Jump to content

Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/April/19: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Alai (talk | contribs)
58,547 edits
→‎April 19: closing
Line 1: Line 1:
===April 19===
===April 19===
====Spanish geography stub types====
====Spanish geography stub types====
{{sfd top| '''variously '''upmerge''' and '''rename''', per nom''' }}
Despite being told several times over the past year and a half when he caused various problems for stub-sorting, that stub types have certain standards and that the naming, creation, and upkeep of them has to meet certain criteria, [[User:Satesclop]] has recently been creating and modifying a considerable number of templates. New ones in the last few days - apart from the Ceuta and Melilla ones mentioned yesterday - include the following problematical templates and categories:
Despite being told several times over the past year and a half when he caused various problems for stub-sorting, that stub types have certain standards and that the naming, creation, and upkeep of them has to meet certain criteria, [[User:Satesclop]] has recently been creating and modifying a considerable number of templates. New ones in the last few days - apart from the Ceuta and Melilla ones mentioned yesterday - include the following problematical templates and categories:
*{{tl|BalearicIslands-geo-stub}}/{{cl|Balearic Islands geography stubs}} - will almost certainly need '''upmerging''', and the template should <s>probably</s>''definitely'' be at {{tl|Balearics-geo-stub}} , since the term "Balearics" is unambiguous (we usually only use the XIslands form if doing otherwise would be confusing, and since the non geo equivalent is at {{tl|Balearics-stub}}.
*{{tl|BalearicIslands-geo-stub}}/{{cl|Balearic Islands geography stubs}} - will almost certainly need '''upmerging''', and the template should <s>probably</s>''definitely'' be at {{tl|Balearics-geo-stub}} , since the term "Balearics" is unambiguous (we usually only use the XIslands form if doing otherwise would be confusing, and since the non geo equivalent is at {{tl|Balearics-stub}}.
Line 21: Line 22:
::Alas, I'm waiting for someone else to close this, as you and I are interested parties. [[User:Pegship|Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 21:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
::Alas, I'm waiting for someone else to close this, as you and I are interested parties. [[User:Pegship|Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 21:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
:::I've left a note with someone who can hopefully close it. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 00:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
:::I've left a note with someone who can hopefully close it. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 00:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
{{sfd bottom}}

Revision as of 10:26, 20 May 2009

April 19

Spanish geography stub types

Template:Sfd top Despite being told several times over the past year and a half when he caused various problems for stub-sorting, that stub types have certain standards and that the naming, creation, and upkeep of them has to meet certain criteria, User:Satesclop has recently been creating and modifying a considerable number of templates. New ones in the last few days - apart from the Ceuta and Melilla ones mentioned yesterday - include the following problematical templates and categories:

He also made changes to 12 other geo-stub categories - largely involving removing parent categories and interwiki links - and 9 other geo-stub templates, all of which have been either partially or completely reverted. Grutness...wha? 08:38, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Granada

On a related subject, one of Satesclop's earlier unproposed creations was Category:Granada province geography stubs. It has reached threshold, but should be at Category:Granada (province) geography stubs. Rename. Grutness...wha? 08:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If there are stubs of Andalusia, Estremadura, La Rioja, Canary Islands, Aragon or Castile and León, why there can no be categories of the rest of Spanish autonomies?
This happens because an ignoramus from New Zealand interferes in matters that he does not know on Spain... Satesclop 20:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your kind words. I suggest you read the rules on when stub categories should and should not be made, as laid out at WP:STUB. While you're there, it would be worth your while to also read WP:Etiquette. Grutness...wha? 01:44, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No one, ignoramus or otherwise, has proposed such categories in the correct venue, Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals. If you want something done, do it properly. Rename Granada, btw. Pegship (talk) 20:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Those keeping track may be interested to know that I've just had to roll back about 40 changes that Satesclop made to geo-stub categories and templates. He's one step away from a block. Grutness...wha? 02:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alas, I'm waiting for someone else to close this, as you and I are interested parties. Pegship (talk) 21:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've left a note with someone who can hopefully close it. Grutness...wha? 00:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sfd bottom

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion/Log/2009/April/19&oldid=291149678"