Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LiteralKa: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 36: Line 36:
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
<br>
Yea how do I prove that i am not LiteralKa? Does wikipedia need my dox?

Yea how do I prove that i am not LiteralKa? Does wikipedia need my dox?


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======

Revision as of 01:48, 29 September 2012

LiteralKa

LiteralKa (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)


28 September 2012

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

Basedircrory has been promoting GNAA by editing a template to show full name including "Nigger" in several articles[1][2][3] after only a dozen edits and in a manner similar to recently blocked sock Mythpage88 who is a blocked sock of LiteralKa.

Maractus has been interacting with the banned sockpuppets and the GNAA article,[4] and on his userpage claims to be a both a "twink" and a Black youth pictured in a government photograph taken in the early 1970s.["this is me irl"]

Zaiger has a similar editing history covering GNAA and related articles including shaming me for questioning Maractus' claim that he is a "twink" who would have to be in his 50s by now, on the GNAA talk page.[5] Zaiger's userpage is filled with internet meme references similar to the other editors such as Mythpage88.

https://facebook.com/zaiger
https://twitter.com/zaiger
Have I proven I am a real person yet? Would you like a drivers license scan as well? I would appreciate it if you would leave me out this paranoid nonsense. --Zaiger (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Do you ever make constructive edits on Wikipedia? It's easy to find examples of GNAA-themed vandalism in your edit history, e.g. [6]. —Cupco 01:19, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What does that have to do with anything? This has to do with me being a sock puppet, which I have proven that I am not. Cupco is obviously homophobic and harassment on Wikipedia should NOT be tolerated. Please stop. --Zaiger (talk) 01:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:NOTHERE. You have previously tried to obscure the fact that GNAA members have been blocked for introducing photosensitive epilepsy-provoking material.[7] Do you think personal attacks claiming I have been homophobic are helping you make your case? —Cupco 01:24, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not a sockpuppet, you're wrong. You lost. Get over it. --Zaiger (talk) 01:26, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is substantial evidence in the user compare report suggesting otherwise, not to mention WP:DUCK. —Cupco 01:30, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
lol a checkuser will prove that asinine statement wrong in a second, not mention I use my real name. Any Admin with an IQ above room temperature can safely assume that I am my own person and that this is my only account. what is your real name? You are the one trolling in anonymity. --Zaiger (talk) 01:40, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Basedircrory believes I am a sockpuppet of Selery (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki); I am not. —Cupco 21:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Yea how do I prove that i am not LiteralKa? Does wikipedia need my dox? Basedircrory (talk) 01:47, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments