser requests </span>====== |
||
{{RFCU| D | F | |
{{RFCU| D | F | }} <small>Requested by [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 08:43, 13 November 2009 (UTC) </small> |
||
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> |
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> |
||
<!--## Codeletters are: |
<!--## Codeletters are: |
||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== |
||
{{user|1=SlateGrey}}, {{user|1=HamStation}}, {{user|1=ParkerDrive}}, {{user|1=JohnKillbuckSr}}, and {{user|1=Mwithers}} are {{staleIP}}. |
|||
{{checkuser|Valerius Tygart}} is {{confirmed}} as being related to {{checkuser|DyadTriad}} and {{checkuser|Dogwood123}}. 140... and 96... are him. The others, I'm not sure. [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="green">J'''.'''delanoy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<font color="blue"><sub>adds</sub></font>]] 18:11, 18 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Conclusions </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Conclusions </span>====== |
Revision as of 18:11, 18 November 2009
Valerius Tygart
- Valerius Tygart (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: confirmed
Report date November 13 2009, 08:43 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- Dogwood123 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) Self-confirmed
- DyadTriad (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) Self-confirmed
- SlateGrey (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) Self-confirmed
- HamStation (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ParkerDrive (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- JohnKillbuckSr (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Mwithers (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
- Self-confirmed
Evidence submitted by Xenophrenic
The user page User:Valerius Tygart has an impressive list of articles created or edited by this editor. All accounts listed above that are marked "Self-confirmed" have confirmed themselves as puppet accounts of this editor by logging their editing efforts on this main user page. The edit history of this page reads like a who's who list of many of the accounts this editor uses to edit Wikipedia. The few remaining accounts listed above that are not marked "Self-confirmed" were added because they pick up the same talk-page conversations and edits where the confirmed socks leave off; they are in the same IP range, on the very same span of articles and use the identical edit summary notations. Many of these accounts are dynamic and/or have gone stale, but have been included for record-keeping and pattern establishment because they 100% pass the duck test. The list is from a brief first-pass review and is nowhere near all inclusive.
All of the above accounts can be confirmed as socks through either checkuser or behavior analysis, but is the puppetry abusive? At first glance, the following examples stand out:
- Socking to evade a block: User:96.231.137.242 gets blocked for 31 hours for edit-warring on the Bill Maher article. Just 3 hours later, he shows up as DyadTriad on the article talk page, and continues the argument.
- Socking to influence concensus: During controversial discussion on Biocentrism, the puppetmaster proposes a content split Talk:Biocentrism#Split_proposal, and then User:96.231.137.242, User:Valerius Tygart and User:Dogwood123 (all the same person) comment on the proposal.
- Socking to circumvent WP:3RR: During a heated edit war on the Robert Lanza article, between July 26 & 27, 2009, at least 9 reverts were made by User:96.231.137.242, User:140.139.35.250 and User:67.232.95.123
- Socking to avoid scrutiny: Another editor suspects Dogwood123 of being a sock, but he denies it and makes his own accusations. Several of the sockpuppet accounts listed above have warnings and admonishments on their talk pages, but with the edit history spread across so many accounts, it is difficult to detect patterns of continued poor behavior.
Xenophrenic (talk) 08:43, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Comment: I'd like to second this checkuser request. I was the admin who had blocked 96.231.137.242 (talk · contribs) for edit-warring at Bill Maher and found the subsequent appearance of User:DyadTriad to be suspicious (though not conclusive, by itself). The fact that the main account Valerius Tygart (talk · contribs) too recently edited the article and all the evidence compiled above makes socking even more likely. Note that though the IPs listed above geolocate to different US states and some to Turkey, that does not rule out socking in this case, if one looks at the User:Valerius Tygart's editing history and article interest. Abecedare (talk) 16:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
CheckUser requests
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: D + F (3RR using socks and another reason)
- Current status –
Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Requested by Xenophrenic (talk) 08:43, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Checkuser required to determine extent of apparent sock-farm and to verify the abusive uses of socks outlined above.
Clerk endorsed per Abcedare. Despite the fact that none of these accounts are blocked, it would be nice to find which accounts he has used that aren't listed above as self-confirmed to compare editing histories. NW (Talk) 21:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
SlateGrey (talk · contribs), HamStation (talk · contribs), ParkerDrive (talk · contribs), JohnKillbuckSr (talk · contribs), and Mwithers (talk · contribs) are Stale.
Valerius Tygart (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is Confirmed as being related to DyadTriad (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and Dogwood123 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). 140... and 96... are him. The others, I'm not sure. J.delanoygabsadds 18:11, 18 November 2009 (UTC)