Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zealking: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##--> |
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##--> |
||
{{endorse}} Self endorsed for CU to see if this is still a case of tor nodes not being blocked or if perhaps we now have a possible rangeblock, etc. --[[User:Shirik|<span style="color:#005">Sh</span><span style="color:#007">i</span><span style="color:#009">r</span><span style="color:#00A">ik</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Shirik|<span style="color:#88C">Questions or Comments?</span>]])</small> 16:11, 26 April 2010 (UTC) |
{{endorse}} Self endorsed for CU to see if this is still a case of tor nodes not being blocked or if perhaps we now have a possible rangeblock, etc. --[[User:Shirik|<span style="color:#005">Sh</span><span style="color:#007">i</span><span style="color:#009">r</span><span style="color:#00A">ik</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Shirik|<span style="color:#88C">Questions or Comments?</span>]])</small> 16:11, 26 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Still Tor. No range to block. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 16:33, 26 April 2010 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
Revision as of 16:33, 26 April 2010
Zealking
- Zealking (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zealking/Archive.
Report date April 26 2010, 16:11 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- TheZealwillNEVERend (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Copiousammountsofzeal (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Shirik
I hate to bring this up again, but it appears the fix to the TorBlock extension was insufficient to stop this vandal. Typical pattern is still being followed; "zeal" in the username with trivial edits including exclamation points. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 16:11, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
- Current status –
Self-endorsed by clerk for Checkuser attention. Requested by Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 16:11, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed Self endorsed for CU to see if this is still a case of tor nodes not being blocked or if perhaps we now have a possible rangeblock, etc. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 16:11, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Still Tor. No range to block. --jpgordon::==( o ) 16:33, 26 April 2010 (UTC)