Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audio Video Standard: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:46, 13 June 2022

Audio Video Standard

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have serious concerns about WP:GNG here. Nothing in the text suggests this is notable; my BEFORE revealed only a few conference papers using this term, something like 4, with 2 written by the same group of authors. This is not a hoax, but it doesn't appear to be a notable concept. Chinese wiki article is of no help, being shorter and sporting just a single footnote. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and China. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Agreed that the "standard" has a grandiose title, given that it seems like a niche of usage in China. However, the effort has lasted quite some time, and appears to have a bit of a revival with on-line 8K formats. Article of course needs work to reduce dated promotion. We do need more coverage of non-USA topics in the technical Wikipedia articles, although they need the same notability requirements of course. The downside of something Chinese and so old is that online sources might be hard to find. W Nowicki (talk) 18:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 :{{la|1=Audio Video Standard}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audio Video Standard|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 June 13#{{anchorencode:Audio Video Standard}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1092931347/cur|edits since nomination]])
 :({{Find sources AFD|title=Audio Video Standard}})
-I have serious concerns about [[WP:GNG]] here. Nothing in the text suggests this is notable; my BEFORE revelead only a few conference papers using this term, something like 4, with 2 written by the same group of authors. This is not a hoax, but it doesn't appear to be a notable concept. Chinese wiki article is of no help, being shorter and sporting just a single footnote. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 14:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
+I have serious concerns about [[WP:GNG]] here. Nothing in the text suggests this is notable; my BEFORE  only a few conference papers using this term, something like 4, with 2 written by the same group of authors. This is not a hoax, but it doesn't appear to be a notable concept. Chinese wiki article is of no help, being shorter and sporting just a single footnote. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 14:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|Computing]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/China|China]]. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 14:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)</small>
+* Weak '''keep'''. Agreed that the "standard" has a grandiose title, given that it seems like a niche of usage in China. However, the effort has lasted quite some time, and appears to have a bit of a revival with on-line 8K formats.  Article of course needs work to reduce dated promotion. We do need more coverage of non-USA topics in the technical Wikipedia articles, although they need the same notability requirements of course. The downside of something Chinese and so old is that online sources might be hard to find. [[User:W Nowicki|W Nowicki]] ([[User talk:W Nowicki|talk]]) 18:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)