Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
Handled 1 request: Removed Tyap language as completed (via script)
Line 19: Line 19:
<!-- Copy the following code below, filling in page names and reason:
<!-- Copy the following code below, filling in page names and reason:
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|title to revert to|reason=edit summary for the move}}-->
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|title to revert to|reason=edit summary for the move}}-->
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Tyap language | 2 = Tyap | discuss = | reason = [[User:PK2|PK2]] requested a move from [[Tyap language]] to [[Tyap]], and the [[Talk:Tyap language|talk page discussion]] was closed by [[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] as successful (there were no opposes). However, [[User:Fdom5997|Fdom5997]] is move-warring the page back to [[Tyap language]], contrary to the result of the move discussion, and refuses to self-revert: [[User_talk:Fdom5997#Tyap]]. | sig = [[User:Malerisch|Malerisch]] ([[User talk:Malerisch|talk]]) 04:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC) | requester = Malerisch}}

:I have no objection to this request to revert a move back to consensus per a RM open for two weeks, but I'm wondering if this is above RMT's paygrade. Given the user was blocked for continually reverting someone's edits back in March and I see a pattern of people pointing out [[WP:OWN]]ish behavior going back to March 2022 ({{querylink|qs=sort=last_edit_desc&search=Fdom5997&prefix=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27+noticeboard&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1|2=search results for admin noticeboards}} has some false positives), this feels like an ANI (chronic, intractable behavior) or AN3 (move warring) thing? Any of the admin regulars here have an opinion? [[User:Rotideypoc41352|Rotideypoc41352]] ([[User talk:Rotideypoc41352|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/Rotideypoc41352|contribs]]) 08:04, 20 June 2024 (UTC)


==== Contested technical requests ====
==== Contested technical requests ====

Revision as of 08:24, 20 June 2024

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

The bulk of the content relates to the former constituency. I wanted to preserve the edit history rather than cut and paste as you've suggested.--Obi2canibe (talk) 18:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do the two have significantly different borders? If not, I think it's standard practice to leave them as one page.  — Amakuru (talk) 07:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the two constituencies are significantly different. This map shows the arrondissement (old constituency) within the province (new constituency). The area of the constituency increased from 797 km2 to 3,857 km2. The electorate increased from 400,000 to 725,000.--Obi2canibe (talk) 18:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed