User talk:Lgcsmasamiya: Difference between revisions

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hello I am user ""Ashx89"", could you answer why my article was deleted Maxim Slipchenko? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashx89 (talk • contribs) 08:59, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lgcsmasamiya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RadioFan (talk) 20:25, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If an article has no references, just add {{unreferenced}}. Please don't clutter up the article by also adding irrelevant tags {{refimprove}} and {{morefootnotes}} as you did here. Thanks. PamD 12:50, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please take care not to add {{stub}} to an article like Guanabara (Joinville) which already has a specific stub tag - it just wastes other editors' time. Also please note that stub tags should be added after everything except inter-language links - you added this one after the link to the Portuguese wikipedia. It is easier for everyone if tags etc are in predictable places. The existing {{brazil-geo-stub}} wasn't in the exactly right place, as it was before the category - and I've found a better stub for it anyway now. Welcome to Wikipedia and Happy Editing. PamD 14:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 in Honduras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lempira (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for curating my recent page Kojo Tovalou Houénou, but you tagged it as unreferenced which is an error. If you'll read the page, you'll see that although it uses sfn format rather than ref format (which makes it easier to have page numbers for each claim), it is very sourced. I'd appreciate removing the tag, because that would make my heart happy. Thanks for the hard work! AbstractIllusions (talk) 20:56, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you reviewed 2013 Toronto FC season as appropriate for inclusion. However, the article appears to have no references at all and as such must be tagged. For more information on patrolling new pages please see WP:NPP, and if you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:42, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I noticed the same with several other articles, including Erle Elsworth Clippinger. New page patrolling is our first defense against the addition of inappropriate articles that are added to the encyclopedia. As such, please make sure to accurately review the new articles, add appropriate maintenance tags, and cleanup any blatant issues during the process. If you have questions or need help, please feel free to contact me anytime. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 05:51, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Just One More Kiss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bass and Yutaka Higuchi

Aku no Hana (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Yutaka Higuchi

Dress (Buck Tick song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Yutaka Higuchi

Jupiter (Buck Tick song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Yutaka Higuchi

List of number-one singles in 1990 (Japan) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Princess Princess

M・A・D (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Yutaka Higuchi

Speed (Buck Tick song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Yutaka Higuchi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lgcsmasamiya. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Scientific Constant, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not "about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content" so does not qualift for WP:CSD#A7. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 17:47, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Lgcsmasamiya, thanks for creating Norio Ishizawa!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please provide additional reliable sources that establish notability per WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Hello, Lgcsmasamiya. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Shinichi Takeda, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:28, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Mydreamsparrow. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Miss Panamá 2013, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Mydreamsparrow —Preceding undated comment added 06:37, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Nemesis63. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Cheer Perfection (TV series), and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Nemesis63

Hi, I'm Nemesis63. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Duncolm, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Nemesis63

Thanks for reviewing 1979 IL-14 Crash, Lgcsmasamiya.

Unfortunately Randykitty has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Article has several obvious problems.

To reply, leave a comment on Randykitty's talk page.

Why would you mark an article like this as reviewed? It has many obvious problems, varying from crappy English, to being completely unreferenced, having no categories, etc. I have marked it as unreviewed, so that someone who knows about plane crashes can have a look at it. --Randykitty (talk) 15:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Mabalu. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Chef Brown Sauce, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Mabalu

The article Alice in Wonder Underground has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non reliably sourced EP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FrankDev (talk) 02:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Kirananils. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Fred Johnston (writer), and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Kirananils

Hi, I'm Mkdw. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Yoshimi!, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Mkdw

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pennsylvania's 14th congressional district special election, 1839, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William W. Potter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 2013 West Midlands Cup, and have un-reviewed it again.

I though it would be best to wait until there are at least a couple of references and some text to provide context. As it is now, it's little more than a list of countries with some flags icons. - MrX 20:53, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Kristijh. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Earthquakes in 2013, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Kristijh

You tagged this article as unreferenced - even though it has a source. I have adjusted accordingly. Regards, GiantSnowman 10:23, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Phil Lester, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, MrX

Hi Lgcsmasamiya

I have noticed that you have marked several articles as reviewed even though many of those articles still have serious problems, and some should be deleted altogether. It's best to leave a page unreviewed unless you are sure that it meets Wikipedia's inclusion standards and is properly referenced. Please review WP:NPPLOG to better understand when it is appropriate to mark a page as reviewed. Many thanks. - MrX 15:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Tim Alek Mulley, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, MrX

Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Praying for the Beast, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, MrX

Hey,

 I got your message. No problem at all. Was there any particular problem? Thanks! Sosthenes12 (talk) 21:04, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Sosthenes12[reply]

Hi, I'm FunnyPika. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Tonight at 10 o'Clock, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thanks, FunnyPika —Preceding undated comment added 19:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm TheOriginalSoni. Lgcsmasamiya, thanks for creating Heaven (Buck-Tick song)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Why is this song famous so it should recieve a single article, and not be merged into the band article?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Just a quick point, when you maked the David Kada page as patrolled you missed the fact it was an unreferenced BLP and you should have BLPPROD'ed it. LGA ^{(was LightGreenApple)} _{talk to me} 00:12, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing The Aviator Casino, Lgcsmasamiya.

Unfortunately MrX has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

You might want to brush up on the guidelines for page patrolling. This page should not have been marked as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on MrX's talk page.

Hello and thanks for creating this article. It has been tagged for notability, as not meeting WP:NSONGS. Could you look it over and see if you can help improve it? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday, I got the following e-mail notification:

• The Wikipedia page Chris Corne has been changed on 9 March 2013 by Lgcsmasamiya, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Corne for the current revision.

However, I couldn't localize any change attributable to you in the revision history. Could you look into the matter? Many thanks. Best, Eklir (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lgcsmasamiya. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mauricio Villeda, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Mauricio Villeda to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, v/r - TP 17:45, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody asked you if you thought my page was appropriate or necessary. Also I would like to know the reasons you find it unappropriated. Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_times_someone_missed_the_joke_on_the_Internet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christhebagbyo (talk • contribs) 23:54, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trynna start something brah? Lay the fuck off http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_times_someone_missed_the_joke_on_the_Internet .

Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fights_you_lost_lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christhebagbyo (talk • contribs) 00:05, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing Koi Diamond, Lgcsmasamiya.

Unfortunately Dewritech has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Copyright infringement: http://www.koidiamond.com/

To reply, leave a comment on Dewritech's talk page.

Hi Lgcsmasamiya.You reviewed a page this one.It has no references at all.Is there any particular reason.---zeeyanwiki ^discutez 17:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for reviewing articles on Wikipedia. Your back-stage contributions are important for this project. Happy editing! ComputerJA (talk) 18:27, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for curating this article, but you tagged it as unreferenced which is not correct. If you'll read the page, you will see that there are references, although they are generated by some templates, and thus your tool may not have seen them. If you eyeball the article you will see them there. Thanks --Arg342 (talk) 10:52, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm AnthonyIreland. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Kuantan FA, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. AnthonyIreland (talk) 12:51, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You reviewed this page and appeared to be satisfied with it. It is recreated material identical to a prior CSD and fails WP:GNG. I was wondering if you might be working too quickly? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing Avens music, Lgcsmasamiya.

Unfortunately Timtrent has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

I left a message on your talk page already. This article is speedy deletion material - fails WP:GNG

To reply, leave a comment on Timtrent's talk page.

Hi there! Thank you for the recent contribution! "Wisdom in Book of Revelation" is going to be deleted. Please help keep this article! Comment is to be added here at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisdom in Book of Revelation . VincentLeon (talk) 07:10, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was informed that you reviewed my page and tagged it for deletion. The information contained on the page is true and correct and verifiable through the USPTO. May I asked why you marked it for deletion and what can be done to have it posted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simbadancer (talk • contribs) 07:27, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing Unkl347, Lgcsmasamiya.

Unfortunately Mkdw has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

No assertion of notability. Please review WP:CORP before marking company pages as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Mkdw's talk page.

I came to this page after seeing that you had marked as reviewed an article which most people would have flagged at once as Speedy Delete. I noticed the welter of "I have marked an article you marked as reviewed as unreviewed" comments, and it appears that you are not engaging with people over this. I am asking you now to stop reviewing articles until you understand with precision what the status of 'reviewed' means. At present I see good intentions but an imperfect understanding of the process. I am sure you have the right intentions and just need to take a step back and learn how to work better. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Timtrent. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Troy High School (New York) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! You are misusing your power in Curation and are tagging articles as unreferenced when they contain references. Yu have done this type of thing sufficiently often for me to view it as vandalism Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2012–13 Football Superleague of Kosovo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. again you have marked an article with references as unreferenced. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:43, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alexandru Ionescu (socialist militant), you may be blocked from editing. Yet another article that you have flagged as unreferenced. This must stop. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kostas Giotas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yet again you have tagged an article as being without references. You are causing work for others. This behaviour must cease. This is the final warning for vandalism. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK

I i'm trying to do my best reviewing, pleasae be patient, i'm learning here --Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 18:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Page curation reviewer rights regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lgcmasamiya, you seem to be unwilling to discuss your edits, even when you've made obvious mistakes, as when you added the 'unreferenced' tag to the Alexandru Ionescu article which had many references. Several people have complained here on your talk page, but you have never responded. An administrator has proposed in the WP:ANI discussion that you should be blocked in order to get your attention. You can avoid this if you are willing to reply at ANI. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:39, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Response

I'm new here and i'm trying to do my best reviewing new articles, i do'nt understand why i will be blocked by "Vanndalism".

You should stop curating new pages until you have more experience on Wikipedia. At present you aren't doing it right. See the complaint at WP:ANI mentioned above. Please sign your posts on talk pages like this one. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I have blocked you from editing for a period of 24 hours. Your enthusiasm for page curation is admirable, but you are making too many errors and creating too much work for other people to do in cleaning them up. You have been informed of many errors here on this talk page, and you have been asked to stop reviewing new pages - but you have failed to stop. You must heed the community's request and stop reviewing new pages - at least temporarily until you have learned enough to do it with far fewer errors. If you agree to stop reviewing new pages, you can be unblocked right away. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:36, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please, when the block expires, or you show that you understand and ask for it to be lifted, please work with an experienced editor to learn what is good practice and what is not. Among your bad choices of edits there are some excellent choices, wholly excellent choices. I would like to see you stay and grow as a wikipedia editor. It upsets me that you are not engaging in conversations with people, all of whom want to help you. We absolutely value enthusiasm like yours. Please accept help. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:10, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is to welcome you back from your short period of being blocked. I'm glad you're back. Please enjoy using WIkipedia and editing here. As you do, please use great care when choosing to tag an article. No-one wanted to block you. The discussion at AN/I shows that. But people felt there was no alternative. Please don't trip and fall. We want you here, working with enthusiasm, and working well. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really pleased to see that you have taken on board the strong advice to wait until you have more experience before reviewing and curating articles. Thank you. A number of experienced editors are available to help and mentor you. I know you are learning and trying to learn. They are happy to help and enjoy helping editors who want to learn. Would you like an introduction to one or more of them? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 08:11, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Paul Pholeros, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. ♦ Tentinator ♦ 21:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing O Singapore!: Stories in Celebration, Lgcsmasamiya.

Unfortunately Randykitty has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Totally unsourced (Infopedia is a wiki and not a reliable source).

To reply, leave a comment on Randykitty's talk page.

Thanks for reviewing They Do Return...But Gently Lead Them Back, Lgcsmasamiya.

Unfortunately Randykitty has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unsourced (Infopedia is a wiki...)

To reply, leave a comment on Randykitty's talk page.

First I am concerned about the messages regarding your reviewing articles. There are several examples where it shows you reviewed the article today. You have been asked to give it up and blocked briefly to try to get your attention. I hope you realise that you do not yet have the competence to review articles. The major errors you are making are evidence of that.

Second I am concerned that you have a welter of edits with no edit summary.. This is against custom and practice. Other editors need to know what we are doing. Please do not make a single edit, even to your own talk page, without an edit summary.

I am worried that you do not communicate with anyone. I have held out so many overtures of help, guidance and hints and tips that I do not understand why you insist on ploughing your own furrow in your own way.

Let me be clear. The path you are on is likely to get you blocked for increasing lengths of time, eventually indefinitely. I am not an administrator. I can't block you, but I am severely tempted to ask that you be blocked.

Please take advice, and take it now.

If you want an unbiased administrator's view, place {{adminhelpme}} on this page and ask for help below that. One will come by and offer you help very shortly afterwards. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 20:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Response 2

OK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lgcsmasamiya (talk • contribs)

I am reading into your response that you are going to take notice of my message to you. Good. I thank you for that. I see you as having huge energy and I do not want to see you discouuraged. Two things, please:

1. Please sign your own messages on your talk page by adding ~~~~ which translates to a signature automatically
2. You forgot the edit summary, despite agreeing to heed my advice. Please use edit summaries at all times

Please slow down and get it right. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 20:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Lgcsmasamiya, I'm the admin who blocked you last time - I didn't really want to, but I felt I needed to. And I will block you again if needed - though I sincerely hope it will not come to that. Now, communication is a key part of working here at Wikipedia, and that's something you don't seem to do much of. So, what I would like to see is some further explanation of your "OK" answer above - please explain exactly what you mean and exactly what you will do differently. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:32, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• BsZ, do you feel that Lgcsmasamiya would benefit form WP:MENTOR? I know many editors who started off imperfectly have foiund it to be of huge value. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:40, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, I think that would be an excellent idea. There's more information on how to find a mentor at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area, and there are some pretty good mentors currently accepting adoptees at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters. What do you say, Lgcsmasamiya? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I've seen such great results for the editors who join in that I would positively encourage it. I wish it had been around properly when I joined. I made a whole slew of errors and I would have found it very useful. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now stop reviewing and unreviewing

This edit shows me that you do not understand the meaning of stopping having anything whatsoever to do with the reviewing of articles. Yes, I will be checking to see if you made a mistake or not, and no, I will not retract this warning if you happened to be correct. You have agreed to leave this area alone. Others judge you to be lacking WP:COMPETENCE in this area. It is not just my judgment.

You agreed to stop and you have not stopped.

Among the good edits you create havoc. Your havoc is most unwelcome here. I am not the one to block you but I can tell you that you are in danger of a lengthy block if you persist in this behaviour. You are not helping the project at all. Please take this as a final warning. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 08:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Siam Shade discography, Lgcsmasamiya!

Wikipedia editor Meeeeeeee39 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Listing what the references are (such as the websites name/the content) next to the reference list would make the references easier to understand.

To reply, leave a comment on Meeeeeeee39's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Epifanio Jiménez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Popular Democratic Party and New Progressive Party

Pedro Piqueras (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Antena 3

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the Hilario Pino page!

Sulfurboy (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks :D Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 18:22, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent work to List of journalists killed in Honduras and the creation of Ángel Alfredo Villatoro! Crtew (talk) 16:24, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Oh, thanks :D Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 16:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your frequent and helpful contributions to the wiki in general. ReconditeRodent (talk) 20:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alberto Terrones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to El viejo doctor

Javier Estupiñán (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Forward

La Secta del trébol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to María Cristina

Novio, marido y amante (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tito Gómez

Pasaporte a Río (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Francisco de Paula

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the article of Virechana. It was very important. Abhijeet Safai (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the article Gambang kromong and Radya Pustaka Museum!--Rochelimit (talk) 17:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you reviewed Neonatal bowel obstruction, the article I have created. In the meantime, I have significantly contributed to it. I would insist you to re-review it. The article requires further improvements and you can definitely contribute to it as well. Diptanshu^Talk 03:39, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page has grown long. I insist that you to archive it and also set up automatic archival by adding the following code:

{{Archives |search= yes |bot= MiszaBot I |age= 90}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 2
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:Lgcsmasamiya/Archive %(counter)d
}}

Diptanshu^Talk 03:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Olga Gorokhova, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 02:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Panorama Porno (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to J-Rock

∠ Trigger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to J-Rock

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Benita Puértolas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. (Note that IMDB is not considered a reliable source - see WP:RS/IMDB)

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. An optimist on the run!   19:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What?

But she died in 1968, why are they trying to delete it for a living person?

Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 20:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(c/e) My bad, I misread the article and assumed it was a BLP. However, please add reliable sources (not IMDB), otherwise it's likely to be deleted anyway. An optimist on the run!   20:04, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no problem Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of members of the National Congress of Honduras, 2010–14, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages La Paz department and Colón department (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lgcsmasamiya,

I have noticed you have been patrolling my newly created pages. I appreciate you doing that. Would you be able to patrol the talkpages as well? I'll have more articles and talkpages to come. Once again, I appreciate what you've done. Adamdaley (talk) 00:04, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Breakfast television may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''[[Telediario|Telediario Matinal]]'' — [[TVE1]
• * ''[[Raňajojky]]'' (discontinued August 2009; will launch new project in cooperation with [[Fun Radio (Slovakia)|Fun

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of television presenters may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{columns-list|4|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article 16 dobles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DThomsen8 (talk) 02:12, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Un pecado por mes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uberaccount (talk) 03:09, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove deletion tags on pages without providing a reason. Uberaccount (talk) 03:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Un pecado por mes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Un pecado por mes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uberaccount (talk) 03:40, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see you reviewed Annie Oakley (1894 film), but the history does not show it. Tell me how you did it, so I can, too. --DThomsen8 (talk) 11:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Sander.v.Ginkel. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, List of Angry Birds Toons episodes, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 08:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lgcsmasamiya. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Lourdes Guerrero, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. EzPz (talk) 08:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

4º sen ascensor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Galicia

Pedro Erquicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Basque Country

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have requested speed deletion for an article you have reviewed. The article is a hoax, please check the pages log before reviewing [1]. --Ben Ben (talk) 16:05, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a cookie for a treat! It's been good to have you review almost all of my pages recently. You deserve a treat for a job well done! Thanks and see you around ^^ 001Jrm (talk) 05:28, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carlos Sobera, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Antena 3, La 2 and ¿Quién quiere ser millonario? (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Lgcsmasamiya, I would like to thank you for the help you gave me in this page! Muchas gracias, hasta luego.

Rei Momo (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Vilma Cecilia Morales. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ángel Darío Banegas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Heraldo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! Dear friend, I just realized you had reviewed my article. Thank you very much for your help!

Recién me doy cuenta que sos hondureño... te podia haber escrito en castellano... si sere boludo!

--Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 03:09, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing my Article. --(B)～（ー．ー）～(Z) (talk) 12:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Andrés Parra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Colombian and Casados con hijos

Modesto Rodas Alvarado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Sabanagrande and Choluteca

Aldo Calderón van Dyke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Honduran

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JanetteDoe (talk) 04:29, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continuing to mark pages as reviewed without actually reviewing them. When you review a page, you must make sure it meets basic quality standards, and you simply are not doing this, as evidenced by the many messages above as well as quick look at your reviews. You've let articles filled with unsourced information become "reviewed" without adding any cleanup tags or, in the case of BLP info, deleting it as is required by policy. Furthermore, you have never once responded to anyone's concerns about your edits. Wikipedia is a collaborative environment that requires group interaction--you can't just do whatever you want. You must discuss matters with other editors when they raise concerns with you, and you must stop causing lots of extra work for other people by marking things as reviewed without actually reviewing them. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Qwyrxian (talk) 15:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of television presenters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiroshi Abe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for your recent contributions of the Mexican senators! Your work is highly appreciated and indispensable. Keep it up. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 19:40, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Los Pincheira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francisco Reyes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lgcsmasamiya. You have new messages at Qwyrxian's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi, could you please stop creating pages on non-notable asteroids? The articles that you create must follow the appropriate section of WP:NCASTRO, or they will simply be redirected to the proper lists. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:24, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've also noticed a lot of very short stubs on non-notable asteroids. Please stop, or they risk being redirected/deleted. — kikichugirl ^inquire 23:43, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited José Rosas Aispuro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamazula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of programs broadcast by TVE may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done

Thanks for the info, i already fixed it. Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 00:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luis Mariñas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Argentine films of 1960, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Culpable (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arturo De la Rosa Escalante (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Comondú

Jose María Martínez Martínez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Valle de Guadalupe, Jalisco

José Ignacio Duarte Murillo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chihuahua

Mario Alberto Dávila Delgado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Frontera

Pedro Ignacio Domínguez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chihuahua

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rubén Acosta Montoya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to have to ask you again: please stop creating stubs on many non-notable asteroids. As I mentioned above, they clearly, without any ambiguity, do not meet WP:NASTRO at all, and thus I will be systematically redirecting them in the next few days. In the meantime, please refrain from creating any new stubs on non-notable asteroids. StringTheory11 (t • c) 04:15, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing Alexandre Gilbert, Lgcsmasamiya.

Unfortunately Randykitty has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

More eyes needed, references are mostly about expositions or artists, not this person (some references don't even mention him). Other references seem to be to non-reliable sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Randykitty's talk page.

Great work on Parliamentary candidates in the Honduran general election, 2013‎, thanks a lot. --Soman (talk) 01:59, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, maybe you can start an article about the Mayoral candidates, I can help you completing it.Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 02:41, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for reviewing the page Memories with Maya. I also saw from your Wiki page you've made over 3000 contributions to wiki. - Just a small note to say Thanks. Cly3d (talk) 17:17, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to LIX Legislature of the Mexican Congress may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {| class="wikitable"

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the article about Memphis record producer DJ Sound. Ben0kto (talk) 12:54, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for reviewing numerous articles on Wikipedia. Much appreciated! :-) Garybekker (talk) 20:38, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Manuel Rafael Huerta, Lgcsmasamiya!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

good work

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your multiple mexican politician stub articles. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francisco Pelayo Covarrubias, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comondú (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lgcsmasamiya,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged José Isidro Moreno Árcega for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blurred Lines 18:29, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your efforts in creating articles for Mexican politicians. Just a friendly advice, it's better to use "As of 2013, X was a deputy..." or "X was elected to the Y congress in the Z election" rather than "Currently...". The problem with using "Currently" is that is obliges wikipedians to update all the articles after next election, and in many cases this doesn't happen. --Soman (talk) 21:21, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Randykitty. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Nintendomagasinet, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 08:18, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Lgcsmasamiya.

I've re-reviewed Curtis Australia, which you just reviewed; it had several problems with it, including the bare URLs being used for references. When reviewing, please try to ensure you mark the problems with the article so that other users can fix them. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 04:14, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto Crime Investigation Department (India), which has clear prose problems. Ironholds (talk) 04:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Package and Thierry Cassuto needed more inline citations, Energetický a průmyslový holding has bare URLs, Derivations of the Lorentz transformations is clearly mostly unreferenced: Lgcsmasamiya, please take a break so we can have a conversation about this. Reading up, I see you've been warned and blocked about this before, and have not engaged in conversations about it. I'm giving you one last chance to do so before I take it to the site administrators recommending a block for you. Ironholds (talk) 04:19, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Marco Alonso Vela, Lgcsmasamiya!

Wikipedia editor Tritario just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good job with this, everything needed to approve this article is here!

To reply, leave a comment on Tritario's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ironholds (talk) 16:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've proposed that you should be indefinitely blocked unless you promise to stop all page patrolling. You can respond in the thread at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive819#Lgcsmasamiya's patrolling if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:28, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lgcsmasamiya,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Panorama Porno for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tritario (talk) 17:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lgcsmasamiya. Over the last year or so several users have expressed concerns over the way you review new articles. This is ok - we all make mistakes and can learn from them - but as you haven't responded adequately to these concerns it leaves me with little choice but to block you. If you want to discuss this then please do so on this talk page. If you feel this block is not needed then you may use the {{unblock}} template to appeal it. Regards Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 20:21, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Response

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lgcsmasamiya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok, i think that i got this so far,but however, there are a lot of unreviewed articles, some of then have been well structures, at least you have to tell me for how many time i will be blocked Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 20:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We're going to need to hear more than "I got this", because you've said things like that before and then the trouble has continued. What is it that you've "got"? What do you think was the problem with how you were editing, and how do you intend to change that? Are you willing to have a long conversation here with experienced users about how to patrol correctly before you touch a single new article in the patrol queue? Do you understand that it might be the case that you will have to stop patrolling for a long time while you learn how things work, and that if you're unblocked you can not go back to doing things the way you have been doing them? A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To answer a question you asked Lgcsmasamiya, you are blocked "indefinitely". That means you will not be unblocked until you can show to us that you are going to change the way you edit. You don't need to post a new unblock request; just answer Flufflernutters several questions below. As one of the prior blocking admins, I'll also help review and provide advice as needed. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:21, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked you. Please stop doing NPP until you've learned how to do it, but in mu opinion this was not a valid rerason for an indefinite block. The matter is being discussed at the Administrators Noticeboard/Incidents. here. DGG ( talk ) 02:08, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To continue, you must not patrol articles! We can discuss later what you need to know in order to patrol them. It is possible that I may be over-ruled at NPP, and your block will be reinstated. It certainly will if you continue to patrol new pages. . — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) 02:15, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I proposed a ban on your reviewing new pages. That ban is likely to be accepted. If you choose not to respond to comments by other editors on your new page reviews, it will remain in place indefinitely: a large part of the community's dissatisfaction and one of the reasons for your block (kindly undone by DGG) is your unwillingness to even acknowledge that other users wish to discuss matters with you, and I should warn you that uncommunicative editors sometimes to end up being blocked indefinitely. This is a collaborative project: time to start talking. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Your unblock request, by the way, suggests that you don't know why you were blocked. I strongly urge you to read the comments at WP:ANI, or this may well start all over again. It is possible that there's a huge backlog of pages to look at, but things simply have to be done right. Drmies (talk) 16:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Luis Manuel Arias Pallares, Lgcsmasamiya!

Wikipedia editor Daniel Cavallari just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

{{{3}}}

To reply, leave a comment on Daniel Cavallari's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

As per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Ban proposal the community has enacted a topic ban as follows:

"User:Lgcsmasamiya is banned from WP:NPP until they have proven to experienced editors (Kudpung and DGG, for instance), that they are capable of reviewing articles in ways that confirm to our guidelines in regards to such things as referencing and copy-paste problems, and make a firm commitment to be responsive to issues raised by other editors and be willing to make changes accordingly."

Accordingly, until and unless this topic ban is lifted by community consensus, do not engage in New Page Patrol or the review of recently created articles under any name. Failure to abide by this restriction would constitute valid grounds for you to be blocked by any administrator. I am sorry to have to be the community's agent in imposing this restriction. Fortunately, any time that you can convince a set of experienced editors that you will do NPP within community norms as specified above, the topic ban can be lifted. DES ^(talk) 23:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Mexican Barnstar of National Merit
		For your excellent work in creating stub articles for Mexican politicians - I salute your dedication, and say muchas gracias! Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
		this WikiAward was given to Lgcsmasamiya by Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. on 15:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Long overdue, too, if you ask me. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I just wanted to let you know I declined the speedy deletion nomination of Doge (meme). For better or worse the article does at least attempt to establish notability, and provides multiple legitimate sources. You may wish to initiate an AfD on the article, which is the next logical step. Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your hard work at patrolling. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:49, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adriana González Carrillo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Action Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lgcsmasamiya. I would like to thank you for reviewing many articles I created in the past. Can I ask a favor? If you can take a look at three more articles of mine that haven't been reviewed and if they are OK review them? The articles are:

• Handle with Care
• Death and the Maiden
• For Whom the Bell Tolls

Thanks again. TeamGale 14:42, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! :) TeamGale 09:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm having trouble with a user called Zebbe who keeps changing information on my article. On several attempts the user changes the credits on the article Descent_to_the_Underworld(album). I tried talking to user Zebbe but he ignores mz request. I come to you for help as you're the administrator who reviewed my article. I request blocking the user from further changes as I believe he'll never stop vandalising the article. Thank you Csabi911 (talk) 12:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rafael Moreno Valle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Action Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating María Elena Orantes, Lgcsmasamiya!

Wikipedia editor Tritario just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good Job.

To reply, leave a comment on Tritario's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi Can you review article The Hobbit: There and Back Again (film) please...--Joseph 03:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy Hondurian mate, just curious, why do you need to "review" a page? What happens then? Cheers! --That Amazing Guy (talk) 13:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lgcsmasamiya,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged XERC-AM for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Op47 (talk) 22:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	This barnstar has been awarded to you for adding 3 categories to Cartoonito (Spain)! TDFan2006 (talk) 12:51, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lgcsmasamiya. You have new messages at Talk:Hunter_Hunted_(band)#speedy_deletion_tag.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—rybec 00:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lgcsmasamiya. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hunter Hunted (band), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Band has been the subject of press coverage (A7) and article doesn't seem overly promotional. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:26, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to patrol all of the articles from that split. I really appreciate that! Zell Faze (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One question: I've created two pages today, but the links are not turning blue. Wikipedia is having some problem today? Janperson (talk) 23:13, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i've noted this problem since yesterday, but the pages are still active Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 23:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment! Happy New Year. Twozenhauer (talk) 01:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lgcsmasamiya,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Arrayán (TV series) for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Op47 (talk) 15:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What?

But i'm not blocked right now and i wasn't blocked in that moment Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 16:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the alarm. The new pages feed tool said that you were. I did check and thought the same as you. I just wanted a second opinion before reporting a bug in the tool. I left a note on the article talk page to that effect, but forgot that you would get a warning. I trust there are no hard feelings. Regards Op47 (talk) 17:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lgcsmasamiya, thank you for reviewing my first page!

I'm not sure that "Balkansky syr" can be categorized as Czech cheese. It's not a traditional Czech cheese, it's just produced there as other cheeses as Edam, Gauda etc. It's something as Czech variant of the Greek feta or the Bulgarian sirene. These are just details, I'm trying punctual :-)

Tuzemak (talk) 17:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Tuzemak[reply]

Sorry to have to do this, but :

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating a community imposed ban requiring you to avoid new page patrolling. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Tiderolls 19:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lgcsmasamiya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

F*** this, i'm leaving this sh*t right now, block me for 30 years if you want, this is so ridiculous, there are worst things on this site, bye Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 22:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Neither of these are unblock requests. Please don't use this template to ask questions, express your frustration, or converse with admins. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 22:37, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Well, that's certainly the course to take if you really want to be blocked for 30 years. Another option is meet the original conditions of your topic ban and you could be unblocked in 30 minutes. You're in the driver's seat on this. Tiderolls 22:24, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well sorry, i was a little upset for other things, however, is there not an option for "blank" the New Pages Feed in my account? Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 22:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC) | decline = Neither of these are unblock requests. Please don't use this template to ask questions, express your frustration, or converse with admins. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 22:37, 1 January 2014 (UTC)}}[reply]

Disable these unblock requests and I will try to help you get unblocked. It's dinner time for me so I'll be back in an hour. Tiderolls 22:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry again, i'm gonna delete this unrelated request. Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 22:46, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question, New page patrol is voluntary so it is up to you to refrain from accessing the feed. Is there some obstacle for you in learning the proper method for reviewing the new articles? That would be the optimum solution. Tiderolls 23:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot of good articles in the unreviewed split, can them considered "not-improved"? Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How does that impact your actions? Tiderolls 23:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but... Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 23:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to be unblocked you will have to convince editors who are well-versed in the topic that you can patrol new pages properly. So far this discussion is not convincing me that you have any intention of complying with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I will do what I can to help you but I will not waste my time on someone that does not want my help. Again, the decision is yours. Tiderolls 23:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 00:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So, if you're prepared to offer some statement that you're willing to edit within policy and convention, I can notify the editors that would be qualified to assess your intent. I would advise that you read the comments at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive819#Lgcsmasamiya's patrolling and familiarize yourself with the standards for review set forth at Wikipedia:New pages patrol before posting. If, after reading the pertinent texts, you have questions or require clarification, ask here and I will find someone to address your concerns. Good luck, Tiderolls 00:17, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 01:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't locate any more administrator Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 22:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand how that's important, but you can ask for administrator help by using the correct template. Look at Template:Admin help. Tiderolls 00:17, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

What can i do so you can block me or, at least, how many time i'll be blocked?

--Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 00:25, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your current block is an "indefinite" block which means that it'll last until you assure the community that you will not violate your topic ban again. Please use the {{unblock}} template to request an unblock.--v/r - TP 07:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lgcsmasamiya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please, i'm not sure about this, but i promise to not violate the typical patrolling standards and rules, i think this is my last chance con convince you all so can you give me more recommendations in case i¿ll fail again?. Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 15:34, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are banned from new page patrolling. That is all; simply agree to stay completely away from it and you'll likely be unblocked. ----jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You're missing the very important point that you have already been restricted from patrolling at all, Lgcsmasamiya. Using an unblock request to tell us that you will patrol well if you're unblocked is basically telling us "I don't plan to follow the restriction I'm under!", and an unblock request that says that is unlikely to be greeted with anything but refusal. If you want to be unblocked, you need to convince a reviewing administrator that you will follow the restriction the community placed you under (no patrolling) and that the community can trust you to keep your word about that this time around, since you didn't keep your word about it last time. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to stay away from NPP Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 16:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond, f*ck Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 16:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]