User talk:Courcelles: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:39, 13 July 2013

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110
111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120
121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130
131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140
141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150
151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

Article recreation request

Hi, I have a request: Three years ago, you deleted an article for Reach Records. I've been working on a new version of a Reach Records article that is actually sourced, but when I tried to move it to mainspace, I found that Reach Records is under creation protection. Are you able to undo that protection? Could you also review the new version to make sure it is notable enough to avoid deletion again? Thanks, --¿3family6 _contribs 01:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't G4 your draft, though I am rather unsure about how truly independent some of your sources are. (Music is not my field) I've unsalted the page, and you should have no problems moving it over, but I won't make any predictions about a third AFD. Courcelles 02:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. I might try to dig up some more coverage before moving to mainspace.--¿3family6 _contribs 02:16, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

Op-ed: It's time to stop pretending the English-language Wikinews is a viable project

WikiProject report: Not Jimbo: WikiProject Wales

Traffic report: Inflated view counts here, there, and everywhere

News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation Board appoints world expert in women's issues, global south

Dispatches: Infoboxes: time for a fresh look?

Featured content: The week of the birds

Discussion report: Featured article process governance, signature templates, and more

Wikidata weekly summary #66

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Discussions
- A request for comment on defining administrator activity
- A request for comment on image properties
Other Noteworthy Stuff
- A personal note and secret from Denny Vrandečić (WMDE)
- Denny's map gets an upgrade, take a look at the amazing visualisations!
- Browser search plugins for wikidata have beeen created.
- Byrial's database reports have been updated from the 2013-07-10 dump! These can be seen here.
Development
- Support for badges in the process of being added to the DataModel.
- Created further UI mockups for Wikidata Mobile.
- Front end performance improvements in a few areas (including multiple edits on pages).
- The bug in wbeditentity where aliases were removed has been fixed.
Did you know?
- Newest properties: eMedicine (P673), a list of (P674), Google Books identifier (P675), lyrics by (P676), ÚSOP code (P677), incertae sedis (P678), ZVG number (P679), molecular function (P680), cell component (P681), biological process (P682), ChEBI ID (P683), ortholog (P684), NCBI Taxonomy ID (P685), Gene Ontology ID (P686)
Open Tasks for You
- Update, expand and translate one of the help pages to make it easier for newcomers
- Update and expand Wikidata:Contribute to provide more information for newcomers
- Help fix formatting and value issues for a property
- Hack on one of these

Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 14:41, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Arbcom Infoboxes

I see you have asked for "a list of the "actual" parties". I've provided a list of music-related infobox discussions at Arbcom, from which names can be extracted, but about half the action has probably been on non-musical pages. If the case is going to proceed — and I'm not at all sure it will achieve anything — then I think a number of WikiProjects should be informed including Architecture, Visual arts. Regards. --Klein zach 02:39, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 </div>
 <!-- EdwardsBot 0523 -->
+== Arbcom Infoboxes ==
+I see you have asked for "a list of the "actual" parties". I've provided a list of ''music''-related infobox discussions at Arbcom, from which names can be extracted, but about half the action has probably been on non-musical pages. If the case is going to proceed — and I'm not at all sure it will achieve anything — then I think a number of WikiProjects should be informed including [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture|Architecture]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Visual arts|Visual arts]]. Regards. --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 02:39, 13 July 2013 (UTC)