User talk:Basedircrory: Difference between revisions

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ultra Brite was changed by Basedircrory (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963122 on 2012-09-25T01:27:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:27, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Basedircrory! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there! Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:50, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you care to discuss your reasons for spelling out GNAA in the template? —Cupco 18:17, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cupco. I respect your wish to be discrete about the gnaa but I find that wikipedia is not the place for censorship. I suspect that youre a sockpuppet of selery who was banned. Basedircrory (talk) 20:32, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per Template talk:Hacking_in_the_2010s and that template's history and the fact that you've only made a few edits, none of which are particularly constructive, I suspect you are a sockpuppet of the GNAA member who has been making the identical changes to that template. —Cupco 20:49, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brohoof! Maractus (talk) 23:48, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Having previously spent a considerable amount of time poring over this person's contributions from a long list of accounts and IP addresses, I am pretty familiar with the relevant patterns of behavior and content. I agree with your conclusions here. Let me know if you want help writing the SPI. --Amble (talk) 23:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can't really supervise -- I'm just a regular editor, who happened to go through the same procedure recently. But I can lend a hand. I think your evidence is good so far. I'm adding a mention of the dark matter-related edits by the IP, as those are a dead giveaway. --Amble (talk) 06:59, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of adding the checkuser and checkip templates at the SPI page. --Amble (talk) 07:09, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Basedircrory (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}