Talk:Sudanese civil war (2023–present): Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Sudanese civil war (2023–present)/Archive 3) (bot |
→Suggest removing the "Reactions" section: Is from the first day |
||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
:There probably shouldn't be a reactions section, it reads as a holdover from when the conflict began and doesn't fit the war it became. Rather than simply deleting the text as outdated, it would probably be worth merging it into the timeline articles if the information is absent there. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 06:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC) |
:There probably shouldn't be a reactions section, it reads as a holdover from when the conflict began and doesn't fit the war it became. Rather than simply deleting the text as outdated, it would probably be worth merging it into the timeline articles if the information is absent there. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 06:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Checked, it's a holdover from [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sudanese_civil_war_(2023%E2%80%93present)&diff=prev&oldid=1149932029 15 April] when the page was about the initial outbreak of hostilities. A very different article topic now. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 13:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:11, 4 July 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sudanese civil war (2023–present) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 8 days |
A news item involving Sudanese civil war (2023–present) was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 16 April 2023. |
Text and/or other creative content from 2023 Sudan conflict was copied or moved into Timeline of the 2023 Sudan conflict. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
In the news nomination
An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the Main Page in the "In the news" section. You can visit the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from reliable news sources to include recent events. Notice date: 8 April 2024. Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with Template:ITN talk if appropriate. |
Requested move 26 May 2024
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Follow the sources. (closed by non-admin page mover) Cremastra (talk) 14:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Sudanese civil war (2023–present) → Third Sudanese Civil War – This is the third civil war since independence. It should be titled that way to maintain consistency. Interstellarity (talk) 21:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Are there appropriate sources to support this claim? Previous attempts have been shot down as WP:OR. Borgenland (talk) 21:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. We don't use made up Wikipedia names for things, and I also find the numbering rather problematic as it can be hard to define what's a civil was and what isn't. Present title is recognizable and good. — Amakuru (talk) 22:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yet again, we dont make up random names on wikipedia. Lukt64 (talk) 00:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sudan has been in conflict for so long, it is hard to tell which one we're up to (if we're adding the Darfur and South Kordofan conflicts, we'd be up to the fifth one, but even then you could theoretically lump that into its own 'Third' conflict). Shadowboxer2005 (talk) 03:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. While I do admit that I prefer the proposed name for several reasons, Wikipedia doesn't follow the whims of its editors. WP:RSs haven't been calling it that, therefore we can't. A part of me hopes they'll do so eventually... but hey, what're you going to do? ZionniThePeruser (talk) 04:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose see WP:OR FuzzyMagma (talk) 08:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Clarification: I meant explaining it in the disambiguation page--Sudanese Civil War--not the article's title. I *oppose changing the article's title to Third Sudanese Civil War, but I added the clarification that this is the third such major civil war in Sudan. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 15:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think we have enough sources and information right now to back up this name. We have also discussed this name in the past. So for now I support the current name of the article. Vamos Palmeiras (talk) 18:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- support this move in principle but unfortunately I have no usable argument to back it up other than my opposition to Wikipedia's article title policies and that's another discussion altogether that I don't even know how to start. Charles Essie (talk) 21:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- See the list in Sudanese Civil Wars (SCWs) just to pick up on why the first and second SCW relates to northern and southern Sudan conflict .
- Naming this war the Third SCW is misleading as this war is not related to first and second. This is why the Darfur War was not named the third SCW, and the many other conflicts that followed.
- Remember (and sorry if I sound patronising for an experienced editor like you), that we don’t invent names but we follow what is mentioned widely by reliable press, and I am yet to see that FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support If this page shouldn't be renamed to Third Sudanese Civil War, then why did we name the first two Sudanese Civil Wars the First and Second Sudanese Civil War? Leaving this page Sudanese Civil War (2023–present) is like naming the first civil war article Sudanese Civil War (1955–1972) and the second Sudanese Civil War (1983–2005). Obviously renaming this page Third Sudanese Civil war is a good idea especially the names of the articles of the first two civil wars of Sudan are First and Second Sudanese Civil War's respectively. I agree that this page should be changed and that I 100% support Interstellarity's decision. Also, this page;s current namer doesn't make any sense as I already explained earlier, thanks. 219.77.28.65 (talk) 01:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- It was named first and second according to sources. Why not call it the 4th or 5th if we just naming things as we like?
- the first and second civil wars were continuation of the war in Sudan between north and south. That is why the War in Darfur is not named the third Sudanese civil war because these are different civil wars and not linked.
- I really wish people stop just think that you can make up your own names for any reasons when you cannot do anything in Wikipedia if doesn’t adhere to golden rules FuzzyMagma (talk) 08:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's because the War in Darfur isn't really a civil war, but a rebellion against the then-President Omar al-Bashir. Also, renaming the page to Third Sudanese Civil War isn't something we want. I believe that we should do it as I already mentioned earlier. Also, we're not breaking any rules and that we have a reason, thanks. 219.77.28.65 (talk) 10:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think you really do not understand what civil war means. Let me put it in a context you might understand, for example, the American Civil War was also between the President and rebels. All of Sudanese civil wars were between the government and so called “rebels” (very heavy quotations)
- Anyway, if you don’t have sources to support your opinion or policies, your vote will be ignored FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't originally plan this. However, you've got a good point. But I still think it's good if the name of the page should be moved. But like I just said, I didn't originally plan this. Let's just see if this process will be successful or not, thanks. 219.77.28.65 (talk) 12:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's because the War in Darfur isn't really a civil war, but a rebellion against the then-President Omar al-Bashir. Also, renaming the page to Third Sudanese Civil War isn't something we want. I believe that we should do it as I already mentioned earlier. Also, we're not breaking any rules and that we have a reason, thanks. 219.77.28.65 (talk) 10:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. I think almost everyone would prefer a succinct name like this but the sources are just not calling it as such, and we follow the sources. Yeoutie (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Remove Ukraine from the infobox
Ukraine being in the infobox as a belligerent is actively misleading to readers and does not reflect the sources we are citing. These sources say that limited strikes were made by Ukraine against Wagner Group mercenaries operating in Sudan, not that Ukraine is actively supported the SAF as a co-belligerent. The sources don't even say that these mercenaries were engaged in active combat against the SAF, indeed other sources cited in the article clearly state they were merely providing military supplies to the RSF via convoy. As such, claiming that Ukraine is actively fighting on the side of the SAF is not true and should not be implied by the infobox. Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done make sense as all supporting countries are not included, include UAE, in the infobox FuzzyMagma (talk) 07:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Suggest removing the "Reactions" section
Currently this article is sitting at about 13000 words of text, and while its obviously a massive topic that merits as large an article as reasonable that's still very close to the maximum allocated by the guidelines on article size, especially considering further developments in the war will likely see more content added. As such, I propose removing the 'Reactions' section as a first step, since it contains mostly unimportant and outdated information. The reactions of important groups, such as the National Umma Party, Sudanese Communist Party and the international community can be covered in the 'Course of the war' and 'Foreign involvement' sections. Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:43, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- There probably shouldn't be a reactions section, it reads as a holdover from when the conflict began and doesn't fit the war it became. Rather than simply deleting the text as outdated, it would probably be worth merging it into the timeline articles if the information is absent there. CMD (talk) 06:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Checked, it's a holdover from 15 April when the page was about the initial outbreak of hostilities. A very different article topic now. CMD (talk) 13:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- B-Class Africa articles
- Top-importance Africa articles
- B-Class Sudan articles
- Top-importance Sudan articles
- WikiProject Sudan articles
- WikiProject Africa articles
- B-Class International relations articles
- Top-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class African military history articles
- African military history task force articles
- B-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report