Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Bot clerking: archiving (1 denied) (0 open requests remaining) |
Bot clerking: archiving (1 denied) (0 open requests remaining) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::{{reply to|Fastily}} Regarding the first one, I should have placed a {{tl|uw-vandalism2}} (or level 1) on their user page looking back at it. In the moment though I was a bit tired and under the impression that the person who did the edit would surely know it would get reverted so I didn't think to warn them. Second one I could have done better too. Fourth one was pretty much decision fatigue (appears they did not know they were editing within a template, I tried looking for an appropriate message to leave on their talk page but couldn't find one so I just gave up).</br>Situations like the first two don't commonly occur, I know how I would deal with them now but I must have slipped up somehow.</br>But yeah I'll be sure to warn others when I can, and if I don't know how I could warn them, I would simply not to revert them to begin with and let another person deal with it. [[User:Satricious|Satricious]] ([[User talk:Satricious|talk]]) 04:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC) |
::{{reply to|Fastily}} Regarding the first one, I should have placed a {{tl|uw-vandalism2}} (or level 1) on their user page looking back at it. In the moment though I was a bit tired and under the impression that the person who did the edit would surely know it would get reverted so I didn't think to warn them. Second one I could have done better too. Fourth one was pretty much decision fatigue (appears they did not know they were editing within a template, I tried looking for an appropriate message to leave on their talk page but couldn't find one so I just gave up).</br>Situations like the first two don't commonly occur, I know how I would deal with them now but I must have slipped up somehow.</br>But yeah I'll be sure to warn others when I can, and if I don't know how I could warn them, I would simply not to revert them to begin with and let another person deal with it. [[User:Satricious|Satricious]] ([[User talk:Satricious|talk]]) 04:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
:::Thanks for confirming. Admins use warnings to track/block disruptive users, so it's very important to leave them for every revert you make. {{Done}} -[[User talk:Fastily|<span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';color:Indigo;font-weight:bold;"><span style="font-size:120%;">F</span><span style="font-size:90%;">ASTILY</span></span>]] 22:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC) |
:::Thanks for confirming. Admins use warnings to track/block disruptive users, so it's very important to leave them for every revert you make. {{Done}} -[[User talk:Fastily|<span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';color:Indigo;font-weight:bold;"><span style="font-size:120%;">F</span><span style="font-size:90%;">ASTILY</span></span>]] 22:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
====[[User:Endrabcwizart]]==== |
|||
*{{rfplinks|1=Endrabcwizart}} |
|||
Hello |
|||
I am Wikipedia Contributer from Nepal. I made 180+ main space edits. I write article about Nepali Lagend/famous people, Nepali Calture, and others. |
|||
So, I would like to requiest rollback rights to make it easier for me to edit multiple vandalized edits done by a user. Thanks for reading [[User:Endrabcwizart|Endrabcwizart]] ([[User talk:Endrabcwizart|talk]]) 14:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:{{comment|Automated comment}} This user has <!-- mb-mainSpaceCount -->64<!-- mb-mainSpaceCount-end --> edits in the [[WP:MAINSPACE|mainspace]]. <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <b>[[User:MusikBot|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikBot</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 14:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::how can I See my mainspace edits [[User:Endrabcwizart|Endrabcwizart]] ([[User talk:Endrabcwizart|talk]]) 09:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{ping|Endrabcwizart}} you can check your edit count [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/Endrabcwizart here]. 180+ is the number of your ''total'' edits, including user pages, talk pages, etc. Typically, only mainspace edits are counted when considering others for advanced permissions. ''[[User:Liamyangll|Liamyangll]]'' ([[User talk:Liamyangll|talk to me!]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liamyangll|My contribs!]]) 10:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC) {{NACC}} {{tpw|v|safe=yes}} |
|||
::::Thanks. I get my answer . [[User:Endrabcwizart|Endrabcwizart]] ([[User talk:Endrabcwizart|talk]]) 14:23, 13 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:{{comment}} This user has no anti vandalism work. @[[User:Endrabcwizart|Endrabcwizart]] Please spend some time reverting vandalism, and then you are welcome to request for the permission here again. You may user [[WP:Twinkle]] and [[WP:Redwarn]] to revert vandalism. Also you can watch out for vandalism using [[Special:RecentChanges]]. Thanks and regards. [[User:Itcouldbepossible|<b style="background:linear-gradient(45deg,#f05,#b49);border:2px solid #000;padding:2px;color:#ef4;">Itcouldbepossible</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Itcouldbepossible|Talk]]</sup> 16:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::{{not done}}. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only 64 edits to the [[Wikipedia:What is an article%3F#Namespace|mainspace]], I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at [[Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit|WP:CVU]], and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the [[Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy|Counter Vandalism Academy]] to learn more. Lack of edits reverting vandalism and fairly recent warnings also don't help.--[[User:Slon02|Slon02]] ([[User talk:Slon02|talk]]) 22:38, 12 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
====[[User:Fehufanga]]==== |
====[[User:Fehufanga]]==== |
||
Revision as of 14:30, 16 February 2022
Rollback
User:Satricious
- Satricious (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like rollback rights to make it easier for me to revert multiple vandalized edits done by a single user. Prior to this I reverted manually which was pretty time consuming, but I recently tried out a few tools (Twinkle and RW), and while I do like them, they do take a while to load up and I'd much prefer to get things done in a single click.
I would be using this feature to revert clear vandalism (eg. spam, advertising, disruptive). If it's subtle or unintentional (eg. good faith edits) I would probably resort to leaving a handwritten message so as to not confuse the user.
I would also be interested in exploring other tools that require rollback rights to use. (such as Huggle)
TLDR: I patrol new recent changes and doublecheck. Want rollback to make reverting obvious vandalism easier. Also looking to explore Huggle. Satricious (talk) 06:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- I reviewed your recent contributions, and noticed that you're not always warning editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4). Could you please comment on that? -FASTILY 02:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Fastily: Regarding the first one, I should have placed a {{uw-vandalism2}} (or level 1) on their user page looking back at it. In the moment though I was a bit tired and under the impression that the person who did the edit would surely know it would get reverted so I didn't think to warn them. Second one I could have done better too. Fourth one was pretty much decision fatigue (appears they did not know they were editing within a template, I tried looking for an appropriate message to leave on their talk page but couldn't find one so I just gave up).
Situations like the first two don't commonly occur, I know how I would deal with them now but I must have slipped up somehow.
But yeah I'll be sure to warn others when I can, and if I don't know how I could warn them, I would simply not to revert them to begin with and let another person deal with it. Satricious (talk) 04:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)- Thanks for confirming. Admins use warnings to track/block disruptive users, so it's very important to leave them for every revert you make.
Done -FASTILY 22:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for confirming. Admins use warnings to track/block disruptive users, so it's very important to leave them for every revert you make.
- @Fastily: Regarding the first one, I should have placed a {{uw-vandalism2}} (or level 1) on their user page looking back at it. In the moment though I was a bit tired and under the impression that the person who did the edit would surely know it would get reverted so I didn't think to warn them. Second one I could have done better too. Fourth one was pretty much decision fatigue (appears they did not know they were editing within a template, I tried looking for an appropriate message to leave on their talk page but couldn't find one so I just gave up).
User:Fehufanga
- Fehufanga (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to request rollback permissions to help me with anti-vandalism tasks. Sometimes I find myself having to revert multiple edits quickly and rollback will be a useful tool for me. In addition, I am currently participating in the CVUA. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 03:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- I reviewed your recent contributions, and noticed that you're not always warning editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4). Could you please comment on that? -FASTILY 22:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Fastily: Sure. The first edit is related to an (at that time) unconfirmed sports transaction. At that time, I couldn't find the appropriate warning to give (which in this case should have been a uw-sportstrans), and I quickly moved on to another edit. The remaining three are caused by me closing a tab too early while the RedWarn tool is in the middle of warning a user. In the future, I will make sure that I warn users appropriately. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 23:43, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for confirming. Admins use warnings to track/block disruptive users, so it's very important to leave them for every revert you make. Done -FASTILY 22:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for confirming. Admins use warnings to track/block disruptive users, so it's very important to leave them for every revert you make.
- @Fastily: Sure. The first edit is related to an (at that time) unconfirmed sports transaction. At that time, I couldn't find the appropriate warning to give (which in this case should have been a uw-sportstrans), and I quickly moved on to another edit. The remaining three are caused by me closing a tab too early while the RedWarn tool is in the middle of warning a user. In the future, I will make sure that I warn users appropriately. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 23:43, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
User:Basedch
- Basedch (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I usually patrol pages and check if there is vandalism, reverting vandalism sometimes easy when the vandal edits are 1 or 2, but it becomes very hard and take too much time to revert vandalism one by one when there is too much edits, with rollback feature I can revert the vandalism easily. Basedch (talk) 14:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Not done due to today's EW block --Guerillero Parlez Moi 20:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)