Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaidam Health: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
D |
→Vaidam Health: Reply |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|Companies]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Travel and tourism|Travel and tourism]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Medicine|Medicine]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Haryana|Haryana]]. '''[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">WC</span>''<span style="color:#999933">Quidditch</span>'']]''' [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style="color:#999933">✎</span>]] 22:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|Companies]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Travel and tourism|Travel and tourism]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Medicine|Medicine]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Haryana|Haryana]]. '''[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">WC</span>''<span style="color:#999933">Quidditch</span>'']]''' [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style="color:#999933">✎</span>]] 22:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' - Great source assessment. I did a spot check of the current sourcing and also a quick search online. Cannot find anything that meets [[WP:ORGCRIT]]. Plenty of mentions, churnalism, or otherwise unreliable sourcing. Nothing that would show CORPDEPTH. --[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 01:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - Great source assessment. I did a spot check of the current sourcing and also a quick search online. Cannot find anything that meets [[WP:ORGCRIT]]. Plenty of mentions, churnalism, or otherwise unreliable sourcing. Nothing that would show CORPDEPTH. --[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 01:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
:'''delete:''' made to evade a salting, fails multiple guidelines, cites various strange sources. if that's not grounds for deletion i don't know what is. [[User:8UB3RG1N3|Noelle!!!]] <small>([[User talk:8UB3RG1N3|summon a demon]] or [[User:8UB3RG1N3/Penperfectionism|read smth]])</small> 16:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:31, 10 June 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vaidam Health (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Created evading a salting of Vaidam. Sources:
- No mention of the topic I can find
- A student's final exam is not a reliable source
- Consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing WP:ORGIND
- Not in-depth enough to meet WP:CORPDEPTH
- Interview - consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing WP:ORGIND
- Interview - consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing WP:ORGIND
- This reads like a press release, despite the lack of explicit language admitting to such, and has no listed author so I'm not convinced it's reliable.
- Consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing WP:ORGIND
- This looks promising, but I can't access it.
- No mention of the topic I can find
- WP:TOI should not be used to establish notability for companies, and in any event except for the first paragraph which doesn't satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH this consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing WP:ORGIND
- Does not discuss the topic in sufficient depth to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH
- Does not discuss the topic in sufficient depth to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH and given the tone and the lack of a listed author I'm not convinced it's reliable either.
- The article itself is both from the Times and India and does not discuss the topic in sufficient depth to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. The case study itself is more interesting, but does that make a reliable source?
- Duplicate of source 9
- Primary source
So there may be a vague glimmer of merit smothered under the REFBOMB, but not enough to let this title-gaming slip by without review. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Travel and tourism, Medicine, and Haryana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Great source assessment. I did a spot check of the current sourcing and also a quick search online. Cannot find anything that meets WP:ORGCRIT. Plenty of mentions, churnalism, or otherwise unreliable sourcing. Nothing that would show CORPDEPTH. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- delete: made to evade a salting, fails multiple guidelines, cites various strange sources. if that's not grounds for deletion i don't know what is. Noelle!!! (summon a demon or read smth) 16:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)