Jump to content

User talk:Abecedare: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Adminship: new section
Line 71: Line 71:


: You seem to be on the wrong website. Please read [[WP:SOAPBOX]]. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare#top|talk]]) 15:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
: You seem to be on the wrong website. Please read [[WP:SOAPBOX]]. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare#top|talk]]) 15:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

== Adminship ==

You should run for adminship one day. You have great potential. [[user:Nichalp|<font color="#0082B8">=Nichalp</font>]] [[User Talk:Nichalp|<font color="#0082B8">«Talk»=</font>]] 20:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:27, 31 January 2009

.

Lalit Jagannath

Hey, you might be interested in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Lalit Jagannath. Any comments would be deeply appreciated. --Enigma Machine (talk) 04:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, could not get your comment properly. "block artifacts" meaning ?? I have only brightened the image a bit, using HP Image Zone. --Redtigerxyz Talk 09:44, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained my comments on the VPC page. I had earlier linked to the incorrect "current version"; hope that didn't cause the confusion. Regards. Abecedare (talk) 10:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the two are making similar edits like the removal of Five headed Shiva img. But we can assume that they two are different. If the same issues arise on the article, a formal sock complaint can be registered. An admin can be contacted to use "checkuser". --Redtigerxyz Talk 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry,I have not aware of 3RR rule.

Another thing is the article Darpa should be created. But i dont get referent sources for.--Powerprowess (talk) 06:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I read and understood WP:NPOV and edit warring--Powerprowess (talk) 06:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletions

Thanks for taking care of all the copyvios uploaded by Light48 (talk · contribs). Abecedare (talk) 05:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Most welcome - Hopefully he gets the hint - Peripitus (Talk) 06:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Governors of Bombay, you said you would revisit later in the week for a second review. I'm just giving you a prod as I would like to close the nomination one way or the other at the weekend. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk contribs  email) 08:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Abecedare. I noticed you have compiled some data about a certain sock issue. The guy you are tracking seems to operate from 136.159.*.*, which is associated with a Canadian university. Could you take a look at a recent report on the WP:AN3 noticeboard? It is currently at this link. This is somebody who wars on Indian religious topics, but has a 70.72.*.* IP, i.e. he is from the same city but not at the university. If we could get an exact match, then a longer block could be justified, There is some risk of mixing up nationalists who happen to think alike. Thanks for any advice you can provide. EdJohnston (talk) 04:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They're all Maleabroad. I blocked a set a few months ago and told Mitsube and Anishshah to tell me if he popped up again but he didn't. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 04:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Novicex0 (talk · contribs) was a recent avatar, if someone cares to run a CU - not that there is any real need. I'll email Ed and you some further behavioral evidence to keep an eye out for. Abecedare (talk) 04:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The cure for cancer? no?

Hello,

I see you posted a complaint about my contributions on my talk page.

Just a personal question:

If there is a cure for cancer, don't you think people should have a honest chance to read about it? Numerous references have been supplied. Whole articles have been deleted. I thought the idea of Wikipedia was to have both sides of the story side by side. Of course the medical establishment gets the final word on everything but to prefer quackwatch over medical research makes my stomach turn over. I'm not going to edit wikipedia anymore, I just wanted to hear what you think about helping to kill people like this.

Look how corporate cancer is killing the wiki? There is more but lets leave it to this. I'm all done editing with so much wp:own going on.

I'm just currious, how do you feel doing this? People do die you know? 84.104.135.86 (talk) 15:51, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be on the wrong website. Please read WP:SOAPBOX. Abecedare (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

You should run for adminship one day. You have great potential. =Nichalp «Talk»= 20:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]