User talk:DoRD: Difference between revisions

Welcome to my talk page. Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page. Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end. Please indent your posts with ":" if replying to an existing topic (or "::" if replying to a reply). I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to Watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply. ⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Regarding this SPI and CU[1], will the named account be blocked any time soon? According to the notes at the SPI the named account (User:Arfwedson) is a confirmed sock but remains unblocked. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 06:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A clerk or patrolling admin will be around eventually to take action on the account. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 10:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for letting me know. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 15:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A little group, likely on the same IP, if you're still around:

• User:MikelDimond
• User:Annabel4791
• User:DalePabstllt
• User:FelicaGZVN ‎

INeverCry 02:02, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• User:MagdaleCordero is another. INeverCry 02:08, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 03:13, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for keeping up with the sockpuppets editing NYIT. However, each day new socks are being created to make disruptive edits. Can the NYIT page be semi-protected to prevent new users from editing the page for the time being? MlaneNYIT (talk) 20:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please disregard request as page is now semi-protected. MlaneNYIT (talk) 03:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Sadly, it does appear to be necessary. Cheers ​—DoRD (talk)​ 03:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help out on this SPI case? It's a really big mess, and it's giving me a headache just trying to sort it out. Thanks. LightandDark2000 (talk) 09:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@LightandDark2000: As noted above, I am traveling at the moment, and do not have the necessary tools for an involved investigation such as this. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 02:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Okay. Well, hopefully we'll have this all sorted out before the sockmaster can cause any further damage. LightandDark2000 (talk) 04:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, DoRD. Not to crowd you or anything, but did you get a chance to take a look at this mess? Bishonen | talk 20:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Email sent. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 02:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will sue you.