Talk:Richard Wagner: Difference between revisions

== No infobox ==

{{Infobox person

| name = Richard Wagner

| image = RichardWagner.jpg

| caption = Richard Wagner, 1871

| alt = Portrait of Richard Wagner, 1871

| birth_date = {{birth date|1813|5|22|df=y}}

| birth_place = [[Leipzig]]

| death_date = {{death date and age|1883|2|23|1813|5|22|df=y}}

| death_place = [[Venice]]

| occupation =

{{hlist

| [[Composer (music)|composer]]

| [[theatre director]]

| [[Conductor (music)|conductor]]

| [[Libretto|librettist]]

| founder of the [[Bayreuth Festival]]

}}

|years active =

{{Collapsible list |title=1833–1883

| {{Timeline-event|date={{Start date|1833}}|end_date={{End date|1834}}|location=[[Würzburg]]}}

| {{Timeline-event|date={{Start date|1834}}|end_date={{End date|1836}}|location=[[Magdeburg]]}}

| {{Timeline-event|date={{Start date|1836}}|end_date={{End date|1837}}|location=[[Königsberg]]}}

| {{Timeline-event|date={{Start date|1837}}|end_date={{End date|1839}}|location=[[Riga]]}}

| {{Timeline-event|date={{Start date|1839}}|end_date={{End date|1842}}|location=[[Paris]]}}

| {{Timeline-event|date={{Start date|1842}}|end_date={{End date|1849}}|location=[[Dresden]]}}

| {{Timeline-event|date={{Start date|1849}}|end_date={{End date|1858}}|location=[[Zürich]]}}

| {{Timeline-event|date={{Start date|1858}}|end_date={{End date|1862}}|location=[[Venice]]}}

| {{Timeline-event|date={{Start date|1862}}|end_date={{End date|1864}}|location=[[Biebrich (Wiesbaden)|Biebrich]]}}

| {{Timeline-event|date={{Start date|1864}}|end_date={{End date|1865}}|location=[[Munich]]}}

| {{Timeline-event|date={{Start date|1865}}|end_date={{End date|1871}}|location=[[Lucerne]]}}

| {{Timeline-event|date={{Start date|1871}}|end_date={{End date|1882}}|location=[[Bayreuth]]}}

| {{Timeline-event|date={{Start date|1882}}|end_date={{End date|1883}}|location=[[Venice]]}}

}}

| style = [[Romantic music|Romantic]]

| notable_works =

{{Collapsible list | title=Rienzi to Parsifal

| {{Start date|1840}} ''[[Rienzi]]''

| {{Start date|1841}} ''{{lang|de|[[The Flying Dutchman (opera)|Der fliegende Holländer]]}}''

| {{Start date|1844}} ''[[Tannhäuser (opera)|Tannhäuser]]''

| {{Start date|1848}} ''[[Lohengrin (opera)|Lohengrin]]''

| {{Start date|1853}} ''{{lang|de|[[Das Rheingold]]}}''

| {{Start date|1854}} ''{{lang|de|[[Die Walküre]]}}''

| {{Start date|1856}} ''{{lang|de|[[Siegfried (opera)|Siegfried]]}}''

| {{Start date|1857}} ''{{lang|de|[[Tristan und Isolde]]}}''

| {{Start date|1862}} ''{{lang|de|[[Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg]]}}''

| {{Start date|1868}} ''{{lang|de|[[Götterdämmerung]]}}''

| {{Start date|1876}} ''[[Parsifal]]''

}}

| spouse =

{{ubl |

| [[Minna Planer]] (1836–1866)

| [[Cosima Wagner]] (1870–1883)

}}

| children =

{{hlist |

| Isolde

| Eva

| [[Siegfried Wagner|Siegfried]]

}}

| signature = Richard Wagner Signature.svg

}}

No, don't be afraid, I don't suggest to place an infobox in this article, a few days before it will be TFA, against the wish of the project and the article's main author. I only follow the advice [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ched/RfC_-_Infobox&diff=549547149&oldid=549541081 Place infoboxes on article talk instead of article where their inclusion is disputed (per NYB)], --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 19:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

:I don't see that this 'advice' has any formal validation whatever. It is just one editor's idea, and not a very good one, imo, as it will encourage some smartass to put the ugly column you have created on the main page. So merely placing this here at this time is I'm afraid Gerda uncommonly parallel to a provocative act of bad faith. Don't expect me to smile. --[[User:Smerus|Smerus]] ([[User talk:Smerus|talk]]) 19:37, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

::I heard "bad faith" before. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] who gave this advice, quoting [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]], is hardly known to be pro infobox. I think it's a reasonable advice, and I don't know what you mean by the main page. If you mean the article, I know many people who will know to revert. Now I smile, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 19:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

::: Oh, let's sing the song of "bad faith" again. As soon as somebody raises something you don't like, Smerus, it's "bad faith" - even though it's advice that comes from two other respected editors. Nobody's fooled by your mean-spirited attempt to smear Gerda and you ought to be ashamed of yourself. --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 20:38, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

:::::: What an interesting comment! I am delighted that [[User:RexxS|RexxS]] has found time to divert himself from scuba-diving to consider Wagner. I certainly realise the implications of a 'bad faith' imputation, which I considered carefully, and used here for the first time ever, I believe, on Wikipedia. By asserting, however, that I make this accusation 'as soon as somebody raises something I don't like', and further more by calling me 'mean-spirited' and a 'smear'er, [[User:RexxS|RexxS]] is adopting precisely the [[ad hominem]] arguments he purports to deplore, which perhaps puts his valuable contribution in context. Not, of course, that I am accusing him of bad faith.--[[User:Smerus|Smerus]] ([[User talk:Smerus|talk]]) 10:01, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:::::::He didn't call you 'mean-spirited', nor a 'smear'er. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 10:41, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:::::::: I cite (in case you somehow missed it, it's only a few lines above this) "Nobody's fooled by your mean-spirited attempt to smear Gerda". But is not [[User:RexxS|RexxS]] able to defend himself?--[[User:Smerus|Smerus]] ([[User talk:Smerus|talk]]) 14:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::::::::: Yes, of course I can. Let me explain: If I called ''you'' an "ill-informed Luddite with the reading comprehension of a dead sponge", ''that'' would be a personal attack and ad hominem. But I wouldn't do that because I don't know you from Adam; you might be a really nice, intelligent, well-informed guy, but I wouldn't know. What I ''do'' know is that in the very first response in this thread, you maligned a respected editor who has not an ounce of bad faith in her - instead of addressing the issue of improving this article. The comment was mean-spirited. If you are telling me that was uncharacteristic of you, then fine; let's get back to discussing this infobox. --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 16:08, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::::::::: Well I will readily admit that, if, for example, I were to allege that ''your'' comments were (shall we say) "mean spirited" and an "attempt to smear", and, without any evidence, were to claim that (say) you always responded to those who disagreed with you with accusations of bad faith, that would certainly be an ad hominem attack - I should be fascinated to learn why it does not qualify as such when you apply these terms to me. Do tell. --[[User:Smerus|Smerus]] ([[User talk:Smerus|talk]]) 13:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

:::::Smerus, that "ugly column" snark was completely out of line! Per [[MOS:INFOBOX]]: "The use of infoboxes is neither required nor prohibited for any article. Whether to include an infobox, which infobox to include, and which parts of the infobox to use, is determined through '''discussion and consensus among the editors at each individual article.'''" Simply raising the issue does not warrant such an ad hominem attack as this. Frankly, I think it's ridiculous that some variant of <nowiki>{{infobox person}}</nowiki> is NOT used in this article. And frankly, I strongly FAVOR having infoboxes in any biography, they are quite suitable. But to the point, if you oppose something, remember WP:NPA and simply state your position without attacking others. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]^{[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]} 21:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

::::::As it happens, I strongly favour the use of infoboxes, but I can see no point to this action than to try to drum up support when the article becomes FA and encourage an editor to move the box to the article space. If an issue has already been discussed it should not be disingenuously reintroduced. It's unacceptable and should be removed from here. [[User:Paul Barlow|Paul B]] ([[User talk:Paul Barlow|talk]]) 21:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

::::::And look what the freakin' thing has done to the layout of the talk page! [[User:Paul Barlow|Paul B]] ([[User talk:Paul Barlow|talk]]) 21:40, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

:::::::Believe me or not: I don't drum, I am a singer, - I fixed the layout that has to do with observation, not with a template, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 21:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

:'''Support''' the use of an infobox, like that proposed here, as useful to our readers and helpful in emitting metadata. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 23:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

*As much as I mostly love infoboxes in any other article about some composers, I am unfortunately going to '''oppose''' it per [[WP:COMPOSERS]]. Also, the use of an infobox for composers like these are mostly contrary to the strategic goals of the Wikimedia Foundation. [[User:Sjones23|Lord Sjones23]] ([[User talk:Sjones23|talk]] - [[User:Sjones23/Wikipedia contributions|contributions]]) 00:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:: As you're obviously fond of ALLCAPLINKS, I'm going to suggest you read [[WP:LOCALCON]] which says: {{tq|"Consensus among a limited group of editors, at one place and time, cannot override community consensus on a wider scale. For instance, unless they can convince the broader community that such action is right, participants in a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] cannot decide that some generally accepted [[WP:POLICY|policy or guideline]] does not apply to articles within its scope."}} (and LOCALCON is a '''policy''', btw). The community consensus is documented at [[MOS:INFOBOX]] (yes, it's part of the Manual of Style):

:: {{tq|"An infobox template is an infobox that uses the template software feature. They are a broad class of templates commonly used in articles to present certain summary or overview information about the subject.

:: These boxes are designed to be placed into main articles related to the topic area, usually at the top next to the lead section.

:: ...

:: The use of infoboxes is neither required nor prohibited for any article. Whether to include an infobox, which infobox to include, and which parts of the infobox to use, is determined through discussion and consensus among the editors at each individual article.}}

:: So, I'm going to suggest that you think again about trying to import a local consensus from a project to usurp a decision that properly belongs to a discussion on this very page. Your argument violates the consensus in both the applicable policy (WP:CON) and guideline (MOS), so you're going to need some pretty strong reasons to defend it.

:: Please feel free to supply the reference to where the use of infoboxes anywhere is "contrary to the strategic goals" of the WMF. And if you suggest it puts off new editors, I'm going to mock you for unsubstantiated speculation and ask where you got that made-up piece of misinformation from? --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 01:47, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:::Actually, I read [[WP:LOCALCON]] and I understand where you're coming from. So far, the infobox topic has been divided here. If there is a [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] to include an infobox, it may stay, but if there is no consensus, it may not stay. This is a controversial topic indeed. I have obviously expressed concerns about using infoboxes in the past, especially with regards to composers. My contention is that the info box should not go into the article because infoboxes can lead to edit wars between those with pro-infobox and con-infobox and various discussions involving it, as well as numerous RfCs on this matter. These issues have often lead to other issues, especially with the Georg Solti fiasco back in August, which led to Tim riley's temporary retirement and Andy Mabbett's topic ban from editing the TFAs of the day. [[User:Sjones23|Lord Sjones23]] ([[User talk:Sjones23|talk]] - [[User:Sjones23/Wikipedia contributions|contributions]]) 03:41, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Although I disagree with the way in which Smerus chose to voice his concerns, it seems they have been realized here. I apologize for suggesting the idea. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 02:08, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:I disagree with Smerus' assessment of Nikkimaria's advice to propose infoboxes on talk pages rather than adding them to articles without discussing them first. I think Gerda did the right thing. As to the infobox itself: it completely fails as a short summary of Wagner's significance – it is way too big/long. Some details: Cosima's birthname is much more interesting than her married name; some of his grandchildren and great-grandchildren are much more interesting than his children. What's with the bottom link "more details" to [[:Template:Richard Wagner]]? Lastly, on the way the coding of infoboxes has gone recently: the proliferation of specialised templates like {{Tl|Plainlist}}, {{Tl|Collapsible list}}, {{Tl|Timeline-event}} makes infoxes certainly less accessible and editable to the average editor. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 02:46, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::To be clear, my suggestion (and, from the first post here, it would appear Gerda's also) was to post the infobox on talk ''instead'' of adding it to the article, rather than ''before''. Smerus' fear appears to be that the former would become the latter. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 03:12, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::: @Michael: We need the first two templates so that lists are marked as lists. It's not just infoboxes, of course, as anyone using a screen reader will tell you. I'm sure that {{u|Graham87}} will say that he's quite comfortable with short lists with commas as separators, but as the list gets longer, marking it up properly lets him hear (if he chooses) something like "List of 8 items: First item: ... (eight items spoken) ... end of list". Some of our lists use {{tag|br|s}} to separate items and that sounds very annoying to continually hear "new line", and as a result that always needs to be changed. So although less experienced editors don't have to learn how to mark up lists to be more accessible - because others can do that for them - they need to understand that blocking efforts to improve accessibility on the encyclopedia really isn't doing a favour to our readers.

::: @Nikki: Since the purpose of this page is to discuss improvements to this article, I think Smerus has a point, however badly contextualised. I would prefer to use the infobox here to see if it can be used in the article. We can actually chop and change it here and see if we can meet everyone's wishes. Personally, I think it's too big and contains information that doesn't fit with the requirement at MOSINFOBOX: {{tq|"... keep in mind the purpose of an infobox: to summarize key facts in the article in which it appears. The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance. Of necessity, some infoboxes contain more than just a few fields; however, wherever possible, present information in short form, and exclude any unnecessary content."}} I'd be keen to work with anybody open-minded enough to explore a smaller, leaner version. If at the end, consensus says we don't use it, then so be it. It is possible though that something more palatable to everyone might emerge and be usable. --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 04:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::::I'm aware of the advantages of those templates for sight-impaired readers, although I think they may sometimes be overstated. My unqualified use of the word "accessible" was wrong; I meant "more difficult to create or edit", but reading your response, it seems to have been understood that way. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 04:50, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:::::I've been [[Wikipedia:Notifications|summoned]] here. :-) Yes, for short lists and/or short list items, commas are fine; plainlist should be used for anything else. The <nowiki><br/></nowiki> solution shouldn't be used at all. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 09:01, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

* '''Oppose''' as a visually ugly duplicate of the lead and per other reasons listed at [[WP:COMPOSERS]]. [[User:Toccata quarta|Toccata quarta]] ([[User talk:Toccata quarta|talk]]) 03:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

* '''Oppose''' as redundant, awkward, confusing, uninformative. PS: The works of the ''Ring'' cycle are normally listed together. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 04:50, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

*[[File:Giovanni Domenico Tiepolo - The Procession of the Trojan Horse in Troy - WGA22382.jpg|thumb|280px|Trojan Horse, ''left [[Talk:Richard Wagner|here]], intended for '''[[Richard Wagner|there]]''' '']]'''Oppose/delete infobox from this talk page'''. This infobox is a '''[[Trojan Horse]]'''. Until there’s consensus for it to be here on the talk page, I think it should be removed. I'm surprised this 'biobox' issue has been raised again, so soon after the '''rejected [[Talk:Johann_Sebastian_Bach#Infobox_proposal|Bach infobox proposal]]'''. ''Definitely not helpful for the project, and discouraging for new/would-be editors.'' --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 05:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

** No consensus is required for an editor to post an example such as this on a ''talk'' page. Your continued attempts to stifle debate are symptomatic of someone whose arguments have no substance. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 10:37, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

* '''Oppose''' for the formal record (assuming I'm allowed to comment whilst cowering from the denunciations of some of the above), and support Kleinzach's proposal to delete box from this page. What on earth, anyway, is the use or point of having an infobox on a talk page as a permanent feature? Not that I wish to start such a discussion here - please take the whole topic away from the Wagner talk page and article.--[[User:Smerus|Smerus]] ([[User talk:Smerus|talk]]) 05:17, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

** It's not a ''permanent'' feature; it can be archived with the rest of the discussion; ''after'' discussion has ended. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 10:38, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:::Reacting to some useful comments in the above about the CONTENT I collapsed a bit more. - As I find two boxes here too confusing I stored the other in [[User:Gerda Arendt/Sandbox|my sandbox]], if you want to compare, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 16:19, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:::: I've made it a bit smaller, Gerda. Each of the infoboxes are in the page history, but I think I detect a preference among those commenting for the infobox to be as small as we can make it. We ought to be considering whether topics like "known for" are appropriate in a top-level summary, as they can be rather subjective and potentially unlimited. I mean, how do we decide what Wagner was ''best'' know for? --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 16:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::::: I guess Bayreuth is a keyword that should appear, - lovely to speak about content ;) --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 16:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

*'''Support infobox''' if we are voting and if anyone is counting. "Nuff said here. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]^{[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]} 22:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

=== Canvassing ===

Note {{Diff|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music|555436138|555347678|this canvassing}} ({{Diff|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Composers|555437100|555402601|and this pointer to it}}); it appears that other interested projects have not (yet) been notified. The comment cited also makes accusations of disruption. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 23:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

: This is, or seems meant to carry the weight of, a serious accusation. What has happened is tha an editor has advised relevant WikiProjects of the discussion, which is perfectly appropriate. Other editors are of course free to advise other projects if they feel so moved. Unless anyone is aware of anything that has been done which does not meet the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Canvassing]], this impugnation should be withdrawn and removed from this page.--[[User:Smerus|Smerus]] ([[User talk:Smerus|talk]]) 08:29, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::A cursory read of [[Wikipedia:Canvassing]] will show that the guidelines there were breached. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 10:34, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::Yes, and you've selectively notified ''some'' of them, in a partisan manner. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 12:23, 17 May 2013 (UTC) - '''Note''' the comment dated 12:23, 17 May appears out of context, because it was in reply to an earlier comment, {{Diff|Talk:Richard_Wagner|555455720|555452368|posted at 02:42, 17 May}} by [[User:Kleinzach]], which read "''I have notified the related projects — [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Classical music|Classical music]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Composers|Composers]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Richard Wagner|Wagner]] — about this discussion. ''Please'' remember that there is a broad community of editors who have expressed their views on this subject ''many times'' in the past.''" and which he has {{Diff|Talk:Richard_Wagner|555515237|555502942|subsequently deleted}}, contrary to [[WP:REDACT|our community guidelines]]. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 23:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

{{od}}While I am concerned with calling the discussion here "disruptive" and that was wrong, all that said, the solution to selective canvassing is, I suppose, more selective canvassing eleswhere. Eventually everyone gets notified. WP:CANVASS is usually used as a stick to prevent "the people on the other side" from notifying those who might care. Let's all drop this stick. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]^{[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]} 22:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:In fact its used as a ''stick'' [sic] to stop, er, canvassing, which the community has decided by consensus is not to be done. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 23:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

===Not participating in Canvassing (above)===

I am not writing to, or participating in the section entitled 'Canvassing' (above). Unfortunately a message by me has twice been threaded into the discussion there against my wishes. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARichard_Wagner&diff=555502552&oldid=555501901] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARichard_Wagner&diff=555523972&oldid=555521346] I hope this childish behaviour will stop. --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 22:37, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

===Yawn===

Same old topic, same old player. Though perhaps it a good thing in this case as a lot of people will check the take page on the FA day and see the mudslinging that keeps happening...but I'm too jaded to think anything positive will actually happen on this front... [[User:Melodia|♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫]] ([[User talk:Melodia|talk]]) 04:17, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:Die alte Weise -

: was weckt sie mich?

::It's sad that there are some people I respect involved in this as well as the usual Melot types.--[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 00:48, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

===Misunderstanding===

Sorry, I changed this back to the original No infobox. I don't know what you are supporting or opposing or yawning about. '''Infobox on talk''' was suggested, no more, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:25, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

: This calls for a new caplink, [[WP:DISINGENUOUS]].--[[User:Smerus|Smerus]] ([[User talk:Smerus|talk]]) 08:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::''"No infobox"''? So why is the box still here? Does [[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] agree that it should be removed? --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 09:39, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:::No infobox is short for no infobox in the article. I read about the infobox on the talk page as linked above. It [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ched/RfC_-_Infobox&diff=555451978&oldid=549547149 was removed] since, but Wikipedia never forgets, never forgives ;)

:::I have a love-hate-relationship with Wagner, see:

:::* 19 January 2013 [[Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Richard Wagner/archive2|start FAC Richard Wagner]], thanks to Smerus for acting on many comments!

:::* 20 January 2013 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Gerda_Arendt/Sandbox&diff=534063220&oldid=533312483 start infobox in sandbox]

:::I will improve this infobox, but am travelling right now. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 11:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::::I don't understand. If the infobox already exists in your sandbox, why copy it here? --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 12:13, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:::::So that we can discuss it - oh look, we are. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 12:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:::::: Speaking of discussing it, I've tidied up the infobox to make it shorter. I've changed the list styles for compactness and eliminated the link to the navigational template. Perhaps we can actually discuss whether that is an improvement? --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 16:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::::::: I'm generally against collapsing sections in infoboxes;, but I could live with that. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 16:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

===Moving other people's words ===

Regrettably I've had to delete my own posting. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARichard_Wagner&diff=555515237&oldid=555502942] It was being repeatedly misplaced in the middle of the 'Canvassing' section above. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARichard_Wagner&diff=555492138&oldid=555489317] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARichard_Wagner&diff=555502552&oldid=555501901]. I was ''not'' contributing to the 'Canvassing' section and I object to my posting being used to create the impression I was in the conversation when I was not. I assume this action was in reply to [[User:Smerus|Smerus]]'s demand that the ridiculous canvassing accusation be withdrawn. It's difficult to continue writing here if these tactics are used. --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 14:25, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

: We only need to look at who has been doing the replacing....but I would not to wish to raise the profiles of certain editors, however tiresome and disruptive they may be, by calling in the Heavy Brigade........--[[User:Smerus|Smerus]] ([[User talk:Smerus|talk]]) 14:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

: I've restored it, per talk page guidelines, as it had been replied to. However, it was not moved - the redundant heading above it was deleted, also in accordance with such guidelines. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 15:20, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::I have again deleted my own posting. This was ''not'' replied to in the context in which it was placed. It was indented to form part of a thread that I was not participating in. I observe [[WP|1RR]] but this does not apply to deleting my own messages if they are abused. --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 22:18, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:::It was replied to in the context in which you posted it; as a failed attempt to justify your canvassing. You frequently and arrogantly ride roughshod over such community norms: in this case alone: canvassing, deleting replied-to comments, posting new sections out of sequence. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 23:13, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

=== An infobox is there ===

If you "google" Richard Wagner, you get an infobox, some images, then:

:'''Richard Wagner'''

:composer

:Wilhelm Richard Wagner was a German composer, theatre director, polemicist, and conductor primarily known for his operas.

:<small>Wikipedia</small>

:Born: May 22, 1813, Leipzig

:Died: February 13, 1883, Venice

:Compositions: Der Ring des Nibelungen, Parsifal, More

:Movies: Parsifal

:Spouse: Cosima Wagner (m. 1870–1883), Minna Planer (m. 1836–1866)

:Children: Siegfried Wagner, Eva von Bülow, Isolde Ludowitz von Bülow

I confess that I would prefer something different, so put a suggestion at least on the talk page, if more is not possible. Try google for Bach and Carmen ;) - Like it or not: the infobox is there, - the question is if we design one or if we take what others do, mentioning a movie "Parsifal". (At least the link goes to the Syberberg film. I didn't provide the links above, look yourself.) --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 15:33, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:This is Wikipedia, just in case you didn't notice. [[User:Toccata quarta|Toccata quarta]] ([[User talk:Toccata quarta|talk]]) 15:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::Thanks for telling me, who said "Wikipedia" above as the source for the first line. Wikipedia can't be taken as a source for the infobox for Wagner, because there is no infobox, nor will be. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 15:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:::If "there ... will be [no infobox]", then why did you initiate this discussion? [[User:Toccata quarta|Toccata quarta]] ([[User talk:Toccata quarta|talk]]) 16:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::::Our conductor says that you have to repeat something 17 times to make it sink in. Here's #2: No, don't be afraid, I don't suggest to place an infobox in this article, a few days before it will be TFA, against the wish of the project and the article's main author. I only follow the advice [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ched/RfC_-_Infobox&diff=549547149&oldid=549541081 Place infoboxes on article talk instead of article where their inclusion is disputed (per NYB)]. - I certainly didn't initiate "this" discussion, being interest in content, and (still, even after Bach) believing that an article talk should be about improving the article ;) - I thought the advice was a good idea and wanted to see what happened. I still think it's a good idea. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 20:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

[[:File:MagrittePipe.jpg|thumb|150px|left|Dies ist nicht eine Infobox.]] [[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]]: {{tq|" I certainly didn't initiate "this" discussion}}. Well, see the diff. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARichard_Wagner&diff=555408064&oldid=554965455]. {{tq|" I thought the advice was a good idea and wanted to see what happened. ."}} So this is a happening rather than a disruption! Something to do with '''[[The Treachery of Images|the treachery of images]]'''? This infobox is not an infobox, and all that stuff? ''"Er sieht, Herr Kommissar, das Ganze war halt '''eine Farce und weiter nichts'''."'' --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 06:00, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

:::::<small>non-free image changed to a link. [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i>^Talk</i>]] 11:17, 20 May 2013 (UTC)</small>

I think what Gerda means is perhaps she expected her contribution to evoke no comment, as a consequence of its self-evidently non-controversial content. Or maybe she and her supporters are simply keen on getting a lot of us to waste our time when we could be improving Wikipedia. I find myself being [[User_talk:Michael_Bednarek#Archiving_Wagner_talk|haunted by her even when I am contributing to other editor's talk pages]].--[[User:Smerus|Smerus]] ([[User talk:Smerus|talk]]) 08:39, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

:I hoped (!) that the contribution of an infobox on the talk page, with respect for those who don't want it on the article page, would cause no dispute. I didn't expect it, given the previous discussions. I still think to have an infobox on a talk page when it is not wanted on the article page is a good idea, improving Wikipedia, worth pursuing and no waste of time, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 10:05, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

::[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]]: Please remind me. Is this the ''fourth'' time you have started an infobox discursion, I mean discussion? I remember [[Talk:Robert_Stoepel#Infobox_proposal|Robert Stoepel]] (27 February), [[Talk:Peter_Planyavsky#Infobox|Peter Planyavsky]] (5 March), and [[Talk:Johann_Sebastian_Bach#Infobox_proposal|Johann Sebastian Bach]] (21 March). But perhaps there are a few more? ''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 00:55, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

:::[[User talk:Gerda Arendt#Marie Lloyd|See my talk]], - I have to sing today, we still celebrate Pentecost. - Planyavsky was "my" article, I didn't start a discussion but added an infobox, my wish to have one was not respected, see history, and even after discussions that some might call a waste of time the one we have now is not as I want it. - I started Stoepel, Bach and Händel. I had predicted that Stoepel would have an infobox by 2020. He has one now, not by me. - I didn't start a discussion here, I just tried to make an infobox available for those readers who will miss it on Wednesday, because it's the normal thing to have. You know reactions to the "discussion" that followed (more appeared on my talk). I predict that Wagner will have an infobox by 2020. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 05:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

::::And I predict it won't have an infobox in 2021. [[User:Toccata quarta|Toccata quarta]] ([[User talk:Toccata quarta|talk]]) 07:31, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

:::::What do you mean by "it", Richard Wagner? --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:33, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

::::::The same thing you meant when you wrote "I predict that Wagner will have an infobox by 2020." [[User:Toccata quarta|Toccata quarta]] ([[User talk:Toccata quarta|talk]]) 09:46, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

::::::::Obviously not, I said Wagner, that would be "he". I respect a person, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 11:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

:::::::::People don't have infoboxes. Articles do. Jeez. Try respecting the language. [[User:Paul Barlow|Paul B]] ([[User talk:Paul Barlow|talk]]) 11:40, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

::::::::::Try also respecting the fact that someone has English as their fourth language, or is less careful when editing talk pages than articles. "I respect a person"—that's commendable. But what does it have to do with infoboxes in the next decade? [[User:Toccata quarta|Toccata quarta]] ([[User talk:Toccata quarta|talk]]) 12:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)