Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions

Arbitration​Committee

Wikipedia Arbitration
About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)
Track related changes
v t e

A motion that was proposed for the Arbitration Request initiated on February 17, 2014 has passed. The motion can be found here. The following is the text of the motion:

• The committee notes that it is not in dispute that User:Kevin Gorman has acted out of process and in a manner which is incompatible with the standards to which administrators are held.
• The committee notes and accepts Kevin Gorman's assurances that he has learned by his mistakes and will not repeat them.
• Kevin Gorman is strongly admonished.
• The request shall be filed as "Kevin Gorman".
• The request for a full case is declined.

For the Arbitration Committee, Rockfang (talk) 01:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Archived discussion

The following motion proposed regarding the Toddst1 request for arbitration has been passed:

The "Toddst1" request for arbitration is accepted, but a formal case will not be opened unless and until Toddst1 returns to active status as an administrator. If Toddst1 resigns his administrative tools or is desysopped for inactivity the case will be closed with no further action. Toddst1 is instructed not to use his admin tools in any way while the case is pending; doing so will be grounds for summary desysopping.

For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 15:17, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

Motion 1

The following sanction is vacated with immediate effect.

Motion 2

During the original case Ryulong was admonished for excessive off-wiki requests of an inappropriate nature in remedy 3b, which reads in part:

The admonishment is left in place as warning not to return to the excessive and/or inappropriate behavior of the past, but the final sentence "Any further occurrence would lead to sanctions." is to be stricken.

For the Arbitration Committee, Rschen7754 17:59, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Archived discussion

In accordance with the standing procedure on inactivity,

1. The checkuser and oversight permissions of Fred Bauder (talk · contribs) are removed.
2. The checkuser permissions of Jdforrester (talk · contribs) are removed. (His oversight permissions are not.)

At his own request, the checkuser permissions of Frank (talk · contribs) have also been removed. Frank has let the committee know he currently has little time to contribute as a functionary, but may return later in the year.

The committee sincerely thanks all three functionaries for their years of service, and all the current checkuser and oversight permission holders for the invaluable contributions they make as functionaries.

Approved by: AGK, LFaraone, T. Canens, Carcharoth, Roger Davies, Worm That Turned, Floquenbeam, David Fuchs, NativeForeigner, and Beeblebrox; none objecting.

For the Arbitration Committee, AGK [•] 22:58, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Archived discussion

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

• By way of clarification, the formal warning issued by Kevin Gorman was out of process and therefore has no effect. The provisions of WP:BLPBAN will be reviewed by the Arbitration Committee and where necessary updated.

For the Arbitration Committee,--S Philbrick(Talk) 00:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Archived discussion

The Arbitration Committee has recently been conducting a review of the discretionary sanctions system. You may wish to comment on the newest (third) draft update to the system, which has just been posted to the review page. Comments are welcome on the review talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, AGK [•] 00:19, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By motion, the ban of Will Beback (talk · contribs) has been suspended by the Arbitration Committee, subject to restrictions set out on their talk page.

• Support: Beeblebrox, Carcharoth, David Fuchs, Floquenbeam, GorillaWarfare, LFaraone, NativeForeigner, Newyorkbrad, Roger Davies, Seraphimblade, Worm That Turned
• Oppose: AGK, Timotheus Canens
• Not voting: Salvio giuliano

For the Arbitration Committee, Carcharoth (talk) 02:57, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this

By motion, the ban of Ferahgo the Assassin (talk · contribs) has been suspended by the Arbitration Committee, subject to restrictions set out on their talk page.

• Support: Beeblebrox, Carcharoth, David Fuchs, Floquenbeam, GorillaWarfare, LFaraone, NativeForeigner, Newyorkbrad, Roger Davies, Salvio giuliano, Seraphimblade, Timotheus Canens, Worm That Turned
• Oppose: AGK

For the Arbitration Committee, Carcharoth (talk) 03:03, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this