User talk:Org.aidepikiw: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:25, 2 May 2016

Anita Sarkeesian Talk Page

Hi there, I noticed you keep blanking a comment of mine (along with those of a couple other editors). The comment seems pretty harmless and respectful to me, but if it bothers you, just let me know and I'll remove it myself. Thanks. Dumuzid (talk) 10:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 12:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I intend to impose editing sanctions to prevent further disruption when your block expires. Since that involves a fair amount of paperwork, I will do that when time is available. In the meantime you're blocked for a week for edit-warring to reinsert a disruptive and prejudiced heading on the talkpage of a biography, which you are abusing as a soapbox to express a dislike of the subject. Acroterion (talk) 12:05, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are now subject to the standard GamerGate topic-ban--this means that you are indefinitely topic-banned from the subjects of: (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned for your disruptive editing at pages related to Anita Sarkeesian.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Zad68 12:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 :Furthermore, I intend to impose editing sanctions to prevent further disruption when your block expires. Since that involves a fair amount of paperwork, I will do that when time is available. In the meantime you're blocked for a week for edit-warring to reinsert a disruptive and prejudiced heading on the talkpage of a biography, which you are abusing as a soapbox to express a dislike of the subject. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></font>''' 12:05, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
+==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction==
+{{Ivmbox
+|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg
+|imagesize=50px
+|1=The following sanction now applies to you:
+{{Talkquote|1=You are now subject to the standard GamerGate topic-ban--this means that you are indefinitely [[WP:TBAN|topic-banned]] from the subjects of: (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed.}}
+You have been sanctioned for your disruptive editing at pages related to [[Anita Sarkeesian]].
+This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] under the authority of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]]'s decision at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate#Final decision]] and, if applicable, the procedure described at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]. This sanction has been recorded in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/2016|log of sanctions]]. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banning policy]] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
+You may appeal this sanction using the process described [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|here]]. I recommend that you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard.&nbsp;Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> <code>[[User:Zad68|<span style="color:#D2691E">'''Zad'''</span>]][[User_Talk:Zad68|<span style="color:#206060">''68''</span>]]</code> 12:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
+}}