User talk:AlexR: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
revert - corrupt and lying admins I don't want to see here, either |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::Given that this has been going on for a while and spreads two articles, my patience is quite tried by now. -- [[User:AlexR|AlexR]] 19:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC) |
::Given that this has been going on for a while and spreads two articles, my patience is quite tried by now. -- [[User:AlexR|AlexR]] 19:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
==Blanking pages== |
|||
Please do not blank pages, or you will be blocked. I'm actually in two minds as to whether or not I should block you anyway, as it is clearly vandalism, but as you appeared to have stopped for the moment, I have decided not to. If someone inserts obscenities or pornographic images into the mediation page, feel free to remove such posts. However, if an established contributor adds content that you simply isagree with, I'm afraid you have to leave it there. The mediator may choose, if appropriate, to remove it. What you did today was definitely vandalism. [[User:Musical Linguist|AnnH]] [[User talk:Musical Linguist|<b><font size="3">♫</font></b>]] 10:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:19, 6 June 2006
Moved lots of stuff to archive:
- 23.Oct.2004: /Archive 10 2004 (In fact, this time I moved everything ;-)
- 28.May.2006: /Archive 05 2006 (Almost everything up to this date)
Amelia Peabody
Hey, thanks for working on the series! (I'm the one who created the succession box.) When you stub tag one of the Peabody books, would you please use {{mystery-novel-stub}}? Saves sorting later on...thanks again, and have fun. Cheers, ♥ Her Pegship♥ 16:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Please be civil
Please read WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. Calling other editors "stooges", as well as the overall tone of this edit, violate these policies. Thanks. --Allen 14:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'm here with the same general advice. We really encourage people to comment solely on edits, rather than making comments about an editor, especially in edit summaries. I don't object at all to your edit, but keep an eye on the tone. Jkelly 16:51, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Given that this has been going on for a while and spreads two articles, my patience is quite tried by now. -- AlexR 19:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)