Talk:Bladee: Difference between revisions

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance). Sweden Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Hip hop Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Alternative music Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is it really called for to try to list all of his singles and guest appearances? It's already extremely incomplete, and given that he generally releases or is featured on new songs multiple times monthly it seems like this would quickly get out of hand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puzzlemap (talk • contribs) 03:27, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, it's similar to how Gucci Mane has an entire separate article for his full discography (see Gucci Mane discography), but bladee isn't notable enough to warrant a full second article like that. I believe we should limit it to major singles leading up to an album release, and features on main Yung Lean projects, i.e. Decay/Who Goes There/Hennessy & Sailor Moon. Jbeandelphiki (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

why would we limit it to yung lean's projects The579 (talk) 17:36, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

i think we should just delete the whole parts The579 (talk) 17:36, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

According to an interview with Nardwuar, Bladee also notes that an alternative pronunciation is "blade-e", or "bleɪd i". This has already been included into the article yet somewhat poorly. Wondering if anyone wants to make this change properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.14.106.151 (talk) 21:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is enough sourced material that states "blade" is the official pronunciation, a vague remark in a interview isn't enough. Second Skin (talk) 21:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperpop is a vague genre that is way too niche to consider Bladee a hyperpop artist. The same source that refers to Bladee being hyperpop also lists Rico Nasty as hyperpop. Her article/page does not have any mention of hyperpop. The Hyperpop wikipedia article makes no mention of Bladee. Bladee likes to experiment, he doesn't constrict himself to a specific genre. Experimental pop would be a good genre to put Bladee under. On SoundCloud he never lists his music as Hyperpop, he lists it as alternative. To consider Bladee confined to a genre or consider himself to apply himself to a genre is a very surface level observation. If you were to listen to all his albums at the time of his releases, you'd realize he experiments with each album. To say he made a hyperpop is quite an insult to his musical genius and bravery of stepping out of boundaries with each album. Maybe some of his songs could be compared to Hyperpop, but it doesn't mean he's a hyperpop artist. He is experimental. --Drogge (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The parts talking about his albums are already there under the 2.1 section "music". Also, the information isn't correct, Gluee was Bladee's debut album (if we ignore Rainworld). — Preceding unsigned comment added by I2qd (talk • contribs) 15:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I revoke my statement - Gluee is a mixtape [1]. Still seems unproductive to note "Reichwald released his debut album Eversince in 2016, and his second album Red Light in 2018—both through Stockholm record label YEAR0001." When we have multiple sections for his music. I2qd (talk) 15:48, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The lead is meant to summarize information from the main body of the article, so including that information in the lead (given that it is in the main body of the article) seems to make sense. TylerBurden (talk) 16:25, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable why it mentions those two albums then? Surely Crest would be more important or relevant. I2qd (talk) 19:34, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to be WP:BOLD and edit the article. TylerBurden (talk) 19:52, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still new here so thank you for guiding me. I2qd (talk) 08:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Bladee-benjamin-reichwald-for-marc-jacobs-heaven-spring-2021-14.webp

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

not even extremely notable singles, amygdala was a well received single but not notable in the context of how the discography is written since it is 1/2 singles. i am not sure why real springs is even mentioned at all because he is just featured in it and not even his first feature on a skrillex song (summertime blood i believe was his first). if singles are being listed it should be notable ones i think because listing just 1 or 2 seems like they are very important BabeXbox (talk) 17:57, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone. Recently I have made some edits to the article that have been proved contentious. I'd like to discuss them here in order to come to a consensus. When I edited this article I did so in good faith, but it seems that some do not agree with my view.

User:TylerBurden has reverted the edits I have made, specifically the inclusion of a signature[2] and as well as the inclusion of the word "performing" in the photo caption. Both of these edits are commonplace amongst musical artists, and I see no contention in their inclusion in this article. If anyone would like to offer their view to this I would be happy to come to a consensus. 333fortheain (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So according to your standards, I can take a blurry photo and claim it is a WP:NOTABLE person and their signature? Surely you can see the issue with that? Per WP:BLP, Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page, including but not limited to articles, talk pages, project pages, and drafts. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States, to this policy, and to Wikipedia's three core content policies.

How is that a quality source and how is the image caption addition not redundant given that the image clearly shows him performing? TylerBurden (talk) 00:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]