Talk:Gorgoroth name dispute: Difference between revisions

Gorgoroth name dispute received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Norway C‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Law C‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Metal C‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Black Metal C‑class (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Metal, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Black MetalWikipedia:WikiProject Black MetalTemplate:WikiProject Black MetalBlack Metal articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Since I don't feel ready to make the section now, I will be using this page to outline some of my ideas for the overview section. They will include Gaahl's and King's reasonings (which have varied in multiple sources such as Revolver magazine) as well as perhaps those of Infernus, and certainly the legal clauses etc. that underpin his claim to the name. Dark Prime (talk) 13:09, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems to be addressing the issue with a bias in favor of Infernus. Although the legal outcome favors him, the article itself should only use language that encourages neutrality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2CrudeDudes (talk • contribs) 19:36, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have to disagree with this, as I do not see how the article addresses this issue in favor of Infernus. The article is exhaustively put together and sourced, and in my opinion it shows the facts in a neutral way, showing both sides' arguments, making the readers of the article able to form their own opinion about the matter, based on the available facts. Bulgakoff (talk) 21:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]