Assault weapons legislation in the United States: Difference between revisions

{{redirect|Assault weapons ban}}

'''Assault weapons legislation in the United States''' refers to [[Bill (law)|bill]]s and [[Law of the United States|law]]s (active, expired, proposed or failed) that define and restrict or make illegal the manufacture, transfer, and possession of [[assault weapon]]s. How these firearms are defined and regulated varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In 1994, the [[US Justice Department|Justice Department]] gave this basic definition: "In general, assault weapons are [[Semi-automatic firearm|semiautomatic]] firearms with a [[High-capacity magazine|large magazine]] of ammunition that are designed and configured for rapid fire and combat use."<ref name=Levs130113>{{cite news |last=Levs |first=Josh |date=January 31, 2013 |title=Loaded language poisons gun debate |url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/31/politics/gun-language/index.html |publisher=Cable News Network |accessdate=April 27, 2014 }}</ref>

The [[Federal Assault Weapons Ban]] (AWB) was enacted in 1994, and expired in 2004. Attempts to renew it have failed, as have attempts to pass a new ban, such as the [[Assault Weapons Ban of 2013]] (AWB 2013). Seven U.S. states have assault weapons bans: three were enacted before the 1994 federal ban and four more passed before the federal ban expired.

The 1994 federal and 1989 state ban in California were prompted by the 1989 [[Cleveland Elementary School shooting (Stockton)|Cleveland Elementary School shooting]] in Stockton, California. Existing and proposed weapon bans come under renewed interest in the wake of [[mass shooting]]s, most recently after the December 2012 [[Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting]] in Newtown, Connecticut. In addition to state bans, [[Washington, D.C.]], and some U.S. counties and municipalities have assault weapons laws.

==History==

In January 1989, [[Cleveland Elementary School shooting (Stockton)|34 children and a teacher were shot in Stockton, Calif.]], using a semi-automatic replica of an [[AK-47]]. Five children died.<ref name="PittsPress 900523">{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Senate restricts assault weapon imports, production |url=http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=onk0AAAAIBAJ&sjid=6pYEAAAAIBAJ&dq=assault-weapon&pg=7212%2C4372530 |newspaper=The Pittsburgh Press |agency=Associated Press |date=May 23, 1990 |page=A13 }}</ref><ref name="Pazniokas 931220">{{cite news |title=One Gun's Journey Into A Crime |first=Mark |last=Pazniokas |url=http://articles.courant.com/1993-12-20/news/0000000491_1_gun-control-assault-weapons-assault-weapon-law |newspaper=The Courant |location=Hartford, CT |date=December 20, 1993 }}</ref><ref name="Roth-Koper ImpactEval1997">{{cite journal |last=Roth |first=Jeffrey A. |last2=Koper |first2=Christopher S. |year=1997 |title=Impact Evaluation of the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act of 1994 |location=Washington, D.C. |publisher=The Urban Institute |format=PDF |url=http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/aw_final.pdf }}</ref>{{rp|10}} President [[George H. W. Bush|George H.W. Bush]] banned the import of semiautomatic rifles in March 1989,<ref name="Mohr 890315">{{cite news |title=U.S. Bans Imports of Assault Rifles in Shift by Bush |first=Charles |last=Mohr |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1989/03/15/us/us-bans-imports-of-assault-rifles-in-shift-by-bush.html |newspaper=The New York Times |date=March 15, 1989 }}</ref> and made the ban permanent in July.<ref name="Rasky 890708">{{cite news |title=Import Ban on Assault Rifles Becomes Permanent |first=Susan F. |last=Rasky |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/08/us/import-ban-on-assault-rifles-becomes-permanent.html |newspaper=The New York Times |date=July 8, 1989 }}</ref>

In May 1989, [[California]] became the first state in the U.S. to pass an assault weapons ban,<ref name=Ingram890519>{{cite news |last=Ingram |first=Carl |date=May 19, 1989 |title=Assault Gun Ban Wins Final Vote : Deukmejian's Promised Approval Would Make It 1st Such U.S. Law |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1989-05-19/news/mn-112_1_assault-weapons-ban-military-style-assault-types-of-semiautomatic-rifles |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |location= |publisher= |accessdate=April 20, 2014 }}</ref> followed by [[New Jersey]] 12 months later,<ref name=DePalma900518>{{cite news |last=DePalma |first=Anthony |date=May 18, 1990 |title=New Jersey Votes the Strictest Law In the Nation on Assault Weapons |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1990/05/18/nyregion/new-jersey-votes-the-strictest-law-in-the-nation-on-assault-weapons.html |newspaper=New York Times |location= |publisher= |accessdate=April 20, 2014 }}</ref> and [[Connecticut]] in June 1993.<ref name=Johnson930609>{{cite news |last=Johnson |first=Kirk |date=June 9, 1993 |title=Weicker Signs Bill to Forbid Assault Rifles |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/09/nyregion/weicker-signs-bill-to-forbid-assault-rifles.html |newspaper=New York Times |location= |publisher= |accessdate=April 20, 2014 }}</ref> A federal-level ban was passed in September 1994, but it expired in 2004. Between its passage and expiration, four more states passed assault weapons bans: [[Hawaii]], [[Maryland]], [[Massachusetts]], and [[New York]].<ref name=Koerner040916>{{cite journal |last=Koerner |first=Brendan |date=September 16, 2004 |title=What Is an Assault Weapon? At last, you can get a semiautomatic rifle with a bayonet. |url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2004/09/what_is_an_assault_weapon.html |journal=Slate |location= |publisher=The Slate Group |accessdate=April 27, 2014 }}</ref>

In December 2012, [[Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting|20 children and 6 adults were killed in Newtown, Connecticut]] using a [[AR-15|.223 Bushmaster semiautomatic rifle]].<ref name=Barron121215>{{cite news |last=Barron |first=James |date=December 15, 2012 |title=Children Were All Shot Multiple Times With a Semiautomatic, Officials Say |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/16/nyregion/gunman-kills-20-children-at-school-in-connecticut-28-dead-in-all.html |newspaper=New York Times |location= |publisher=New York Times Company |accessdate=April 12, 2014 }}</ref><ref name=Levy121221>{{cite news |last=Levy |first=Gabrielle |date=December 21, 2012 |title=Obama responds to gun violence petition |url=http://www.upi.com/blog/2012/12/21/Obama-responds-to-gun-violence-petition/1021356100902/ |newspaper= |location= |publisher=United Press International |type=blog |accessdate=May 26, 2014 }}</ref><ref name=Steinhauer130124>{{cite news |title=Senator Unveils Bill to Limit Semiautomatic Arms |author=Steinhauer, Jennifer |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/25/us/politics/senator-unveils-bill-to-limit-semiautomatic-arms.html |newspaper=The New York Times |date=January 24, 2013 |accessdate=May 26, 2014}}</ref>

In January 2013, {{USBill|113|S.|150}}, the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 (AWB 2013), was introduced in the [[U.S. Senate]].<ref name=CSPAN130124>{{cite AV media |people=Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Rev. Gary Hall, Rep. [[Carolyn McCarthy]], et al |date=January 24, 2013 |title=Assault Weapons Ban Bill |medium=video |url=http://www.c-span.org/video/?310581-1/assault-weapons-ban-bill |format= |location=Washington, D.C. |publisher=National Cable Satellite Corporation |accessdate=April 13, 2014 }}</ref> The bill was similar to the 1994 ban, but differed in that it used a one-feature test for a firearm to qualify as an assault weapon rather than the two-feature test of the 1994 ban.<ref name=USAToday130124>{{cite news |last=Kucinich |first=Jackie |date=January 24, 2013 |title=Democrats reintroduce assault weapons ban |url=http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/01/24/assault-weapons-ban-feinstein-democrats/1861493/ |newspaper=USA Today |location= |publisher= |accessdate=April 13, 2014 }}</ref> On April 17, 2013, AWB 2013 failed on a vote of 60 to 40.<ref name=Simon130417>{{cite news |title=Senate votes down Feinstein's assault weapons ban |last=Simon |first=Richard |url=http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-dianne-feinstein-assault-weapons-vote-20130417,0,5349684.story |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |date=April 17, 2013 |accessdate= }}</ref>

===Origin and definition of the term ''assault weapon''===

{{main|Assault weapon}}

How assault weapons are defined and banned varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The term ''assault weapon'' may have been created by the media,<ref name="Assault_Weapon_media_invention">{{cite news |title=In State With 'Assault Weapons' Ban, Lanza's Rifle Still Legal |author=Kauffman, Matthew |url=http://articles.courant.com/2012-12-18/news/hc-newtown-assault-weapons-20121217_1_assault-weapon-lethal-weapon-rifle |newspaper=The Courant |location=Hartford, Connecticut |date=December 18, 2012 |accessdate=January 2, 2013 |quote=The term 'assault weapon,' as used by the media, is a media invention. These are semi-automatic firearms that have military cosmetic characteristics. They look like our military firearms, but they're not.}}</ref> or by gun control activists,<ref name="intentional_confusion">{{cite web |url=http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/Tartaro1.htm |title= The Great Assault Weapon Hoax |publisher= University of Dayton Law Review Symposium, Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, vol. 20, no. 2, 1995: 557 |author= Tartaro, Joseph P. |year=1995 |accessdate=January 3, 2013 |quote=One of the key elements of the anti-gun strategy to gull the public into supporting bans on the so-called "assault weapons" is to foster confusion. As stated previously, the public does not know the difference between a full automatic and a semi-automatic firearm. They have been further hoodwinked by the television charades of people like New York's former Governor Mario Cuomo talking about semi-automatic firearms while the camera shows a full automatic firing. Fully automatic weapons have been strictly regulated and registered since 1934. Real assault weapons are controlled by the 1934 law and by laws in most states. There is no need for a new law on semi-automatic firearms. However, the anti-gunners responsible for the hoax have continued to perpetuate it by exploiting public confusion.}}</ref><ref name="Sugarmann_popularized">{{cite news |title=Is it fair to call them ‘assault weapons’? |author=Blake, Aaron |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/17/is-it-fair-to-call-them-assault-weapons/ |newspaper=Washington Post |date=January 17, 2013 |accessdate=January 30, 2013 |quote=The term 'assault weapon' became widely used starting the late 1980s. Many attribute its popularization to a 1988 paper written by gun-control activist and Violence Policy Center founder Josh Sugarmann and the later reaction to a mass shooting at a Stockton, Calif., school in January 1989. }}</ref> or by the firearms industry itself.<ref name=GDBG2AWs2008>{{cite book |last=Peterson |first=Phillip |year=2008 |title=Gun Digest Buyer's Guide to Assault Weapons |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=fd9Qc0neMjYC&pg=PA11#v=onepage&q&f=false |publisher=Gun Digest Books |location=Iola, Wisconsin |isbn=978-0896896802 |quote=The popularly held idea that the term 'assault weapon' originated with anti-gun activists is wrong. The term was first adopted by manufacturers, wholesalers, importers and dealers in the American firearms industry to stimulate sales of certain firearms that did not have an appearance that was familiar to many firearms owners. The manufacturers and gun writers of the day needed a catchy name to identify this new type of gun. }}</ref><ref name=NYTimesComplicated>{{cite news |title=Even Defining 'Assault Rifles' Is Complicated |author=Goode, Erica |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/17/us/even-defining-assault-weapons-is-complicated.html?pagewanted=all |newspaper=New York Times |date=January 16, 2013 |accessdate=January 18, 2013}}</ref><ref name=SJMNWhatIs>{{cite news |title=Assault Weapons: What Are They, and Should They Be Banned? |author=Richman, Josh |url=http://www.mercurynews.com/nation-world/ci_22396050/assault-weapons-what-are-they-and-should-they |newspaper=San Jose Mercury News |date=January 18, 2013 |accessdate=January 19, 2013}}</ref><ref name=VPCGILies>{{cite web |url=http://www.vpc.org/studies/hosesix.htm |title=Bullet Hoses: Semiautomatic Assault Weapons—What Are They? What's So Bad About Them? |author=<!--no byline--> |year=2003 |publisher=Violence Policy Center |location=Washington, D.C. |at=The Gun Industry's Lies}}</ref> The term is sometimes [[conflation|conflated]] with ''[[assault rifle]]'', which refers to military rifles capable of [[automatic firearm|fully automatic]] fire.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/39165/assault-rifle |title="Assault rifle." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2010. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 03 Jul. 2010 |publisher=Britannica.com |date= |accessdate=January 2, 2013 }}</ref> (In the U.S., such firearms are regulated by federal and state laws.) In 1994, the U.S. Justice Department gave this basic definition: "In general, assault weapons are semiautomatic firearms with a [[High-capacity magazine|large magazine]] of ammunition that were designed and configured for rapid fire and combat use."<ref name=Levs130113>{{cite news |last=Levs |first=Josh |date=January 31, 2013 |title=Loaded language poisons gun debate |url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/31/politics/gun-language/index.html |publisher=Cable News Network |accessdate=April 27, 2014 }}</ref> Gun rights advocates prefer the term ''[[modern sporting rifle]]'', which was created by the firearms industry in 2009.<ref name=OutdoorWireLuthRetires>{{cite web|title=DPMS Founder and President Retires|url=http://www.theoutdoorwire.com/story/1260775574jux81fpyv51|publisher=The Outdoor Wire Digital Network|date=14 December 2009|accessdate=16 August 2013|quote=Luth's quest to introduce the hunting market to the AR platform was recognized in January 2009 when he was named to the Outdoor Life's OL-25, and later chosen by online voters as the OL-25 "Reader's Choice" recipient. The recent campaign by the NSSF to educate hunters everywhere about the "modern sporting rifle" can be directly attributed to Luth's push to make AR rifles acceptable firearms in the field, the woods and on the range.}}</ref>

One of the earliest official uses of the term dates to 1985 when California Assemblyman [[Art Agnos]] introduced a bill seeking to place restrictions on semi-automatic firearms capable of using detachable magazines of 20 rounds or more.<ref name=G&A1985>{{cite journal|title=California: gun control's primary target.|journal=Guns & Ammo Magazine|date=November 1, 1985}}</ref> In his bill, [[California Assembly Bill 1509 (1985)|AB 1509]], these guns were categorized as "assault firearms".<ref name=G&A1985/> Speaking to the Assembly Public Safety Committee Agnos said, "The only use for assault weapons is to shoot people."<ref name=LATimes-Ingram>{{cite news |last=Ingram |first=Carl |title=Restricting of Assault-Type Guns Okd by Assembly Unit |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1985-04-09/news/mn-27984_1_machine-guns |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |date=April 9, 1985}}</ref>

==Enacted and active==

{{Move portions from|Gun control after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting|sections "New York" and "Connecticut" and "Maryland"|section=y|date=April 2014}}

<div class="tright">

{| class="wikitable plainrowheaders" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;"

|-

|+U.S. Assault Weapons Bans by Jurisdiction

! scope="col"| Jurisdiction

! scope="col"| Status

! scope="col"| - By Make/

Model

! scope="col"| Semiauto

rifles

! scope="col"| Semiauto

pistols

! scope="col"| Shotguns

! scope="col"| Features

test

! scope="col"| Magazine

capacity

|-

! scope="row" | California<ref name=SGLAW-CA>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/assault-weapons-in-california/ |title=Assault Weapons in California |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=January 2, 2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref>

| In force

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

|-

! scope="row" | Connecticut<ref name=SGLAW-CT>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/assault-weapons-in-connecticut/ |title=Assault Weapons in Connecticut |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=August 8, 2013 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref>

| In force

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

|-

! scope="row" | District of Columbia<ref name=SGLAW-DC>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/assault-weapons-in-washington-d-c/ |title=Assault Weapons in the District of Columbia |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=January 2, 2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref>

| In force

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

|-

! scope="row" | Hawaii<ref name=SGLAW-HI>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/assault-weapons-in-hawaii/ |title=Assault Weapons in Hawaii |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=January 2, 2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref>

| In force

|

|

| {{X mark}}

|

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

|-

! scope="row" | Maryland<ref name=SGLAW-MD>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/assault-weapons-in-maryland/ |title=Assault Weapons in Maryland |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=January 2, 2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref>

| In force

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

|-

! scope="row" | Massachusetts<ref name=SGLAW-MA>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/assault-weapons-in-massachusetts/ |title=Assault Weapons in Massachusetts |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=January 2, 2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref>

| In force

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

|-

! scope="row" | New Jersey<ref name=SGLAW-NJ>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/assault-weapons-in-new-jersey/ |title=Assault Weapons in New Jersey |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=January 1, 2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref>

| In force

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

|-

! scope="row" | New York<ref name=SGLAW-NY>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/assault-weapons-in-new-york/ |title=Assault Weapons in New York |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=January 1, 2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref>

| In force

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

| {{X mark}}

|}

</div>

=====1989=====

In May 1989, [[California]] became the first state in the U.S. to pass an assault weapons ban, after the January 1989 Cleveland Elementary School shooting in Stockton.<ref name=Ingram890519/> The Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989, or AWCA, banned semi-automatic firearms that it classified as assault weapons: over 50 specific brands and models of rifles, pistols, and shotguns. It also banned [[Magazine_(firearms)|magazines]] that it classified as large capacity (those able to hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition). Guns and magazines legally owned at the time the law was passed were [[Grandfather clause|grandfathered]] in if registered with the California Department of Justice.<ref name=AWGuide2000>{{cite web |url=http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/pdfs/firearms/forms/awguide.pdf |title=Assault Weapons Identification Guide 2000 |author=Office of the Attorney General |date=November 2001 |website=oag.ca.gov |publisher=California Department of Justice |accessdate=April 21, 2014}}</ref><ref name=CFL2007>{{cite web |url=http://ag.ca.gov/firearms/forms/pdf/Cfl2007.pdf |title=California Firearms Laws 2007 |author=Attorney General |date=June 8, 2012 |website=ag.ca.gov |publisher=California Department of Justice |accessdate=April 21, 2014}}</ref>

=====1999=====

In March 1999, State Senator [[Don Perata]] introduced [[California Senate Bill 23 (1999)|Senate Bill 23]] (SB 23). The bill had three provisions: to make illegal the manufacture, importation, sale or offer, or to give or lend any large-capacity magazine as defined as having the capacity to accept more than ten rounds; the addition of a "generic" definition list to the existing Roberti-Roos legislation; and the exemption to allow on and off duty and retired peace officers the use of assault weapons.<ref name=1999SB23Text>{{cite web|last=Perata|title=Addition to Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989 – Enactment of Generic Assault Weapon Ban/Registration Requirements and Ban on Manufacture, Sale or Transfer of "Large-Capacity" Magazines|url=http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/99-00/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sb_23_cfa_19990323_171911_sen_comm.html|publisher=Senate Committee on Public Safety, Senator John Vasconcellos, Chair 1999-2000 Regular Session|accessdate=13 May 2014}}</ref> They are defined in Penal Code §12276.1 and §30515.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/regagunfaqs#1 |title=What is considered an assault weapon under California law? |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |year=2014 |website=oag.ca.gov |publisher=California DOJ |accessdate=May 12, 2014 }}</ref> The bill was passed and went into effect on January 1, 2000.<ref name=OAGSB23>{{cite web|last=Staff|title=Senate Bill 23 Assault Weapon Characteristics|url=http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/regs/genchar2|publisher=California Attorney General|accessdate=24 May 2014}}</ref>

In June 1993, Connecticut became the third U.S. state, after California and New Jersey, to pass an assault weapons ban.<ref name=Johnson930609/> In April 2013, four months after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, the [[Connecticut General Assembly]] passed new restrictions to the state's existing assault weapons ban.<ref name=NYT-AP130404>{{cite news |date=April 4, 2013 |title=Connecticut Governor Signs Gun Measures |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/05/nyregion/connecticut-lawmakers-pass-gun-limits.html |newspaper=New York Times |location= |agency=Associated Press |accessdate=April 10, 2014 }}</ref> The law was challenged, but a federal judge upheld it and ruled it constitutional. Gun owners said they would appeal.<ref name=Pazniokas140130>{{cite news |last=Pazniokas |first=Mark |date=January 30, 2014 |title=Federal judge upholds Sandy Hook gun law |url=http://ctmirror.org/federal-judge-upholds-sandy-hook-gun-law/ |newspaper=Connecticut Mirror |location= |publisher=Connecticut News Project |accessdate=April 10, 2014 }}</ref>

Connecticut prohibits any person from possessing an assault weapon unless the weapon was possessed prior to July 1, 1994, and the possessor:

*Was eligible to apply for a certificate of possession for the assault weapon by July 1, 1994;

*Lawfully possessed the assault weapon prior to October 1, 1993; and

*Is not in violation of Connecticut General Statutes §§ 53-202a to 53-202k (assault weapon regulations), and Connecticut General Statutes § 53-202o (affirmative defense in prosecution for possession of specified assault weapon). It also prohibits any person from distributing, transporting, importing into the state, keeping, offering or exposing for sale, or giving an assault weapon to any person.<ref name=SGLAW-CT/>

Connecticut defines an "assault weapon" as:

*Any "selective-fire" firearm capable of fully automatic, semi-automatic or "burst fire" at the option of the user;

*Any semi-automatic centerfire rifle, regardless of the date produced, that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least one of the following features: 1) A folding or telescoping stock; 2) Any grip of the weapon, including a pistol grip, thumbhole stock, or other stock that would allow an individual to grip the weapon, resulting in any finger on the trigger hand in addition to the trigger finger being directly below any portion of the action of the weapon when firing; 3) A forward pistol grip; 4) A flash suppressor; or 5) A grenade or flare launcher;

*A semi-automatic pistol that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least one of the following features: 1) The ability to accept a detachable ammunition magazine that attaches at some location outside the pistol grip; 2) A threaded barrel capable of accepting a flash suppressor, forward pistol grip or silencer; 3) A shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm without being burned (except a slide that encloses the barrel); or 4) A second hand grip;

*A semi-automatic shotgun that has both of the following features: 1) A folding or telescoping stock; or 2) Any grip of the weapon, including a pistol grip, a thumbhole stock, or any other stock, the use of which would allow an individual to grip the weapon, resulting in any finger on the trigger hand in addition to the trigger finger being directly below any portion of the action of the weapon when firing;

*A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has: 1) a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds of ammunition; or 2) an overall length of less than 30 inches;

*A semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that has the ability to accept more than 10 rounds of ammunition;

*A semiautomatic shotgun that can accept a detachable magazine; or

*A shotgun with a revolving cylinder.<ref name=SGLAW-CT/>

Connecticut also bans listed makes and models of semiautomatic firearms and copies of those firearms. [[Grandfather clause]]s and other exceptions apply, depending.<ref name=SGLAW-CT/>

{{See also|Gun laws in Hawaii}}

Hawaiian law bans the manufacture, possession, sale or other transfer of what it defines as assault [[pistol]]s. Hawaii defines an "assault pistol" as a semiautomatic handgun that accepts a detachable magazine and that has two or more of:

*An ammunition [[Magazine (firearms)|magazine]] that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip;

*A threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash [[suppressor]], forward hand grip, or silencer;

*A [[Barrel shroud|shroud]] that is attached to or partially or completely encircles the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the second hand without being burned;

*A manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded;

*A [[Centerfire ammunition|centerfire]] pistol with an overall length of 12 inches or more; or

*A semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm.<ref name=SGLAW-HI/>

In tandem with the assault pistol ban is a law that bans the manufacture, possession, sale or other transfer of detachable ammunition magazines with capacities greater than 10 rounds that are capable of use with a pistol.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/large-capacity-ammunition-magazines-in-hawaii/ |title=Large Capacity Ammunition Magazines in Hawaii |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=January 2, 2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref>

Hawaii was one of seven U.S. states to have an assault weapons ban in place prior to the September 2004 sunset of the now defunct federal Assault Weapons Ban of 1994.<ref name=Koerner040916/>

{{See also|Gun laws in Maryland}}

Maryland law prohibits the possession, sale, transfer, purchase, receipt, or transportation into the state of assault weapons defined as assault pistols and assault long guns. Maryland's definition of an "assault long gun" includes a list of 45 specific firearms or their copies, with certain variations. Maryland's definition of an "assault pistol" includes a list of 15 specific firearms or their copies, with certain variations. Maryland also defines an assault weapon "copycat weapon" as:

*A semiautomatic centerfire rifle that can accept a detachable magazine and has any two of the following: a folding stock; a grenade or flare launcher; or a flash suppressor;

*A semiauto centerfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds;

*A semiauto centerfire rifle that has an overall length of less than 29 inches;

*A semiauto pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds;

*A semiauto shotgun that has a folding stock; or

*A shotgun with a revolving cylinder.<ref name=SGLAW-MD/>

In tandem with the assault weapons ban is a law that bans the manufacture, possession, sale or other transfer of detachable magazines with capacities greater than 20 rounds.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/large-capacity-ammunition-magazines-in-maryland/ |title=Large Capacity Ammunition Magazines in Maryland |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=January 2, 2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref>

{{See also|Gun laws in Massachusetts}}

Massachusetts law bans the sale, transfer, or possession of assault weapons not otherwise lawfully possessed on September 13, 1994. Massachusetts defines "assault weapon" by the definition of "semiautomatic assault weapon" in the federal assault weapons ban of 1994. That definition included:

*A list of firearms by name and copies of those firearms;

*Semi-automatic rifles and pistols capable of accepting a detachable magazine and having at least two specified characteristics; and

*Semi-automatic shotguns having at least two specified characteristics.<ref name=SGLAW-MA/>

In tandem with the assault weapons ban is a law that bans the sale, transfer, or possession of a large capacity feeding device unless such device was lawfully possessed on September 13, 1994. The definition of "large capacity feeding device" included: a fixed or detachable magazine, box, drum, feed strip or similar device capable of accepting, or that can be readily converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition or more than 5 shotgun shells; or a large capacity ammunition feeding device as defined in the federal assault weapons ban of 1994.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/large-capacity-ammunition-magazines-in-massachusetts/ |title=Large Capacity Ammunition Magazines in Massachusetts |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=January 2, 2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref>

In May 1990, New Jersey became the second state in the U.S. to pass an assault weapons ban, after California. At the time, it was the toughest assault weapons ban in the nation.<ref name=DePalma900518/> [[AR-15]] platform, [[semi-automatic rifle]]s are illegal in New Jersey, and owning and publicly carrying other guns require separate licensing processes.<ref name=Record120721>{{cite news |last1=Linhorst |first1=Michael |last2=Connor |first2=Erinn |last3=Fujimori |first3=Sachi |date=July 21, 2012 |title=N.J. law bans assault rifles, restricts other weapons |url=http://www.northjersey.com/news/n-j-law-bans-assault-rifles-restricts-other-weapons-1.391273 |newspaper=The Record |location= |publisher=North Jersey Media Group |accessdate=April 21, 2014 }}</ref>

{{See also|Gun laws in New York}}

New York law bans the manufacture, transport, disposal or possession an assault weapon in the state. It defines an "assault weapon" as:

*A semi-automatic rifle or pistol able to accept a detachable magazine and that has at least one of from a list of characteristics;

*A semi-automatic shotgun that has at least one from a list of characteristics; or

*A revolving cylinder shotgun.<ref name=SGLAW-NY/>

In tandem with the assault weapons ban is a law that bans the manufacture, transport, disposal or possession of a "large capacity ammunition feeding device," defined as: "a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that: 1) has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than ten rounds of ammunition; 2) contains more than seven rounds of ammunition; or 3) is obtained after January 15, 2013 and has a capacity of, or can be readily restored or converted to accept more than seven rounds of ammunition."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/large-capacity-ammunition-magazines-in-new-york/ |title=Large Capacity Ammunition Magazines in New York |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=January 2, 2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref>

===County and municipal bans===

Some local governments have laws that ban or restrict the possession of assault weapons.

====District of Columbia====

A [[Washington, D.C.]] law banning the possession of assault weapons was upheld by a federal appeals court in 2011.<ref>Duggan, Paul (October 4, 2011). [http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/federal-appeals-court-panel-rules-in-favor-of-dc-gun-law/2011/10/04/gIQAWekxLL_story.html "Federal Appeals Court Panel Rules in Favor of D.C. Gun Law"], ''Washington Post''. Retrieved May 24, 2014.</ref>

====Illinois====

The law that set up Illinois' concealed carry system in 2013 also established state preemption for certain areas of gun law, including restrictions on assault weapons. Laws passed before July 20, 2013 are [[grandfathered]] in, and a number of local governments in the Chicago area have laws that either prohibit or regulate the possession of firearms that they define as assault weapons.<ref>McCoppin, Robert (July 21, 2013). [http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-07-21/news/ct-met-assault-weapons-bans-0721-20130721_1_assault-weapon-gun-owners-restrictive-gun-laws "Some Suburbs Pass Assault Weapon Restrictions, Others Dissuaded by Gun Owners"], ''Chicago Tribune''. Retrieved May 18, 2014.</ref> These include the city of [[Chicago]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://directives.chicagopolice.org/directives-mobile/data/a7a57bf0-12dc41eb-af712-dc46-923815c7c3b2a231.html |title=City of Chicago Regulation Defining “Assault Weapon” |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |year=2013 |website=chicagopolice.org |publisher=Chicago Police Department |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref> and [[Cook County, Illinois|Cook County]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://library.municode.com/HTML/13805/level4/PTIGEOR_CH54LIPEMIBURE_ARTIIIDEWEDE_DIV4BLHOASWEBA.html |title=Division 4. Blair Holt Assault Weapons Ban |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |year=2013 |website=municode.com |publisher=Municipal Code Corporation |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}</ref>

====Indiana====

In March 1989 the Northwest Indiana cities of [[Gary, Indiana|Gary]] and [[East Chicago]] city councils passed ordinances prohibiting both sale and possession of assault weapons. Gary City Councilman [[Vernon G. Smith]] (D-4th) sponsored the ordinance making it a crime to possess or sell assault-type weapons. <ref name=1990PostTrib>{{cite news|last=Staff|title=Assault Weapon Sales Recoil Gary, East Chicago Outlawed Them; None Turned In to Police|url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1N1-10852F5F4AD9C3E0.html|accessdate=19 May 2014|newspaper=Post-Tribune (IN) {{Subscription required|via=[[HighBeam Research]]}}|date=January 15, 1990}}</ref>

====Massachusetts====

[[Boston]] has a law prohibiting the possession or transfer of assault weapons without a license from the Boston Police Commissioner.<ref>[http://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/state-laws/massachusetts.aspx "State Gun Laws: Massachusetts"], NRA-ILA. Retrieved May 23, 2014.</ref>

==Expired and inactive==

===Federal Assault Weapons Ban===

{{Main|Federal Assault Weapons Ban}}

The assault weapons ban tried to address public concern about mass shootings while limiting the impact on recreational firearms use.<ref name="Roth-Koper ImpactsBrief1999">{{cite journal |last=Roth |first=Jeffrey A. |author2=Christopher S. Koper |title=Impacts of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban |url=https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/173405.pdf |journal=National Institute of Justice Research in Brief |issue=NCJ 173405 |date=March 1999 }}</ref>{{rp|1–2}}

In November 1993, the ban passed the [[U.S. Senate]], although its author, [[Dianne Feinstein]], D-CA, and other advocates said that it was a weakened version of the original proposal.<ref name="Bunting 931109">{{cite news |title=Feinstein Faces Fight for Diluted Gun Bill |first=Glenn F. |last=Bunting |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1993-11-09/news/mn-54844_1_assault-weapon |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |date=November 9, 1993 }}</ref> In January 1994, [[Josh Sugarmann]], executive director of the [[Violence Policy Center]], said handguns and assault weapons should be banned.<ref name="Sugarmann MotherJones9401">{{cite journal |last=Sugarmann |first=Josh |date=January 1994 |title=Reverse FIRE: The Brady Bill won't break the sick hold guns have on America. It's time for tougher measures. |publisher=Mother Jones |url=http://www.motherjones.com/politics/1994/01/reverse-fire }}</ref> In May of that year, former presidents [[Gerald ford|Gerald R. Ford]], [[Jimmy carter|Jimmy Carter]], and [[Ronald reagan|Ronald Reagan]], wrote to the [[United States House of Representatives|U.S. House of Representatives]] in support of banning "semi-automatic assault guns." They cited a 1993 CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll that found 77 percent of Americans supported a ban on the manufacture, sale, and possession of such weapons.<ref name="Eaton 940505">{{cite news |title=Ford, Carter, Reagan Push for Gun Ban |first=William J. |last=Eaton |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1994-05-05/news/mn-54185_1_assault-weapons-ban/2 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |date=May 5, 1994 }}</ref> Rep. [[Jack Brooks (politician)|Jack Brooks]], D-TX, then chair of the House Judiciary Committee, tried to remove the ban from the crime bill but failed.<ref name="Seelye 940728">{{cite news |title=Assault Weapons Ban Allowed To Stay in Anti-crime Measure |first=Katharine Q. |last=Seelye |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1994/07/28/us/assault-weapons-ban-allowed-to-stay-in-anti-crime-measure.html |newspaper=The New York Times |date=July 28, 1994 }}</ref>

The [[Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act]], commonly called the Federal Assault Weapons Ban (AWB 1994), was enacted in September 1994. Its two primary provisions banned: semi-automatic firearms that had two "military-style" features, and large-capacity magazines (LCMs, also called high-capacity magazines).<ref name=BBY2014ChAW>{{cite book |last=Roman |first=John K. |year=2014 |chapter=Special Report: Society: Assault Weapons |chapterurl=http://books.google.com/books?id=LccRAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA334#v=onepage&q&f=false |title=Britannica Book of the Year 2014 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=LccRAwAAQBAJ |publisher=Encyclopaedia Britannica |isbn=978-1-62513-171-3 |page=335 }}</ref> The ban only applied to weapons and magazines manufactured after the law's enactment; possession and transfer of weapons and magazines legally owned before enactment was not restricted. Critics of the assault weapon definition said that, on civilian guns, military features were largely cosmetic.<ref name=BBY2014p335q>{{cite book |last=Roman |first=John K. |year=2014 |chapter=Special Report: Society: Assault Weapons |chapterurl=http://books.google.com/books?id=LccRAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA334#v=onepage&q&f=false |title=Britannica Book of the Year 2014 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=LccRAwAAQBAJ |publisher=Encyclopaedia Britannica |isbn=978-1-62513-171-3 |page=335 |quote=The 1994 Assault Weapons Ban .... defined an AW as a semiautomatic that had two "military-style" features .... Critics contended that it was [LCMs] that needed to be controlled and that the military features were mainly cosmetic for civilian guns. }}</ref>

The ban, including the ban on high-capacity magazines, became defunct (expired) in September 2004 per a 10-year [[sunset provision]]. Proposals in 2003, 2005, 2007, and 2008 to reauthorize or reinstitute the ban were not passed.

==Proposed and failed==

==={{anchor|California Assembly Bill 1509 (1985)}}1985 - California===

In March 1985, state Assemblyman [[Art Agnos]] (D-San Francisco) introduced Assembly Bill 1509 which would prohibit the sale of firearms that can be converted to automatic weapons or machine guns.<ref name=1985LATimesAB1509>{{cite web|last=Gillam|first=Jerry|title=Sacramento File|url=http://articles.latimes.com/1985-03-07/news/mn-34500_1_tax-amnesty-program|publisher=Los Angeles Times|accessdate=18 May 2014}}</ref> The proposed legislation would have made it illegal to manufacture, import, sell, transport or transfer an "assault firearm" or their ammunition magazines. Anyone who owned such a firearm once the bill became law could keep them. Anyone wishing to purchase this type of firearm would be required to obtain a special permit from the attorney general similar to those issued for machine guns. At the time the bill was introduced, the only people with such permits were film makers and weapons designers.<ref name=LATimes-Ingram>{{cite news |last=Ingram |first=Carl |title=Restricting of Assault-Type Guns Okd by Assembly Unit |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1985-04-09/news/mn-27984_1_machine-guns |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |date=April 9, 1985}}</ref>

The bill was introduced after a [[San Ysidro McDonald's massacre|1984 shooting incident]] at a [[McDonalds]] restaurant in San Ysidro, CA where a semi-automatic version of machine gun was used.<ref name=LATimes-Ingram/> This bill would have been in addition to existing laws that made possession of machine guns and "semi-automatic to automatic" conversion kits serious felonies in California.<ref name=G&A1985>{{cite journal|title=California: gun control's primary target.|journal=Guns & Ammo Magazine|date=November 1, 1985}}</ref>

The following month, the bill passed through the Ways and Means Committee<ref name=G&A1985/> and was approved by the Assembly Public Safety Committee with the support of law enforcement officials although it was opposed by the [[National Rifle Association]].<ref name=LATimes-Ingram/> In the same session, the committee endorsed an anti-street gang measure by Assemblywoman [[Maxine Waters]] (D-Los Angeles) that would have allowed authorities to charge a minor with a [[felony]] for possessing a concealable weapon without parental consent. At the time the crime was a [[misdemeanor]]. The bill was sponsored by the [[Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors]] and gave prosecutors and judges the ability to decide whether a minor should be charged with a misdemeanor or a felony punishable by up to three years in prison.<ref name=LATimes-Ingram/>

The original text of AB 1509 included [[.22 caliber]] [[rimfire ammunition|rimfire]] firearms, but was changed to include the following specific types of ammunition: [[9mm]], [[.45 caliber]], [[.308 caliber]], [[.380 caliber]], [[.223 caliber]] or [[5.56mm NATO]] cartridges.<ref name=G&A1985/>

When AB1509 came for a vote for the first time before the California Assembly 45 assemblymen voted against it and was later designated as "inactive".<ref name=1985AssemblyBillIndex>{{cite journal|last=Driscoll|first=James D.|title=Index to Journal of the Assembly|journal=Journal of the Assembly|date=December 6, 1985 - November 30, 1986|volume=1985-1986|page=236|url=http://192.234.213.35/clerkarchive/archive/DailyJournal/1985/volumes/85607ir.pdf|accessdate=18 May 2014}}</ref>

===2012 - California===

In May 2012, state Senator [[Leland Yee]] (D-San Francisco) together with fellow Senator [[Kevin de León]] introduced Senate Bill 249 (SB 249) which became known as the "[[bullet button]]" bill.<ref name=CBS5120520>{{cite news |url=http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2012/05/20/cbs-5-story-inspires-new-legislation-to-ban-bullet-button/ |title=CBS 5 Report Inspires New Legislation To Ban 'Bullet Button' |date=May 20, 2012 |location=Sacramento, California |publisher=CBS Local Media}}</ref> The bill was an attempt to close a loophole in one of the state's gun control laws.<ref name=2012YeePR>{{cite web |url=http://sd08.senate.ca.gov/news/2012-05-21-yee-introduces-bill-close-loophole-assault-weapon-law |title=Yee Introduces Bill to Close Loophole in Assault Weapon Law |date=May 21, 2012}}</ref> At the time it was illegal for manufacturers to sell certain guns with detachable magazines or the capacity that allows for repeat firing. Some manufacturers had been selling firearms with tools, or conversion kits, that allowed it to be reloaded quickly. The purpose of SB 249 was to ban such devices, including "bullet buttons."<ref name=2012HuffAB249>{{cite web |last=Miles |first=Kathleen |date=August 7, 2012 |title=SB 249, CA Sen. Leland Yee's Gun Control Bill, Seeks To Slow Bullet Reloading, Infuriates Gun Activists |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/07/sb-249-ca-sen-leland-yee-gun-control-bill_n_1752190.html |publisher=Huffington Post |accessdate=May 18, 2014}}</ref> Yee stated, "Absent this bill, California's assault weapon ban is significantly weakened. For the safety of the general public, we must close this loophole."<ref name=2012YeePR/> The bill made its way through the Public Safety Committee and others, but ultimately died without further action in November of 2012.<ref name=2012SB249Record>{{cite web |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=SB-249 Assault weapons.(2011-2012): Votes |url=http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120SB249&search_keywords= |publisher=California Legislature |accessdate=May 18, 2014}}</ref>

On December 18, four days after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting, Senator Yee introduced Senate Bill 47 (SB 47) to modify the existing California assault weapons law.<ref name=2012SB47>{{cite web |author=Leland Yee |title=SB 47: Assault Weapons |url=http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB47 |publisher=California Legislature |accessdate=May 18, 2014}}</ref> The modification would have added to the prohibited list any firearm that has a fixed magazine in addition to the assault weapons that are equipped with detachable magazine.<ref name=2012SB47TCsite>{{cite web |last=Staff |title=SB47 (Yee) |url=http://totalcapitol.com/?bill_id=201320140SB47 |publisher=TotalCapitol.com |accessdate=May 18, 2014}}</ref> The bill was suspended by the Appropriations Committee in August 2013.<ref name=2012SB47/>

===2013 - Federal===

{{Main|Assault Weapons Ban of 2013}}

Efforts to pass a new federal assault weapons ban were renewed on December 14, 2012, after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut<ref name=Barron121215>{{cite news |last=Barron |first=James |date=December 15, 2012 |title=Children Were All Shot Multiple Times With a Semiautomatic, Officials Say |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/16/nyregion/gunman-kills-20-children-at-school-in-connecticut-28-dead-in-all.html |newspaper=New York Times |location= |publisher=New York Times Company |accessdate=April 12, 2014 }}</ref><ref name=Levy121221>{{cite news |last=Levy |first=Gabrielle |date=December 21, 2012 |title=Obama responds to gun violence petition |url=http://www.upi.com/blog/2012/12/21/Obama-responds-to-gun-violence-petition/1021356100902/ |newspaper= |location= |publisher=United Press International |type=blog |accessdate=May 26, 2014 }}</ref><ref name=Steinhauer130124/> - the deadliest primary or secondary [[school shooting]] in U.S. history.<ref name=Effron121214>{{cite news |title=Mass School Shootings: A History |author=Effron, Lauren |url=http://abcnews.go.com/US/mass-school-shootings-history/story?id=17975571 |publisher=ABC News |date=December 14, 2012 |accessdate=April 13, 2014}}</ref> On January 24, 2013, Dianne Feinstein introduced {{USBill|113|S.|150}}, the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 (AWB 2013), in the [[U.S. Senate]].<ref name=CSPAN130124/> The bill was similar to the 1994 federal ban, but differed in that it used a one-feature test for a firearm to qualify as an assault weapon rather than the two-feature test of the 1994 ban.<ref name=USAToday130124/> On April 17, 2013, AWB 2013 failed on a Senate vote of 60 to 40.<ref name=Simon130417/>

{{Reflist|30em}}

==Further reading==

*{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/search-gun-law-by-state/ |title=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence: Search by State Gun Law |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |accessdate=April 27, 2014 }}

*{{cite web |url=http://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/state-laws.aspx |title=NRA-ILA: State Gun Laws |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=2013 |website=nraila.org |publisher=National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action |accessdate=April 27, 2014 }}

*{{cite news |last=Olinger |first=David |date=April 19, 2000 |title=Massacre energizes gun debate - but not lawmakers |url=http://extras.denverpost.com/news/col0419g.htm |newspaper=Denver Post |location=Denver, Colorado |publisher= |accessdate=May 27, 2014 }}

*{{cite news |last=Plumer |first=Brad |date=December 17, 2012 |title=Everything you need to know about the assault weapons ban, in one post |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/12/17/everything-you-need-to-know-about-banning-assault-weapons-in-one-post/ |type=blog |newspaper=Washington Post |location=Washington, D.C. |publisher= |accessdate=April 27, 2014 }}

*{{cite web |url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1961494/Assault-Weapons-Year-In-Review-2013 |title=Assault Weapons: Year In Review 2013 |last=Roman |first=John K. |date=December 27, 2013 |website=britannica.com |publisher=Encyclopedia Britannica |accessdate=April 28, 2014 }}