Talk:Languages of Slovenia: Difference between revisions

Slovenia Start‑class High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Slovenia to-do list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks you can do (watch): Requests: Jože Tisnikar (sl), Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl) Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308 Expand: Education in Slovenia Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Omar Naber, Radenska NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band) Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture Help assess the quality of 66 unassessed articles Take/Add requested photographs

Languages Start‑class High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I care to this, that add to the prekmurian in article. Disputed and unrecognized, but in the communistic Yugoslavia was treat to the prekmurian language. Doncsecz^znánje 19:07, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The anon 89.212.243.255 allege, that the article of the Prekmurian language is written poorly. This is untrue. I wonder, whether come by references. Doncsecz^talk 14:06, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your level of English is poor and insufficient for contributing to English Wikipedia. Section on Prekmurian as well as your comments on Discussion page are NOT proper English. 89.212.243.255^talk 18:01, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So, dear anon from Slovenia! You what for not correct to the section? This is not exception, that not english. The real censure as likely as not, that the prekmurian like "language." Doncsecz^talk 15:50, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prekmurian language not merely dialect, american linguist Marc L. Greenberg from Los Angeles also was formulate to (this is english source!). Josip Tito, Misko Kranjec and Ferdo Godina, the "august" heroes of Prekmurje was befoul the prekmurian language and literature, that this is a dialect of pubs. Doncsecz^talk 08:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As the founding author of this article I am taking the liberty of commenting on this topic as well as making some changes. Firstly, Doncsecz, your writing on the talk-page is very difficult to understand because of your inadequate English skills. Your contributions to the article are not any better. If you are not competent to contribute in English, list your suggestions in the talk-page and someone with adequate knowledge of the language will incorporate them in the article. Secondly, I have to agree with the anonymous author above. By contemporary standards, Prekmurian as spoken by the local population today is not a language. (See the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prekmurian_dialect). Old Prekmurian might have been a separate language (some scholar texts confirm that), but that particular language is not spoken any more. Since this is an article about languages presently spoken, I propose deleting it from the article. Mhus 09:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhus (talk • contribs)

Sorry, but there you are mistaken: between 1920 and 1945 was in the usega the new prekmurian standard language. The communistic regime in 1945 was ban to the prekmurian press and liturgy and later but talk about the old prekmurian standard the slovene lexicons, but the standard language from József Klekl sen. and József Szakovics also today clear. / Oprostite, ampak motiš: med 1920 in 1945 je bila v uporabi nova knjižna prekmurščina. Komunistični režim je zabranil prekmurski tisk in prekmursko liturgijo, ter kasneje so slovenski leksikoni samo o stari prekmurščini pisali, ampak novi knjižni jezik Jožefa Klekla st. in Jožefa Sakoviča še vedno razumljiv. 81.183.26.201 (talk) 12:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorrowful, that Mhus not see through the situation, but today the slovene linguists and others otherwise adjudge the complexion of prekmurian. The Kajkavian and Chakavian also not dinkey dialects, the quality of prekmurian also alike, but this by 50 years distort the comunistic policy. Incidentally the old prekmurian today also spoken language, as the Goričko dialect, and the dialect of Raba March still arhaic speech. / Neljubno, da Mhus ne ugani situacije, ampak danes slovenski jezikoslovci in drugi drugače razsodijo prekmurščino. Kajkavščina in čakavščina tudi nista bistveni narečji, kakovost prekmurščine tudi podobna, ampak skozi 50 let komunistična politika jo je popačila. Pravzaprav danes še govorijo staro prekmurščino, ker goričko in porabsko narečje arhaični narečji. 81.183.26.201 (talk) 12:55, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed Prekmurian from the list of languages spoken in Slovenia even though it has written tradition. Per WP:WEIGHT, the criterion for inclusion is to demonstrate with reliable sources that at least a significant minority of linguists describe it as an autonomous or heteronomous language. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 08:57, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to Venetian language, it is also spoken in Slovenian Istria. If this is true and a reference can be found, the information should be added to this article too. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 17:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kakor sem napisal tukaj in tudi tebi. V uradih tudi govorijo v prekmurščini, predvsem vsakdanašnje besede prekmursko, druge (terminološke) besede slovensko. / As i wrote here and for you. In offices also speak prekmurian, above all everyday word, the terms in Slovene language. Doncsecz^talk 12:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the Prekmurian dialect belongs to the article. It is not described as a distinct language in the article and the linguist Marko Jesenšek described it as a standardized superdialectal formation ("normirana naddialektalna tvorba") alongside the Central Slovene language, both of which merged into the unified Slovene language.[1] (in Slovene) --Eleassar ^{my talk} 14:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is like not true. I was talked with Jesenšek, but see the Augustich's Prijátel and Klekl's Novine. "United" with the Central Slovene language - no! Few idioms and words take from the new literary language from the Slovene (and the Croatian and Serbo-Croatian language), but still differing the Prekmurian language. And the spoken language distinct off the Augistich's and Klekl's Prekmurian literary standard. Besides József Klekl wrote in the Novine in 1934, that still significant the Prekmurian language. This is was fusion, but the Prekmurian Standard language was also differing. Doncsecz^talk 14:39, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a trilingual history in old and new prekmurian, and slovene. The new prekmurian is very favour to Slovene, but still differing. The Old prekmurian also is new language, as this is the spoken language also today. Doncsecz^talk 14:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What I have presented is a reliable article published in 1992 by a respected linguist in a respected journal on linguistics. The quote from the above-mentioned reference: "[prekmurski jezik] v sredini 19. stoletja združil z osrednjeslovenskim knjižnim jezikom v enoten slovenski knjižni jezik." Exactly what I have written. See also [2] The trilingual history is redundant as we're not here to find out the truth but report what has been published (see WP:OR). On the other side, I don't know how does "normirana naddialektalna tvorba" differ from a language, however we have to stick to terminology used by sources. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 15:44, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but Franci Just, Vilko Novak, Jožef Smej also received persons. József Klekl was like autonomy to the Prekmurje (or political, or some language-autonomy). I was spoken with Jesenšek, she reckon, that united the prekmurian and Slovene, but whereby? The Slovene language was receive Prekmurisms? No. The prekmurian was fus to the Slovene language, but retain the prekmurian inflection and the notable proportion of the lexical. The citation was from the Novine. Doncsecz^talk 16:03, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, can you point exactly where the people you mention discuss the Prekmurian language as a distinct language from Slovenian so that me and others may verify this? --Eleassar ^{my talk} 16:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, read to the Med verzuško in pesmijo. You was excise this sentence: Prominent old writers in Prekmurian maintained that Prekmurian a language. But readable in the Novine:

. Besides Jesenšek not contest the speciality of the Prekmurian. Jožef Smej also wrote about the specific prekmurian dialect (Prevajanje Svetega pisma v stari slovenski jezik, Stopinje 2008.) Dulichenko grade the Prekmurian like (micro)language. Other linguists allow for the attitudes of the speakers. Doncsecz^talk 16:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the Slovene language did receive influences of Prekmurian dialect (which you call 'Prekmurisms'), especially in the period of linguistic purism from the end of the 18th century till the middle of the 19th century. The linguist Martina Orožen says:"V 18. stoletju je izpričan pri slovenskih slovaropiscih (Ks. Vorenc 1703-10, P. Hipolit, O. Gutsman, M. Pohlin), ki upoštevajo celo hrvaške kajkavske slovarje ter »hrvaške in ilirske« vire, vse od konca 18. stoletja pa je značilen vpliv Š. Küzmiča na oblikovanje slovenske knjižne norme v 19. stoletju. Prav to vzhodnoslovensko, pa tudi kajkavsko knjižno besedišče je odigralo pomembno vlogo v purističnem obdobju slovenskega knjižnega jezika od konca 18. do srede 19. stoletja, saj so bile stare »popačenke« kranjskega knjižnega jezika večinoma nadomeščene prav s »starimi« vzhodnoslovenskimi ustreiniki. Proces te izmenjave je nakazan že v Dalmatinovem Registru, o »čistosti« jezika pa je govoril tudi Krelj, ki je bil mnenja, da se v »Kranji inu Korotani govori dopolu nemški«"[3] So the Prekmurian (part of the Eastern Slovene language) and the Central Slovene language did unite into a single standard Slovene language, as already stated in the article by Jesenšek. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 18:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As to Dulichenko and microlanguages, the English Wikipedia already has the article Slavic microlanguages that states: "Slavic microlanguages exist both as geographically and socially peripheral dialects [emphasis is mine] of more well-established Slavic languages". --Eleassar ^{my talk} 18:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I lay down:

1. The Communistic Propaganda between 1945 and 1991 was abuse the remembrance of the prekmurian literature. Miško Kranjec, Ferdo Godina, Rudi Čačinovič the cardinal propagandists. Moreover Kranjec is a killer, war criminal.
2. The Slovene Civilians don't care the attidue of Prekmurje. Evald Flisar the writer was explain in 2008: for the Slovenes is impasives the Prekmurje and Prekmurian language
3. József Klekl, József Szakovics, József Csárics and other politicians was aspire obtain autonomy for the Prekmurje, where the official language the Prekmurian
4. Feri Lainšček, Branko Pintarič, Vlado Kreslin, Milan Vincetič, Milan Zrinski also declerative undertake the Prekmurian
5. Some nationalist and the politicians be opposed the Prekmurian language
6. The oppinion of the Slovene linguist is null, as the Scandinavian-Germanic language also hardly differents language.

This affair is congrous with the Talk:Croatian language, where the Torlakian is an "Croatian variant"(????) what an great philological absurdity! The Prekmurian and Carinthian dialect have also few Germanism and Hungarism, but not German and Hungarian variants! Doncsecz^talk 20:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is very absurdity, after few dozen article, book and disquisition from the Museum of Murska Sobota, Vilko Novak, Mária Kozár, Ágoston Pável etc. accent the autonomity of the Prekmurje and Prekmurian, the Prekmurian not the special variant of the Slovene. Doncsecz^talk 20:27, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Has anyone noticed that the keyboard image is not accurate? It should be corrected. --Tone 16:16, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider joining the feedback request service. An editor has requested comments from other editors for this discussion. Within 24 hours, this page will be added to the following list: Language and linguistics When discussion has ended, remove this tag and it will be removed from the list. If this page is on additional lists, they will be noted below.

Should the Prekmurian dialect (or language, which I dispute it is) be treated in the article under its own section as one of the languages of Slovenia? --Eleassar ^{my talk} 09:14, 12 January 2011 (UTC) The language altogether is traditional designation, not any allusion, that the Prekmurian is entirely separate language, only separate dialect. Doncsecz^talk 10:59, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In turn is simple: the slovene questings more often care for the Prekmurian. The Prekmurian the most interested, notorious dialect. Feri Lainšček is notoriety in Slovenia, in his works also popularize the Prekmurje country, what is more: independently produce works in Prekmurian. Other Slovene writers also apply his dialects, but only localisms build in the romans and verses, whichs is mostly in Slovene Standard Language. Namely the style of the Prekmurian is fare-gone through the secular traditions. Doncsecz^talk 09:26, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I wouldn't even start arguing about this Balkan-stuff — if you list Croatian, Serbo-Croatian, Serbian, and Bosnian, then yeah, list Prekmurian as well, and probably every other village that claims to be "different". Needs to be shortened, though, per WP:UNDUE. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 11:26, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Dialects should be somehow mentioned, but certainly not in the same level as languages spoken in neighbouring countries. I know that there are notoriously many and diverse Slovenian dialects for such a small country, and I think a short summary-style section (==Slovene dialects==) is justified. What I don't know, though, is how much Prekmurian stands out of these dialects. According to Doncsecz, it is the one with strongest literary tradition (and perhaps the greatest distance?), but I really don't know much. Even if it's true, it should get a couple of sentences in a separate paragraph, with a link to the main article Prekmurian dialect would suffice. No such user (talk) 12:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ca. 5 speech constitute the Prekmurian (Porábsko, Goričko, Ravensko, Soboško, Dolinsko), but here the differences check in the intonation, for ex. the spirit in the Porabje döj in the Goričko and Ravensko düj. The soup in the Goričko župa, but in the Ravensko speech žüpa, or tivariš-tüvariš-collegue; sluga-slüga-servent. The difference is low in the vocubulary: in my village the shawl is vacalejk, in the neighbour village šörc, or the cementery in the North-Goričko cíntor, but in West britof. Doncsecz^talk 12:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At long last an meaningful edition: 1. Only require a measure of makeup 2, as it happens is absurdity simplify the theme. Doncsecz^talk 18:19, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The current version seems much better, I welcome the discussion about the dialects of Slovene in the article, although it should be more comprehensive (not dealing just with Prekmurje dialect). --Eleassar ^{my talk} 13:00, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article of the Prekmurian and this text also clear the situation of the Prekmurian. Doremo's term the Prekmurje dialect is deadly dull, as gramatically is correct (the name Prekmurje not contain adjective-build). Doncsecz^talk 15:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't understand why we are fighting here over a paragraph that is a. written in very, very poor English and b. contains not a single reference to a reliable source. Why not start with that? I would suggest cutting out that entire paragraph on those grounds, grammar and lack of sourcing. Drmies (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is at it again: insecure the source. At present also in the article of Croatian language scores cock, and few dunce person try tell off! Doncsecz^talk 17:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]