Template talk:POV section: Difference between revisions

Possible change--add variable to allow for direct linking to dispute section on talk. Syntax: {{npov-section|Talk section header}}.

The problem is the backlog of section tags without the variable. -SV|t 17:40, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to change it to {{{1|}}}, so that only if there is a variable will the section thing occur. AndyZ _t 23:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What about linking the Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View so that it looks like

to make it consistant with the other NPOV templates? I'm going to be bold and change it, but please revert if you disagree (and say why!) Cursive 15:42, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}}
Please replace the current image with this one: Image:Emblem-scales.svg (). Thanks -- penubag  (talk) 03:39, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done - Nihiltres^{t.l} 13:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} Thank you, but you wouldn't mind scaling the image down to 42px? -- penubag  (talk) 00:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Happy‑melon 11:51, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the template into a call to {{POV}}, to reduce redundancy. Superm401 - Talk 18:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} Please add {{pp-template}} to the template itself, inside the <noinclude>...</noinclude> tags, of course. I added it to the documentation, but since the documentation page is used on other - non-protected - pages as well, that wasn't the correct solution. Thank you, Debresser (talk) 14:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. :) Debresser (talk) 14:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Dutch: Sjabloon:NPOV-gedeelte

In French: Modèle:Désaccord de neutralité

(The French box for npov doubles as both for article use and for section use)

Thanks. (We really need a way for users to update the non-problematic parts of locked pages) Gronky (talk) 00:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does the person who locked this page read the Talk page? Gronky (talk) 10:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not. That's normally what the {{editprotected}} template is for, to attract admins to make such uncontroversial changes. However, in this case you can simply do it yourself. Most protected templates pull their documentation, ctegorization, and interwiki links from the documentation subpage, in this case Template:POV-section/doc, which is unprotected.
Amalthea 11:21, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That worked. Thanks for explaining it to me. Gronky (talk) 19:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is requested that an edit be made to the template-protected template at Template:POV section. (edit · history · last · links · sandbox · edit sandbox · sandbox history · sandbox last edit · sandbox diff · transclusion count · protection log) This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately. Edit requests to template-protected pages should only be used for edits that are either uncontroversial or supported by consensus. If the proposed edit might be controversial, discuss it on the protected page's talk page before using this template. Consider making changes first to the template's sandbox before submitting an edit request. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the |answered=yes parameter to deactivate the template.

Section templates are generally small=left, so that should be added to this template

Please add

|small={{{small|left}}}

to the template. (and add a

|small={{{small|}}}

to Template:POV to make this possible on this template.)

76.65.128.198 (talk) 05:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]