Talk:Soviet collectivism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:36, 20 November 2003

It was quite insane to mention the borg or a just humour we do not understand. What do you think about the tragedy of the commons and mentioning Eric Raymond towards the end , in the light that RMS was categorical against the allegation from Bill Gates that "open source is Anti-American and communism". Any chances it will be taken wrongly?

Maybe it's just me, but a reference to the Borg of Star Trek on a page about Soviet Collectivism just makes me gnash my teeth. orthogonal 18:57, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)

It's not encyclopedic. But them I'm not into Star Trek. Secretlondon 18:58, Nov 20, 2003 (UTC)

The whole freaking page is a travesty (no offense, intended, but it's a muddle). What next, Napoleon Bonaparte and hobbits? orthogonal 19:00, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:30, 20 November 2003 edit Gdimitr (talk \| contribs) 26 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:36, 20 November 2003 edit undo Gdimitr (talk \| contribs) 26 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	It was quite insane to mention the borg or a just humour we do not understand. What do you think about the tragedy of the commons and mentioning Eric Raymond towards the end , in the light that RMS was ~~answering~~ to allegation that "open source is Anti-American and communism". Any chances it will be taken wrongly?		It was quite insane to mention the borg or a just humour we do not understand. What do you think about the tragedy of the commons and mentioning Eric Raymond towards the end , in the light that RMS was allegation that "open source is Anti-American and communism". Any chances it will be taken wrongly?