Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
no opinion on the wait till archive period (3 days seems quite short, but well... unsure); but it was (accidentally?) reverted without a rationale while adding a thread, so I am reverting it back |
30d is way too long |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
||
|algo = old( |
|algo = old() |
||
|archive = Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
Revision as of 11:45, 1 January 2013
|
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Changes to the Arbitration Committee
Changes to the Audit Subcommittee (AUSC)
- Announcement
- Yay! More work. MBisanz talk 00:46, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Minor request, can I have Checkuser back and be re-subscribed to the AUSC mailing list? It's the same info as my membership on func-en and oversight-l. Thanks. MBisanz talk 04:16, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ooops. I've filed the paperwork on meta for you: [1] Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you! MBisanz talk 05:42, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ooops. I've filed the paperwork on meta for you: [1] Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)