Jump to content

User:8UB3RG1N3/Penperfectionism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 13: Line 13:
However, near-perfection is subjective. I believe you can work to your standard, as Wikipedia is a public encyclopedia that anyone can use to meet their needs.
However, near-perfection is subjective. I believe you can work to your standard, as Wikipedia is a public encyclopedia that anyone can use to meet their needs.


If you agree with me, sign your name below:
you :

{{Cot|Penperfectionists}}
{{columns-list
}}- {{User|8UB3RG1N3}}{{cob}}

Latest revision as of 16:25, 10 June 2024

Hello, Wikipedians. I'm writing this essay to talk about my beliefs.

I joined Wikipedia on a whim, thinking it'd help me study better. But now, I understand that Wikipedia is a complex machine, requiring millions of users to help. To the untrained (or "unedited," if you will) eye, Wikipedia articles seem like a quick thing, something you write and forget about. But in reality, articles are imperfect. They are flawed. And they will NEVER be perfect. This means that Wikipedia will never be perfect. That's also because new information will always be flooding in.

I call this belief penperfectionism. Pen- as in the Neo-Classical prefix meaning "almost," and perfectionism as in believing that everything must be perfect.

Penperfectionism is the belief that Wikipedia will never be perfect and that we should get as close to perfection as possible. It is also the belief that we must work as hard as possible to achieve this goal.

I rank penperfectionism somewhere between completionism and eventuality.

However, near-perfection is subjective. I believe you can work to your standard, as Wikipedia is a public encyclopedia that anyone can use to meet their needs.

Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk :3