Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:The Day We Fight Back: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:56, 16 January 2014

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. As noted below, opposition to a good-faith proposal is not a valid reason to delete it (and even rejected proposals are retained for historical reference). For the record, I'm among those opposing this particular proposal. —David Levy 02:56, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The Day We Fight Back

Wikipedia should not be used as a platform to push a thought or issue. The very thought of this being used is saddening as it violates many policies. It is nonneutral. It is POV. Wiki is an encyclopedia, and theres really no gain to have to participate in this event. Which btw, it will probably not be rembered or have much impact. Beerest 2 talk 02:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Ya don't delete a proposal mid-draft because you personally expect that you'll reject the proposal when it's completed. --HectorMoffet (talk) 02:08, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Wikipedia is being used during this day of action/awareness to inform, as per usual. petrarchan47 t c 02:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move; there's a proposal to rename the page to Wikipedia:Surveillance Awareness day. If there are POV problems with encyclopedic content within the page, they may be corrected without deletion. The MfD guidelines advise:

Proposals still under discussion generally should not be nominated. If you oppose a proposal, discuss it on the policy page's discussion page. Consider being bold and improving the proposal. Modify the proposal so that it gains consensus. Also note that even if a policy fails to gain consensus, it is often useful to retain it as a historical record, for the benefit of future editors.

Beerest 2's only edit to the project was to add the {{mfd}} template. —rybec 02:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The purpose behind this is for the main page to have entirely neutral unbiased content.....that just happens to be cratered around a particular theme. It would be no different to an animal-themed day (on the day of a nature-related event), or a maths-themed day in the anniversary of einsteins birth, think of it as the google doodle of Wikipedia.--Coin945 (talk) 02:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep -A1candidate (talk) 02:47, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{mfd top collapse|1='''[[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:The Day We Fight Back]]'''}}|}}<div class="boilerplate mfd" style="background-color: #E3D2FB; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+__NOINDEX__
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to nominate a miscellany page for deletion, you must manually edit the MfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/NAMESPACE:PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result of the discussion was '''speedy keep'''.  As noted below, opposition to a good-faith proposal is not a valid reason to delete it (and even rejected proposals are retained for historical reference).  For the record, I'm among those opposing this particular proposal.  —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 02:56, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 ====[[Wikipedia:The Day We Fight Back]]====
@@ Line 9: / Line 16: @@
 * '''Speedy keep''' -[[User:A1candidate|A1candidate]] ([[User talk:A1candidate|talk]]) 02:47, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div>
+{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{collapse bottom}}|}}