Jump to content

Talk:Time Gal: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
CarpetCrawler (talk | contribs)
adding
CarpetCrawler (talk | contribs)
GA
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA nominee|23:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)|page=1| subtopic=Video games|status=}}
{{GA|:, 2009 (UTC)|=Video games|=}}
{{WikiProject Video games|class=B|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Video games|class=|importance=Low}}

==Blood, gore, nudity==
I don't think this game has blood, gore, and nudity at all! Can anyone show me some soures and prove this????? ([[User:LonerXL|LonerXL]] ([[User talk:LonerXL|talk]]) 01:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC))
I don't think this game has blood, gore, and nudity at all! Can anyone show me some soures and prove this????? ([[User:LonerXL|LonerXL]] ([[User talk:LonerXL|talk]]) 01:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC))



Revision as of 05:54, 5 June 2009

WikiProject iconVideo games GA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Blood, gore, nudity

I don't think this game has blood, gore, and nudity at all! Can anyone show me some soures and prove this????? (LonerXL (talk) 01:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I've played this game many times, and I KNOW it doesn't have that stuff. Somebody keeps vandalizing this page. Anyway, I just fixed everything. Let's hope it doesn't happen again. Brittany Ka (talk) 11:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment as of 2009-05-31

Holy crap.

Actually that's the reaction I got from the article. I mean I'm really impressed by the work you did. Rating B-class, and I don't see too much of a reason for it not to pass GAN. If there's one thing I'd suggest, removing the home versions subheader possibly (it just seems odd with only one preceding paragraph, but that's more a personal thing than anything), and for the podcast reference change it to use the {{Cite podcast}} template. Good luck, hope this helps!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated. I was also surprised at how much was actually out there. Though I'd feel more comfortable with more development content before going to GAN. :-\ Per your suggestion, I updated the template with cite podcast. I guess I'll keep the home version subheader, mainly to keep the arcade and home info separate. I'll see how it fairs at GAN.
Thank you for the comments. (Guyinblack25 talk 23:26, 31 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]


GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Time Gal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hello, I will be reviewing this article. Check back soon for a full review! CarpetCrawlermessage me 18:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA pass

The article looks good, so I will pass it! It is nicely written and sourced, and I have no issues or qualms with the article. Good work, and congratulations! CarpetCrawlermessage me 05:53, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]