User talk:Mathsci: Difference between revisions
m ←Blanked the page |
→Arbitration clarification request closed: new section |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Arbitration clarification request closed == |
|||
This is a message to inform you that a request for clarification has now been closed and following motion has been passed. The Arbitration Committee resolves by {{oldid2|573282423|Motion: Mathsci interaction bans (Race and intelligence)|motion}} that |
|||
{{quotation|1=In May 2012 (during the ''Race and intelligence review''), the committee prohibited {{user|SightWatcher}} from "participating in any discussion concerning the conduct of editors who have worked in the topic" – and therefore from discussing Mathsci's conduct. In [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&diff=519185894&oldid=519182880 October 2012], {{user|The Devil's Advocate}} and {{user|Cla68}} were banned (by an administrator acting under discretionary sanctions) from interacting with Mathsci. In [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=526591265#Result_concerning_Cla68 December 2012], Mathsci was prohibited (again under discretionary sanctions) by an arbitration enforcement administrator from requesting enforcement of these interaction bans without prior permission. The Arbitration Committee has decided to change these from one-way to two-way interaction bans. Accordingly, {{user|Mathsci}} is indefinitely prohibited from: |
|||
*[[WP:IBAN|Commenting on, or interacting with]], {{user|The Devil's Advocate}} |
|||
*[[WP:IBAN|Commenting on, or interacting with]], {{user|Cla68}} |
|||
*Participating in any discussion concerning the conduct of {{user|SightWatcher}}. |
|||
This motion should be enforced under the enforcement clauses of the ''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence|Race and intelligence]]'' final decision.}} |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, '''[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]''' ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 09:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:14, 17 September 2013
Arbitration clarification request closed
This is a message to inform you that a request for clarification has now been closed and following motion has been passed. The Arbitration Committee resolves by motion that
In May 2012 (during the Race and intelligence review), the committee prohibited SightWatcher (talk · contribs) from "participating in any discussion concerning the conduct of editors who have worked in the topic" – and therefore from discussing Mathsci's conduct. In October 2012, The Devil's Advocate (talk · contribs) and Cla68 (talk · contribs) were banned (by an administrator acting under discretionary sanctions) from interacting with Mathsci. In December 2012, Mathsci was prohibited (again under discretionary sanctions) by an arbitration enforcement administrator from requesting enforcement of these interaction bans without prior permission. The Arbitration Committee has decided to change these from one-way to two-way interaction bans. Accordingly, Mathsci (talk · contribs) is indefinitely prohibited from:
- Commenting on, or interacting with, The Devil's Advocate (talk · contribs)
- Commenting on, or interacting with, Cla68 (talk · contribs)
- Participating in any discussion concerning the conduct of SightWatcher (talk · contribs).
This motion should be enforced under the enforcement clauses of the Race and intelligence final decision.
For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC)